Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

MRVX vs MVLL: which held to its multiple?

Over the days both have traded, MRVX finished 6.9 points from its stated multiple and MVLL 7.0.

Corgi MRVL 2x Daily ETF and GraniteShares 2x Long MRVL Daily ETF, side by side, leveraged ETFs on ETFIQ.

−3.9%MRVX returned, 3 months
−45.4%MVLL returned, 3 months
−16.2 ptsMRVX from its stated multiple
−14.2 ptsMVLL from its stated multiple
MRVX6.9 pts short of its label · 1 month to Sep 11, 2026
MRVL +8.8% ×2 implies+17.5%MRVX returned+10.6%MRVL +8.8% ×2 implies+17.5%MRVX returned+10.6%
MVLL14.2 pts short of its label · 3 months to Sep 11, 2026
MRVL −15.6% ×2 implies−31.1%MVLL returned−45.4%MRVL −15.6% ×2 implies−31.1%MVLL returned−45.4%

Performance, window by window

MRVX and MVLL over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnMultiple would giveDifference
MRVXMVLLMRVXMVLLMRVXMVLL
1 month+10.6%+10.5%+17.5%+17.5%−6.9 pts−7.0 pts
3 monthsnot published−45.4%not published−31.1%not published−14.2 pts
6 monthsnot published+317.5%not publishednot meaningfulnot publishednot meaningful
1 yearnot published+482.1%not publishednot meaningfulnot publishednot meaningful
Since launch−3.9%+267.0%+12.3%not meaningful−16.2 ptsnot meaningful
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
MRVX and MVLL on the same fields, as of Sep 11, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
MRVX
Corgi MRVL 2x Daily ETF
Aims to return twice the daily move of MRVL
MVLL
GraniteShares 2x Long MRVL Daily ETF
Aims to return twice the daily move of MRVL
Issuernot establishedGraniteShares
Sets out to return+2x+2x
OnMRVLMRVL
Segmentcompanycompany
Fund returned, 3 months+10.6%−45.4%
Underlying returned, 3 months+8.8%−15.6%
What the stated multiple implies, 3 months+17.5%−31.1%
Difference from stated, 3 months−6.9 pts−14.2 pts
Fund returned, 1 year or since launch−3.9%+482.1%
Difference from stated, over that window−16.2 ptsnot available
Underlying volatility78%91%
Difference over the days both have traded−6.9 pts−7.0 pts
Expense ratio1.29%1.50%
LaunchedJul 14, 2026Mar 7, 2025

MRVX in plain words

One month to Sep 11, 2026: MRVX returned +10.6% where its own daily promise gave +12.3%, 1.7 points short. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and +2 times MRVL's 8.8% implies +17.5%, which makes MRVX look 6.9 points short. 5.2 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any +2 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. MRVX aims to return +2 times MRVL's move each day, then resets. Over one day it does that. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not +2 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more. MRVL moved at 78% annualized over that window. That is what decides how far the two figures separate: the same fund on a calm underlying and a violent one is a different product.

MVLL in plain words

Three months to Sep 11, 2026: MVLL returned −45.4% where its own daily promise gave −42.2%, 3.2 points short. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and +2 times MRVL's −15.6% implies −31.1%, which makes MVLL look 14.2 points short. 11.0 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any +2 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. MVLL aims to return +2 times MRVL's move each day, then resets. MRVL moved at 91% annualized over that window.

Questions people ask

Which came closer to its stated multiple, MRVX or MVLL?
Over the window to Sep 11, 2026, MRVX finished 6.9 points from what its multiple implies and MVLL finished 14.2 points from its own, so MRVX came closer. Neither figure predicts the next window: it depends on how much the underlying moves about.
Are MRVX and MVLL levered on the same thing?
Yes. Both are levered on MRVL, MRVX at +2 times and MVLL at +2 times the daily move.
Which one decays faster, MRVX or MVLL?
Decay follows how much the underlying moves about. Over this window MRVX’s moved at 78% annualized and MVLL’s at 91%, so MVLL has the rougher ride and, at the same multiple, loses more to compounding.
Can I hold MRVX or MVLL for a year?
Both reset every day, so the multiple in the name applies to a single day and the daily results compound. Over a year the total is not the multiple times the year’s move, and in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less. ETFIQ makes no recommendation either way.
Which is cheaper, MRVX or MVLL?
MRVX charges 1.29% a year and MVLL charges 1.50%, so MRVX is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

MRVX against MVLL, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 11, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, MRVX against MVLL, data as of Sep 11, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/leverage/MRVX-MVLL Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources