Data as of .
DULL vs UGLD: which held to its multiple?
Over three months against its own daily promise, DULL finished 1.2 points over and UGLD 2.4 points short.
ETFIQ Decay Resistance Score: UGLD scores higher
Did it keep up with its own daily multiple, compounded day by day?
A percentile among the 121 inverse ETFs over three months. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All leveraged ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Multiple would give | Difference | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DULL | UGLD | DULL | UGLD | DULL | UGLD | |
| 1 month | +1.3% | −4.3% | +4.6% | −3.0% | −3.2 pts | −1.2 pts |
| 3 months | −15.8% | +2.4% | −9.5% | +6.3% | −6.4 pts | −3.9 pts |
| 6 months | +28.4% | not published | +40.4% | not published | −12.0 pts | not published |
| 1 year | −62.2% | not published | −57.4% | not published | −4.8 pts | not published |
| 3 years | −94.9% | not published | not meaningful | not published | not meaningful | not published |
| Since launch | −95.5% | −11.3% | not meaningful | −6.8% | not meaningful | −4.5 pts |
| DULL MicroSectors Gold -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs due January 29, 2043 Aims to return three times the opposite of the daily move of gold (GLD) | UGLD Direxion Daily Gold Bull 2X ETF Aims to return twice the daily move of gold (GLD) | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | MicroSectors | Direxion |
| Sets out to return | -3x | +2x |
| On | GLD | GLD |
| Segment | index | metal |
| Fund returned, 3 months | −15.8% | +2.4% |
| Underlying returned, 3 months | +3.2% | +3.2% |
| What the stated multiple implies, 3 months | −9.5% | +6.3% |
| Difference from stated, 3 months | −6.4 pts | −3.9 pts |
| Fund returned, 1 year or since launch | −62.2% | −11.3% |
| Difference from stated, over that window | −4.8 pts | −4.5 pts |
| Underlying volatility | 25% | 25% |
| Difference over the days both have traded | no shared window | −3.9 pts |
| Expense ratio | not published | 1.07% |
| Launched | Feb 22, 2023 | May 28, 2026 |
DULL in plain words
Three months to Sep 11, 2026: DULL returned −15.8% where its own daily promise gave −17.0%, 1.2 points over. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and −3 times GLD's 3.2% implies −9.5%, which makes DULL look 6.4 points short. 7.5 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any −3 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. DULL aims to return -3 times GLD's move each day, then resets. Over one day it does that. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not -3 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more. GLD moved at 25% annualized over that window. That is what decides how far the two figures separate: the same fund on a calm underlying and a violent one is a different product.
UGLD in plain words
Three months to Sep 11, 2026: UGLD returned +2.4% where its own daily promise gave +4.8%, 2.4 points short. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and +2 times GLD's 3.2% implies +6.3%, which makes UGLD look 3.9 points short. 1.5 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any +2 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. UGLD aims to return +2 times GLD's move each day, then resets. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not +2 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more.
Questions people ask
- Which came closer to its stated multiple, DULL or UGLD?
- Over the window to Sep 11, 2026, DULL finished 6.4 points from what its multiple implies and UGLD finished 3.9 points from its own, so UGLD came closer. Neither figure predicts the next window: it depends on how much the underlying moves about.
- Are DULL and UGLD levered on the same thing?
- Yes. Both are levered on gold, DULL at -3 times and UGLD at +2 times the daily move.
- Which one decays faster, DULL or UGLD?
- Decay follows how much the underlying moves about. Over this window DULL’s moved at 25% annualized and UGLD’s at 25%, so DULL has the rougher ride and, at the same multiple, loses more to compounding.
- Can I hold DULL or UGLD for a year?
- Both reset every day, so the multiple in the name applies to a single day and the daily results compound. Over a year the total is not the multiple times the year’s move, and in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less. ETFIQ makes no recommendation either way.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, DULL against UGLD, data as of Sep 11, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/leverage/DULL-UGLD Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.