Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

DDM vs DOG: which held to its multiple?

Over three months against its own daily promise, DDM finished 1.1 points short and DOG 1.4 points over.

ProShares Ultra Dow30 and ProShares Short Dow30, side by side, leveraged ETFs on ETFIQ.

+4.4%DDM returned, 3 months
−1.7%DOG returned, 3 months
−1.4 ptsDDM from its stated multiple
+1.1 ptsDOG from its stated multiple

ETFIQ Decay Resistance Score: DDM scores higher

Did it keep up with its own daily multiple, compounded day by day?

DDM 95.4DOG 38.80.1, the lowest in this set99.9, the highest

A percentile among the 391 leveraged ETFs, long, over three months. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All leveraged ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed

DDM1.4 pts short of its label · 3 months to Sep 11, 2026
DIA +2.9% ×2 implies+5.7%DDM returned+4.4%DIA +2.9% ×2 implies+5.7%DDM returned+4.4%
DOG1.1 pts over its label · 3 months to Sep 11, 2026
DIA +2.9% ×1 implies−2.9%DOG returned−1.7%DIA +2.9% ×1 implies−2.9%DOG returned−1.7%

Performance, window by window

DDM and DOG over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnMultiple would giveDifference
DDMDOGDDMDOGDDMDOG
1 month−4.5%+2.5%−4.1%+2.0%−0.5 pts+0.5 pts
3 months+4.4%−1.7%+5.7%−2.9%−1.4 pts+1.1 pts
6 months+24.7%−10.0%+27.0%−13.5%−2.3 pts+3.5 pts
1 year+24.6%−9.1%+31.1%−15.6%−6.5 pts+6.5 pts
3 years+98.5%−24.3%+117.9%−58.9%−19.4 pts+34.7 pts
Since launch+1871.6%−87.5%not meaningfulnot meaningfulnot meaningfulnot meaningful
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
DDM and DOG on the same fields, as of Sep 11, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
DDM
ProShares Ultra Dow30
Aims to return twice the daily move of the Dow 30
DOG
ProShares Short Dow30
Aims to return 1 times the opposite of the daily move of the Dow 30
IssuerProSharesProShares
Sets out to return+2x-1x
OnDIADIA
Segmentus large capus large cap
Fund returned, 3 months+4.4%−1.7%
Underlying returned, 3 months+2.9%+2.9%
What the stated multiple implies, 3 months+5.7%−2.9%
Difference from stated, 3 months−1.4 pts+1.1 pts
Fund returned, 1 year or since launch+24.6%−9.1%
Difference from stated, over that window−6.5 pts+6.5 pts
Underlying volatility11%11%
Expense ratio0.95%not published
LaunchedJan 4, 2010Jan 4, 2010

DDM in plain words

Three months to Sep 11, 2026: DDM returned +4.4% where its own daily promise gave +5.5%, 1.1 points short. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and +2 times DIA's 2.9% implies +5.7%, which makes DDM look 1.4 points short. 0.2 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any +2 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. DDM aims to return +2 times DIA's move each day, then resets. Over one day it does that. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not +2 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more. DIA moved at 11% annualized over that window. That is what decides how far the two figures separate: the same fund on a calm underlying and a violent one is a different product.

DOG in plain words

Three months to Sep 11, 2026: DOG returned −1.7% where its own daily promise gave −3.1%, 1.4 points over. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and −1 times DIA's 2.9% implies −2.9%, which makes DOG look 1.1 points over. 0.2 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any −1 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. DOG aims to return -1 times DIA's move each day, then resets. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not -1 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more.

Questions people ask

Which came closer to its stated multiple, DDM or DOG?
Over the window to Sep 11, 2026, DDM finished 1.4 points from what its multiple implies and DOG finished 1.1 points from its own, so DOG came closer. Neither figure predicts the next window: it depends on how much the underlying moves about.
Are DDM and DOG levered on the same thing?
Yes. Both are levered on the Dow 30, DDM at +2 times and DOG at -1 times the daily move.
Which one decays faster, DDM or DOG?
Decay follows how much the underlying moves about. Over this window DDM’s moved at 11% annualized and DOG’s at 11%, so DDM has the rougher ride and, at the same multiple, loses more to compounding.
Can I hold DDM or DOG for a year?
Both reset every day, so the multiple in the name applies to a single day and the daily results compound. Over a year the total is not the multiple times the year’s move, and in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less. ETFIQ makes no recommendation either way.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

DDM against DOG, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 11, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, DDM against DOG, data as of Sep 11, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/leverage/DDM-DOG Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources