Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

MRVU vs MRVX: which held to its multiple?

Over the days both have traded, MRVU finished 6.6 points from its stated multiple and MRVX 6.9.

Direxion Daily MRVL Bull 2X ETF and Corgi MRVL 2x Daily ETF, side by side, leveraged ETFs on ETFIQ.

−43.9%MRVU returned, 3 months
−3.9%MRVX returned, 3 months
−12.8 ptsMRVU from its stated multiple
−16.2 ptsMRVX from its stated multiple
MRVU12.8 pts short of its label · 3 months to Sep 11, 2026
MRVL −15.6% ×2 implies−31.1%MRVU returned−43.9%MRVL −15.6% ×2 implies−31.1%MRVU returned−43.9%
MRVX6.9 pts short of its label · 1 month to Sep 11, 2026
MRVL +8.8% ×2 implies+17.5%MRVX returned+10.6%MRVL +8.8% ×2 implies+17.5%MRVX returned+10.6%

Performance, window by window

MRVU and MRVX over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnMultiple would giveDifference
MRVUMRVXMRVUMRVXMRVUMRVX
1 month+10.9%+10.6%+17.5%+17.5%−6.6 pts−6.9 pts
3 months−43.9%not published−31.1%not published−12.8 ptsnot published
6 months+339.9%not publishednot meaningfulnot publishednot meaningfulnot published
Since launch+389.1%−3.9%not meaningful+12.3%not meaningful−16.2 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
MRVU and MRVX on the same fields, as of Sep 11, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
MRVU
Direxion Daily MRVL Bull 2X ETF
Aims to return twice the daily move of MRVL
MRVX
Corgi MRVL 2x Daily ETF
Aims to return twice the daily move of MRVL
IssuerDirexionnot established
Sets out to return+2x+2x
OnMRVLMRVL
Segmentcompanycompany
Fund returned, 3 months−43.9%+10.6%
Underlying returned, 3 months−15.6%+8.8%
What the stated multiple implies, 3 months−31.1%+17.5%
Difference from stated, 3 months−12.8 pts−6.9 pts
Fund returned, 1 year or since launch+389.1%−3.9%
Difference from stated, over that windownot available−16.2 pts
Underlying volatility91%78%
Difference over the days both have traded−6.6 pts−6.9 pts
Expense ratio0.97%1.29%
LaunchedFeb 11, 2026Jul 14, 2026

MRVU in plain words

Three months to Sep 11, 2026: MRVU returned −43.9% where its own daily promise gave −42.2%, 1.8 points short. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and +2 times MRVL's −15.6% implies −31.1%, which makes MRVU look 12.8 points short. 11.0 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any +2 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. MRVU aims to return +2 times MRVL's move each day, then resets. Over one day it does that. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not +2 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more. MRVL moved at 91% annualized over that window. That is what decides how far the two figures separate: the same fund on a calm underlying and a violent one is a different product.

MRVX in plain words

One month to Sep 11, 2026: MRVX returned +10.6% where its own daily promise gave +12.3%, 1.7 points short. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and +2 times MRVL's 8.8% implies +17.5%, which makes MRVX look 6.9 points short. 5.2 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any +2 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. MRVX aims to return +2 times MRVL's move each day, then resets. MRVL moved at 78% annualized over that window.

Questions people ask

Which came closer to its stated multiple, MRVU or MRVX?
Over the window to Sep 11, 2026, MRVU finished 12.8 points from what its multiple implies and MRVX finished 6.9 points from its own, so MRVX came closer. Neither figure predicts the next window: it depends on how much the underlying moves about.
Are MRVU and MRVX levered on the same thing?
Yes. Both are levered on MRVL, MRVU at +2 times and MRVX at +2 times the daily move.
Which one decays faster, MRVU or MRVX?
Decay follows how much the underlying moves about. Over this window MRVU’s moved at 91% annualized and MRVX’s at 78%, so MRVU has the rougher ride and, at the same multiple, loses more to compounding.
Can I hold MRVU or MRVX for a year?
Both reset every day, so the multiple in the name applies to a single day and the daily results compound. Over a year the total is not the multiple times the year’s move, and in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less. ETFIQ makes no recommendation either way.
Which is cheaper, MRVU or MRVX?
MRVU charges 0.97% a year and MRVX charges 1.29%, so MRVU is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

MRVU against MRVX, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 11, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, MRVU against MRVX, data as of Sep 11, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/leverage/MRVU-MRVX Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources