Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

GLGG vs GLX: which held to its multiple?

Over the days both have traded, GLGG finished 6.6 points from its stated multiple and GLX 6.7.

Leverage Shares 2X Long GLXY Daily ETF and Corgi GLXY 2x Daily ETF, side by side, leveraged ETFs on ETFIQ.

−58.4%GLGG returned, 3 months
−35.3%GLX returned, 3 months
−4.7 ptsGLGG from its stated multiple
−13.8 ptsGLX from its stated multiple
GLGG4.7 pts short of its label · 3 months to Sep 11, 2026
GLXY −26.9% ×2 implies−53.7%GLGG returned−58.4%GLXY −26.9% ×2 implies−53.7%GLGG returned−58.4%
GLX6.7 pts short of its label · 1 month to Sep 11, 2026
GLXY +15.8% ×2 implies+31.5%GLX returned+24.8%GLXY +15.8% ×2 implies+31.5%GLX returned+24.8%

Performance, window by window

GLGG and GLX over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnMultiple would giveDifference
GLGGGLXGLGGGLXGLGGGLX
1 month+24.9%+24.8%+31.5%+31.5%−6.6 pts−6.7 pts
3 months−58.4%not published−53.7%not published−4.7 ptsnot published
6 months−26.9%not published+18.3%not published−45.3 ptsnot published
1 year−75.5%not published−31.0%not published−44.5 ptsnot published
Since launch−65.6%−35.3%+4.3%−21.5%−69.9 pts−13.8 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
GLGG and GLX on the same fields, as of Sep 11, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
GLGG
Leverage Shares 2X Long GLXY Daily ETF
Aims to return twice the daily move of GLXY
GLX
Corgi GLXY 2x Daily ETF
Aims to return twice the daily move of GLXY
IssuerLeverage SharesCorgi
Sets out to return+2x+2x
OnGLXYGLXY
Segmentcompanycompany
Fund returned, 3 months−58.4%+24.8%
Underlying returned, 3 months−26.9%+15.8%
What the stated multiple implies, 3 months−53.7%+31.5%
Difference from stated, 3 months−4.7 pts−6.7 pts
Fund returned, 1 year or since launch−75.5%−35.3%
Difference from stated, over that window−44.5 pts−13.8 pts
Underlying volatility89%81%
Difference over the days both have traded−6.6 pts−6.7 pts
Expense ratio0.76%not published
LaunchedAug 21, 2025Jun 30, 2026

GLGG in plain words

Three months to Sep 11, 2026: GLGG returned −58.4% where its own daily promise gave −56.4%, 2.0 points short. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and +2 times GLXY's −26.9% implies −53.7%, which makes GLGG look 4.7 points short. 2.6 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any +2 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. GLGG aims to return +2 times GLXY's move each day, then resets. Over one day it does that. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not +2 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more. GLXY moved at 89% annualized over that window. That is what decides how far the two figures separate: the same fund on a calm underlying and a violent one is a different product.

GLX in plain words

One month to Sep 11, 2026: GLX returned +24.8% where its own daily promise gave +26.9%, 2.0 points short. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and +2 times GLXY's 15.8% implies +31.5%, which makes GLX look 6.7 points short. 4.6 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any +2 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. GLX aims to return +2 times GLXY's move each day, then resets. GLXY moved at 81% annualized over that window.

Questions people ask

Which came closer to its stated multiple, GLGG or GLX?
Over the window to Sep 11, 2026, GLGG finished 4.7 points from what its multiple implies and GLX finished 6.7 points from its own, so GLGG came closer. Neither figure predicts the next window: it depends on how much the underlying moves about.
Are GLGG and GLX levered on the same thing?
Yes. Both are levered on GLXY, GLGG at +2 times and GLX at +2 times the daily move.
Which one decays faster, GLGG or GLX?
Decay follows how much the underlying moves about. Over this window GLGG’s moved at 89% annualized and GLX’s at 81%, so GLGG has the rougher ride and, at the same multiple, loses more to compounding.
Can I hold GLGG or GLX for a year?
Both reset every day, so the multiple in the name applies to a single day and the daily results compound. Over a year the total is not the multiple times the year’s move, and in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less. ETFIQ makes no recommendation either way.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

GLGG against GLX, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 11, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, GLGG against GLX, data as of Sep 11, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/leverage/GLGG-GLX Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources