Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

MSFD vs MSFU: which held to its multiple?

Over three months against its own daily promise, MSFD finished 1.0 points over and MSFU 3.7 points short.

Direxion Daily MSFT Bear 1X ETF and Direxion Daily MSFT Bull 2X ETF, side by side, leveraged ETFs on ETFIQ.

−23.9%MSFD returned, 3 months
+51.4%MSFU returned, 3 months
+3.2 ptsMSFD from its stated multiple
−2.8 ptsMSFU from its stated multiple

ETFIQ Decay Resistance Score: MSFD scores higher

Did it keep up with its own daily multiple, compounded day by day?

MSFD 28.9MSFU 24.60.4, the lowest in this set99.6, the highest

A percentile among the 121 inverse ETFs over three months. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All leveraged ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed

MSFD3.2 pts over its label · 3 months to Sep 11, 2026
MSFT +27.1% ×1 implies−27.1%MSFD returned−23.9%MSFT +27.1% ×1 implies−27.1%MSFD returned−23.9%
MSFU2.8 pts short of its label · 3 months to Sep 11, 2026
MSFT +27.1% ×2 implies+54.2%MSFU returned+51.4%MSFT +27.1% ×2 implies+54.2%MSFU returned+51.4%

Performance, window by window

MSFD and MSFU over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnMultiple would giveDifference
MSFDMSFUMSFDMSFUMSFDMSFU
1 month−0.8%+0.5%−0.8%+1.7%0.0 pts−1.2 pts
3 months−23.9%+51.4%−27.1%+54.2%+3.2 pts−2.8 pts
6 months−23.9%+41.5%−25.8%+51.6%+1.9 pts−10.1 pts
1 year−4.3%−18.6%+0.3%−0.5%−4.5 pts−18.0 pts
3 years−34.6%+29.4%−52.9%+105.8%+18.2 pts−76.3 pts
Since launch−51.2%+73.7%−98.4%+196.9%+47.2 pts−123.2 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
MSFD and MSFU on the same fields, as of Sep 11, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
MSFD
Direxion Daily MSFT Bear 1X ETF
Aims to return 1 times the opposite of the daily move of Microsoft (MSFT)
MSFU
Direxion Daily MSFT Bull 2X ETF
Aims to return twice the daily move of Microsoft (MSFT)
IssuerDirexionDirexion
Sets out to return-1x+2x
OnMSFTMSFT
Segmentcompanycompany
Fund returned, 3 months−23.9%+51.4%
Underlying returned, 3 months+27.1%+27.1%
What the stated multiple implies, 3 months−27.1%+54.2%
Difference from stated, 3 months+3.2 pts−2.8 pts
Fund returned, 1 year or since launch−4.3%−18.6%
Difference from stated, over that window−4.5 pts−18.0 pts
Underlying volatility43%43%
Difference over the days both have tradedno shared window−1.2 pts
Expense rationot published0.98%
LaunchedSep 7, 2022Sep 7, 2022

MSFD in plain words

Three months to Sep 11, 2026: MSFD returned −23.9% where its own daily promise gave −24.9%, 1.0 points over. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and −1 times MSFT's 27.1% implies −27.1%, which makes MSFD look 3.2 points over. 2.2 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any −1 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. MSFD aims to return -1 times MSFT's move each day, then resets. Over one day it does that. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not -1 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more. MSFT moved at 43% annualized over that window. That is what decides how far the two figures separate: the same fund on a calm underlying and a violent one is a different product.

MSFU in plain words

Three months to Sep 11, 2026: MSFU returned +51.4% where its own daily promise gave +55.1%, 3.7 points short. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and +2 times MSFT's 27.1% implies +54.2%, which makes MSFU look 2.8 points short. 1.0 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any +2 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. MSFU aims to return +2 times MSFT's move each day, then resets. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not +2 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more.

Questions people ask

Which came closer to its stated multiple, MSFD or MSFU?
Over the window to Sep 11, 2026, MSFD finished 3.2 points from what its multiple implies and MSFU finished 2.8 points from its own, so MSFU came closer. Neither figure predicts the next window: it depends on how much the underlying moves about.
Are MSFD and MSFU levered on the same thing?
Yes. Both are levered on Microsoft, MSFD at -1 times and MSFU at +2 times the daily move.
Which one decays faster, MSFD or MSFU?
Decay follows how much the underlying moves about. Over this window MSFD’s moved at 43% annualized and MSFU’s at 43%, so MSFD has the rougher ride and, at the same multiple, loses more to compounding.
Can I hold MSFD or MSFU for a year?
Both reset every day, so the multiple in the name applies to a single day and the daily results compound. Over a year the total is not the multiple times the year’s move, and in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less. ETFIQ makes no recommendation either way.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

MSFD against MSFU, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 11, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, MSFD against MSFU, data as of Sep 11, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/leverage/MSFD-MSFU Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources