Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

NVDD vs NVDL: which held to its multiple?

Over three months against its own daily promise, NVDD finished 1.8 points over and NVDL 2.9 points short.

Direxion Daily NVDA Bear 1X ETF and GraniteShares 2x Long NVDA Daily ETF, side by side, leveraged ETFs on ETFIQ.

−8.0%NVDD returned, 3 months
+6.2%NVDL returned, 3 months
−1.5 ptsNVDD from its stated multiple
−6.8 ptsNVDL from its stated multiple

ETFIQ Decay Resistance Score: NVDD scores higher

Did it keep up with its own daily multiple, compounded day by day?

NVDD 59.1NVDL 40.30.4, the lowest in this set99.6, the highest

A percentile among the 121 inverse ETFs over three months. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All leveraged ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed

NVDD1.5 pts short of its label · 3 months to Sep 11, 2026
NVDA +6.5% ×1 implies−6.5%NVDD returned−8.0%NVDA +6.5% ×1 implies−6.5%NVDD returned−8.0%
NVDL6.8 pts short of its label · 3 months to Sep 11, 2026
NVDA +6.5% ×2 implies+13.0%NVDL returned+6.2%NVDA +6.5% ×2 implies+13.0%NVDL returned+6.2%

Performance, window by window

NVDD and NVDL over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnMultiple would giveDifference
NVDDNVDLNVDDNVDLNVDDNVDL
1 month+1.7%−7.1%+2.5%−5.0%−0.8 pts−2.2 pts
3 months−8.0%+6.2%−6.5%+13.0%−1.5 pts−6.8 pts
6 months−21.0%+29.0%−21.4%+42.8%+0.4 pts−13.7 pts
1 year−24.0%+18.8%−23.5%+47.0%−0.5 pts−28.2 pts
3 yearsnot published+656.7%not publishednot meaningfulnot publishednot meaningful
Since launch−86.3%+2489.0%not meaningfulnot meaningfulnot meaningfulnot meaningful
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
NVDD and NVDL on the same fields, as of Sep 11, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
NVDD
Direxion Daily NVDA Bear 1X ETF
Aims to return 1 times the opposite of the daily move of NVIDIA (NVDA)
NVDL
GraniteShares 2x Long NVDA Daily ETF
Aims to return twice the daily move of NVIDIA (NVDA)
IssuerDirexionGraniteShares
Sets out to return-1x+2x
OnNVDANVDA
Segmentcompanycompany
Fund returned, 3 months−8.0%+6.2%
Underlying returned, 3 months+6.5%+6.5%
What the stated multiple implies, 3 months−6.5%+13.0%
Difference from stated, 3 months−1.5 pts−6.8 pts
Fund returned, 1 year or since launch−24.0%+18.8%
Difference from stated, over that window−0.5 pts−28.2 pts
Underlying volatility40%40%
Difference over the days both have tradedno shared window−2.2 pts
Expense rationot published1.05%
LaunchedSep 13, 2023Dec 13, 2022

NVDD in plain words

Three months to Sep 11, 2026: NVDD returned −8.0% where its own daily promise gave −9.8%, 1.8 points over. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and −1 times NVDA's 6.5% implies −6.5%, which makes NVDD look 1.5 points short. 3.3 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any −1 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. NVDD aims to return -1 times NVDA's move each day, then resets. Over one day it does that. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not -1 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more. NVDA moved at 40% annualized over that window. That is what decides how far the two figures separate: the same fund on a calm underlying and a violent one is a different product.

NVDL in plain words

Three months to Sep 11, 2026: NVDL returned +6.2% where its own daily promise gave +9.1%, 2.9 points short. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and +2 times NVDA's 6.5% implies +13.0%, which makes NVDL look 6.8 points short. 3.9 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any +2 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. NVDL aims to return +2 times NVDA's move each day, then resets. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not +2 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more.

Questions people ask

Which came closer to its stated multiple, NVDD or NVDL?
Over the window to Sep 11, 2026, NVDD finished 1.5 points from what its multiple implies and NVDL finished 6.8 points from its own, so NVDD came closer. Neither figure predicts the next window: it depends on how much the underlying moves about.
Are NVDD and NVDL levered on the same thing?
Yes. Both are levered on NVIDIA, NVDD at -1 times and NVDL at +2 times the daily move.
Which one decays faster, NVDD or NVDL?
Decay follows how much the underlying moves about. Over this window NVDD’s moved at 40% annualized and NVDL’s at 40%, so NVDD has the rougher ride and, at the same multiple, loses more to compounding.
Can I hold NVDD or NVDL for a year?
Both reset every day, so the multiple in the name applies to a single day and the daily results compound. Over a year the total is not the multiple times the year’s move, and in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less. ETFIQ makes no recommendation either way.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

NVDD against NVDL, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 11, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, NVDD against NVDL, data as of Sep 11, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/leverage/NVDD-NVDL Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources