Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

MSTP vs MSTX: which held to its multiple?

Over the days both have traded, MSTP finished 5.3 points from its stated multiple and MSTX 5.2.

GraniteShares 2x Long MSTR Daily ETF and Defiance Daily Target 2X Long MSTR ETF, side by side, leveraged ETFs on ETFIQ.

−11.2%MSTP returned, 3 months
−13.4%MSTX returned, 3 months
−22.5 ptsMSTP from its stated multiple
−24.7 ptsMSTX from its stated multiple

ETFIQ Decay Resistance Score: MSTP scores higher

Did it keep up with its own daily multiple, compounded day by day?

MSTP 17.5MSTX 5.50.1, the lowest in this set99.9, the highest

A percentile among the 391 leveraged ETFs, long, over three months. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All leveraged ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed

MSTP22.5 pts short of its label · 3 months to Sep 11, 2026
MSTR +5.7% ×2 implies+11.3%MSTP returned−11.2%MSTR +5.7% ×2 implies+11.3%MSTP returned−11.2%
MSTX24.7 pts short of its label · 3 months to Sep 11, 2026
MSTR +5.7% ×2 implies+11.3%MSTX returned−13.4%MSTR +5.7% ×2 implies+11.3%MSTX returned−13.4%

Performance, window by window

MSTP and MSTX over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnMultiple would giveDifference
MSTPMSTXMSTPMSTXMSTPMSTX
1 month+70.9%+71.1%+76.2%+76.2%−5.3 pts−5.2 pts
3 months−11.2%−13.4%+11.3%+11.3%−22.5 pts−24.7 pts
6 months−41.7%−44.4%−12.5%−12.5%−29.3 pts−31.9 pts
1 year−93.0%−93.8%−119.7%−119.7%+26.7 pts+25.8 pts
Since launch−95.7%−90.3%−133.0%−1.5%+37.4 pts−88.8 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
MSTP and MSTX on the same fields, as of Sep 11, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
MSTP
GraniteShares 2x Long MSTR Daily ETF
Aims to return twice the daily move of Strategy (MSTR)
MSTX
Defiance Daily Target 2X Long MSTR ETF
Aims to return twice the daily move of Strategy (MSTR)
IssuerGraniteSharesDefiance
Sets out to return+2x+2x
OnMSTRMSTR
Segmentcompanycompany
Fund returned, 3 months−11.2%−13.4%
Underlying returned, 3 months+5.7%+5.7%
What the stated multiple implies, 3 months+11.3%+11.3%
Difference from stated, 3 months−22.5 pts−24.7 pts
Fund returned, 1 year or since launch−93.0%−93.8%
Difference from stated, over that window+26.7 pts+25.8 pts
Underlying volatility88%88%
Difference over the days both have traded−5.3 pts−5.2 pts
Expense ratio1.50%1.31%
LaunchedJun 10, 2025Aug 15, 2024

MSTP in plain words

Three months to Sep 11, 2026: MSTP returned −11.2% where its own daily promise gave −6.6%, 4.6 points short. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and +2 times MSTR's 5.7% implies +11.3%, which makes MSTP look 22.5 points short. 17.9 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any +2 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. MSTP aims to return +2 times MSTR's move each day, then resets. Over one day it does that. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not +2 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more. MSTR moved at 88% annualized over that window. That is what decides how far the two figures separate: the same fund on a calm underlying and a violent one is a different product.

MSTX in plain words

Three months to Sep 11, 2026: MSTX returned −13.4% where its own daily promise gave −6.6%, 6.8 points short. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and +2 times MSTR's 5.7% implies +11.3%, which makes MSTX look 24.7 points short. MSTX aims to return +2 times MSTR's move each day, then resets.

Questions people ask

Which came closer to its stated multiple, MSTP or MSTX?
Over the window to Sep 11, 2026, MSTP finished 22.5 points from what its multiple implies and MSTX finished 24.7 points from its own, so MSTP came closer. Neither figure predicts the next window: it depends on how much the underlying moves about.
Are MSTP and MSTX levered on the same thing?
Yes. Both are levered on Strategy, MSTP at +2 times and MSTX at +2 times the daily move.
Which one decays faster, MSTP or MSTX?
Decay follows how much the underlying moves about. Over this window MSTP’s moved at 88% annualized and MSTX’s at 88%, so MSTP has the rougher ride and, at the same multiple, loses more to compounding.
Can I hold MSTP or MSTX for a year?
Both reset every day, so the multiple in the name applies to a single day and the daily results compound. Over a year the total is not the multiple times the year’s move, and in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less. ETFIQ makes no recommendation either way.
Which is cheaper, MSTP or MSTX?
MSTP charges 1.50% a year and MSTX charges 1.31%, so MSTX is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

MSTP against MSTX, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 11, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, MSTP against MSTX, data as of Sep 11, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/leverage/MSTP-MSTX Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources