Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

DOG vs UDOW: which held to its multiple?

Over three months against its own daily promise, DOG finished 1.4 points over and UDOW 2.2 points short.

ProShares Short Dow30 and ProShares UltraPro Dow30, side by side, leveraged ETFs on ETFIQ.

−1.7%DOG returned, 3 months
+5.6%UDOW returned, 3 months
+1.1 ptsDOG from its stated multiple
−3.0 ptsUDOW from its stated multiple

ETFIQ Decay Resistance Score: UDOW scores higher

Did it keep up with its own daily multiple, compounded day by day?

DOG 38.8UDOW 63.80.4, the lowest in this set99.6, the highest

A percentile among the 121 inverse ETFs over three months. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All leveraged ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed

DOG1.1 pts over its label · 3 months to Sep 11, 2026
DIA +2.9% ×1 implies−2.9%DOG returned−1.7%DIA +2.9% ×1 implies−2.9%DOG returned−1.7%
UDOW3 pts short of its label · 3 months to Sep 11, 2026
DIA +2.9% ×3 implies+8.6%UDOW returned+5.6%DIA +2.9% ×3 implies+8.6%UDOW returned+5.6%

Performance, window by window

DOG and UDOW over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnMultiple would giveDifference
DOGUDOWDOGUDOWDOGUDOW
1 month+2.5%−7.0%+2.0%−6.1%+0.5 pts−0.9 pts
3 months−1.7%+5.6%−2.9%+8.6%+1.1 pts−3.0 pts
6 months−10.0%+36.0%−13.5%+40.6%+3.5 pts−4.5 pts
1 year−9.1%+33.4%−15.6%+46.7%+6.5 pts−13.4 pts
3 years−24.3%+141.0%−58.9%+176.8%+34.7 pts−35.8 pts
Since launch−87.5%+4555.1%not meaningfulnot meaningfulnot meaningfulnot meaningful
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
DOG and UDOW on the same fields, as of Sep 11, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
DOG
ProShares Short Dow30
Aims to return 1 times the opposite of the daily move of the Dow 30
UDOW
ProShares UltraPro Dow30
Aims to return three times the daily move of the Dow 30
IssuerProSharesProShares
Sets out to return-1x+3x
OnDIADIA
Segmentus large capus large cap
Fund returned, 3 months−1.7%+5.6%
Underlying returned, 3 months+2.9%+2.9%
What the stated multiple implies, 3 months−2.9%+8.6%
Difference from stated, 3 months+1.1 pts−3.0 pts
Fund returned, 1 year or since launch−9.1%+33.4%
Difference from stated, over that window+6.5 pts−13.4 pts
Underlying volatility11%11%
Expense rationot published0.95%
LaunchedJan 4, 2010Feb 11, 2010

DOG in plain words

Three months to Sep 11, 2026: DOG returned −1.7% where its own daily promise gave −3.1%, 1.4 points over. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and −1 times DIA's 2.9% implies −2.9%, which makes DOG look 1.1 points over. 0.2 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any −1 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. DOG aims to return -1 times DIA's move each day, then resets. Over one day it does that. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not -1 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more. DIA moved at 11% annualized over that window. That is what decides how far the two figures separate: the same fund on a calm underlying and a violent one is a different product.

UDOW in plain words

Three months to Sep 11, 2026: UDOW returned +5.6% where its own daily promise gave +7.8%, 2.2 points short. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and +3 times DIA's 2.9% implies +8.6%, which makes UDOW look 3.0 points short. 0.8 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any +3 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. UDOW aims to return +3 times DIA's move each day, then resets. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not +3 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more.

Questions people ask

Which came closer to its stated multiple, DOG or UDOW?
Over the window to Sep 11, 2026, DOG finished 1.1 points from what its multiple implies and UDOW finished 3.0 points from its own, so DOG came closer. Neither figure predicts the next window: it depends on how much the underlying moves about.
Are DOG and UDOW levered on the same thing?
Yes. Both are levered on the Dow 30, DOG at -1 times and UDOW at +3 times the daily move.
Which one decays faster, DOG or UDOW?
Decay follows how much the underlying moves about. Over this window DOG’s moved at 11% annualized and UDOW’s at 11%, so DOG has the rougher ride and, at the same multiple, loses more to compounding.
Can I hold DOG or UDOW for a year?
Both reset every day, so the multiple in the name applies to a single day and the daily results compound. Over a year the total is not the multiple times the year’s move, and in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less. ETFIQ makes no recommendation either way.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

DOG against UDOW, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 11, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, DOG against UDOW, data as of Sep 11, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/leverage/DOG-UDOW Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources