Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

GLX vs GLXU: which held to its multiple?

Over the days both have traded, GLX finished 6.7 points from its stated multiple and GLXU 6.7.

Corgi GLXY 2x Daily ETF and T-REX 2X LONG GLXY DAILY TARGET ETF, side by side, leveraged ETFs on ETFIQ.

−35.3%GLX returned, 3 months
−58.3%GLXU returned, 3 months
−13.8 ptsGLX from its stated multiple
−4.6 ptsGLXU from its stated multiple
GLX6.7 pts short of its label · 1 month to Sep 11, 2026
GLXY +15.8% ×2 implies+31.5%GLX returned+24.8%GLXY +15.8% ×2 implies+31.5%GLX returned+24.8%
GLXU4.6 pts short of its label · 3 months to Sep 11, 2026
GLXY −26.9% ×2 implies−53.7%GLXU returned−58.3%GLXY −26.9% ×2 implies−53.7%GLXU returned−58.3%

Performance, window by window

GLX and GLXU over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnMultiple would giveDifference
GLXGLXUGLXGLXUGLXGLXU
1 month+24.8%+24.8%+31.5%+31.5%−6.7 pts−6.7 pts
3 monthsnot published−58.3%not published−53.7%not published−4.6 pts
6 monthsnot published−26.3%not published+18.3%not published−44.6 pts
1 yearnot published−75.2%not published−31.0%not published−44.3 pts
Since launch−35.3%−75.2%−21.5%−24.3%−13.8 pts−50.9 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
GLX and GLXU on the same fields, as of Sep 11, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
GLX
Corgi GLXY 2x Daily ETF
Aims to return twice the daily move of GLXY
GLXU
T-REX 2X LONG GLXY DAILY TARGET ETF
Aims to return twice the daily move of GLXY
IssuerCorgiT-REX
Sets out to return+2x+2x
OnGLXYGLXY
Segmentcompanycompany
Fund returned, 3 months+24.8%−58.3%
Underlying returned, 3 months+15.8%−26.9%
What the stated multiple implies, 3 months+31.5%−53.7%
Difference from stated, 3 months−6.7 pts−4.6 pts
Fund returned, 1 year or since launch−35.3%−75.2%
Difference from stated, over that window−13.8 pts−44.3 pts
Underlying volatility81%89%
Difference over the days both have traded−6.7 pts−6.7 pts
Expense rationot published1.50%
LaunchedJun 30, 2026Aug 8, 2025

GLX in plain words

One month to Sep 11, 2026: GLX returned +24.8% where its own daily promise gave +26.9%, 2.0 points short. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and +2 times GLXY's 15.8% implies +31.5%, which makes GLX look 6.7 points short. 4.6 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any +2 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. GLX aims to return +2 times GLXY's move each day, then resets. Over one day it does that. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not +2 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more. GLXY moved at 81% annualized over that window. That is what decides how far the two figures separate: the same fund on a calm underlying and a violent one is a different product.

GLXU in plain words

Three months to Sep 11, 2026: GLXU returned −58.3% where its own daily promise gave −56.4%, 1.9 points short. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and +2 times GLXY's −26.9% implies −53.7%, which makes GLXU look 4.6 points short. 2.6 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any +2 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. GLXU aims to return +2 times GLXY's move each day, then resets. GLXY moved at 89% annualized over that window.

Questions people ask

Which came closer to its stated multiple, GLX or GLXU?
Over the window to Sep 11, 2026, GLX finished 6.7 points from what its multiple implies and GLXU finished 4.6 points from its own, so GLXU came closer. Neither figure predicts the next window: it depends on how much the underlying moves about.
Are GLX and GLXU levered on the same thing?
Yes. Both are levered on GLXY, GLX at +2 times and GLXU at +2 times the daily move.
Which one decays faster, GLX or GLXU?
Decay follows how much the underlying moves about. Over this window GLX’s moved at 81% annualized and GLXU’s at 89%, so GLXU has the rougher ride and, at the same multiple, loses more to compounding.
Can I hold GLX or GLXU for a year?
Both reset every day, so the multiple in the name applies to a single day and the daily results compound. Over a year the total is not the multiple times the year’s move, and in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less. ETFIQ makes no recommendation either way.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

GLX against GLXU, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 11, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, GLX against GLXU, data as of Sep 11, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/leverage/GLX-GLXU Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources