Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

DULL vs SHNY: which held to its multiple?

Over three months against its own daily promise, DULL finished 1.2 points over and SHNY 5.4 points short.

MicroSectors Gold -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs due January 29, 2043 and MicroSectors Gold 3X Leveraged ETNs due January 29, 2043, side by side, leveraged ETFs on ETFIQ.

−15.8%DULL returned, 3 months
−0.5%SHNY returned, 3 months
−6.4 ptsDULL from its stated multiple
−10.0 ptsSHNY from its stated multiple

ETFIQ Decay Resistance Score: DULL scores higher

Did it keep up with its own daily multiple, compounded day by day?

DULL 31SHNY 10.60.4, the lowest in this set99.6, the highest

A percentile among the 121 inverse ETFs over three months. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All leveraged ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed

DULL6.4 pts short of its label · 3 months to Sep 11, 2026
GLD +3.2% ×3 implies−9.5%DULL returned−15.8%GLD +3.2% ×3 implies−9.5%DULL returned−15.8%
SHNY10 pts short of its label · 3 months to Sep 11, 2026
GLD +3.2% ×3 implies+9.5%SHNY returned−0.5%GLD +3.2% ×3 implies+9.5%SHNY returned−0.5%

Performance, window by window

DULL and SHNY over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnMultiple would giveDifference
DULLSHNYDULLSHNYDULLSHNY
1 month+1.3%−7.8%+4.6%−4.6%−3.2 pts−3.3 pts
3 months−15.8%−0.5%−9.5%+9.5%−6.4 pts−10.0 pts
6 months+28.4%−47.5%+40.4%−40.4%−12.0 pts−7.1 pts
1 year−62.2%+5.4%−57.4%+57.4%−4.8 pts−52.0 pts
3 years−94.9%+286.1%not meaningfulnot meaningfulnot meaningfulnot meaningful
Since launch−95.5%+278.9%not meaningfulnot meaningfulnot meaningfulnot meaningful
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
DULL and SHNY on the same fields, as of Sep 11, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
DULL
MicroSectors Gold -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs due January 29, 2043
Aims to return three times the opposite of the daily move of gold (GLD)
SHNY
MicroSectors Gold 3X Leveraged ETNs due January 29, 2043
Aims to return three times the daily move of gold (GLD)
IssuerMicroSectorsMicroSectors
Sets out to return-3x+3x
OnGLDGLD
Segmentindexindex
Fund returned, 3 months−15.8%−0.5%
Underlying returned, 3 months+3.2%+3.2%
What the stated multiple implies, 3 months−9.5%+9.5%
Difference from stated, 3 months−6.4 pts−10.0 pts
Fund returned, 1 year or since launch−62.2%+5.4%
Difference from stated, over that window−4.8 pts−52.0 pts
Underlying volatility25%25%
Expense rationot publishednot published
LaunchedFeb 22, 2023Feb 22, 2023

DULL in plain words

Three months to Sep 11, 2026: DULL returned −15.8% where its own daily promise gave −17.0%, 1.2 points over. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and −3 times GLD's 3.2% implies −9.5%, which makes DULL look 6.4 points short. 7.5 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any −3 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. DULL aims to return -3 times GLD's move each day, then resets. Over one day it does that. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not -3 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more. GLD moved at 25% annualized over that window. That is what decides how far the two figures separate: the same fund on a calm underlying and a violent one is a different product.

SHNY in plain words

Three months to Sep 11, 2026: SHNY returned −0.5% where its own daily promise gave +4.8%, 5.4 points short. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and +3 times GLD's 3.2% implies +9.5%, which makes SHNY look 10.0 points short. 4.6 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any +3 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. SHNY aims to return +3 times GLD's move each day, then resets. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not +3 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more.

Questions people ask

Which came closer to its stated multiple, DULL or SHNY?
Over the window to Sep 11, 2026, DULL finished 6.4 points from what its multiple implies and SHNY finished 10.0 points from its own, so DULL came closer. Neither figure predicts the next window: it depends on how much the underlying moves about.
Are DULL and SHNY levered on the same thing?
Yes. Both are levered on gold, DULL at -3 times and SHNY at +3 times the daily move.
Which one decays faster, DULL or SHNY?
Decay follows how much the underlying moves about. Over this window DULL’s moved at 25% annualized and SHNY’s at 25%, so DULL has the rougher ride and, at the same multiple, loses more to compounding.
Can I hold DULL or SHNY for a year?
Both reset every day, so the multiple in the name applies to a single day and the daily results compound. Over a year the total is not the multiple times the year’s move, and in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less. ETFIQ makes no recommendation either way.

Other comparisons

DULL against SHNY, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 11, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, DULL against SHNY, data as of Sep 11, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/leverage/DULL-SHNY Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources