Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

CRCD vs CRCG: which held to its multiple?

Over three months against its own daily promise, CRCD finished 0.5 points short and CRCG 5.0 points short.

T-REX 2X INVERSE CRCL DAILY TARGET ETF and Leverage Shares 2X Long CRCL Daily ETF, side by side, leveraged ETFs on ETFIQ.

−60.0%CRCD returned, 3 months
+5.8%CRCG returned, 3 months
−27.2 ptsCRCD from its stated multiple
−27.0 ptsCRCG from its stated multiple

ETFIQ Decay Resistance Score: CRCG scores higher

Did it keep up with its own daily multiple, compounded day by day?

CRCD 11.2CRCG 14.70.4, the lowest in this set99.6, the highest

A percentile among the 121 inverse ETFs over three months. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All leveraged ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed

CRCD27.2 pts short of its label · 3 months to Sep 11, 2026
CRCL +16.4% ×2 implies−32.8%CRCD returned−60.0%CRCL +16.4% ×2 implies−32.8%CRCD returned−60.0%
CRCG27 pts short of its label · 3 months to Sep 11, 2026
CRCL +16.4% ×2 implies+32.8%CRCG returned+5.8%CRCL +16.4% ×2 implies+32.8%CRCG returned+5.8%

Performance, window by window

CRCD and CRCG over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnMultiple would giveDifference
CRCDCRCGCRCDCRCGCRCDCRCG
1 month−52.7%+47.8%−54.2%+54.2%+1.5 pts−6.4 pts
3 months−60.0%+5.8%−32.8%+32.8%−27.2 pts−27.0 pts
6 months−62.7%−65.4%+43.0%−43.0%−105.6 pts−22.4 pts
1 yearnot published−84.4%not published−64.5%not published−19.9 pts
Since launch−91.3%−90.2%+57.3%−87.6%−148.6 pts−2.6 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
CRCD and CRCG on the same fields, as of Sep 11, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
CRCD
T-REX 2X INVERSE CRCL DAILY TARGET ETF
Aims to return twice the opposite of the daily move of CRCL
CRCG
Leverage Shares 2X Long CRCL Daily ETF
Aims to return twice the daily move of CRCL
IssuerT-REXLeverage Shares
Sets out to return-2x+2x
OnCRCLCRCL
Segmentcompanycompany
Fund returned, 3 months−60.0%+5.8%
Underlying returned, 3 months+16.4%+16.4%
What the stated multiple implies, 3 months−32.8%+32.8%
Difference from stated, 3 months−27.2 pts−27.0 pts
Fund returned, 1 year or since launch−91.3%−84.4%
Difference from stated, over that window−148.6 pts−19.9 pts
Underlying volatility89%89%
Difference over the days both have tradedno shared window−6.4 pts
Expense ratio1.50%0.78%
LaunchedSep 26, 2025Aug 11, 2025

CRCD in plain words

Three months to Sep 11, 2026: CRCD returned −60.0% where its own daily promise gave −59.5%, 0.5 points short. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and −2 times CRCL's 16.4% implies −32.8%, which makes CRCD look 27.2 points short. 26.8 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any −2 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. CRCD aims to return -2 times CRCL's move each day, then resets. Over one day it does that. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not -2 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more. CRCL moved at 89% annualized over that window. That is what decides how far the two figures separate: the same fund on a calm underlying and a violent one is a different product.

CRCG in plain words

Three months to Sep 11, 2026: CRCG returned +5.8% where its own daily promise gave +10.8%, 5.0 points short. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and +2 times CRCL's 16.4% implies +32.8%, which makes CRCG look 27.0 points short. 21.9 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any +2 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. CRCG aims to return +2 times CRCL's move each day, then resets. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not +2 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more.

Questions people ask

Which came closer to its stated multiple, CRCD or CRCG?
Over the window to Sep 11, 2026, CRCD finished 27.2 points from what its multiple implies and CRCG finished 27.0 points from its own, so CRCG came closer. Neither figure predicts the next window: it depends on how much the underlying moves about.
Are CRCD and CRCG levered on the same thing?
Yes. Both are levered on CRCL, CRCD at -2 times and CRCG at +2 times the daily move.
Which one decays faster, CRCD or CRCG?
Decay follows how much the underlying moves about. Over this window CRCD’s moved at 89% annualized and CRCG’s at 89%, so CRCD has the rougher ride and, at the same multiple, loses more to compounding.
Can I hold CRCD or CRCG for a year?
Both reset every day, so the multiple in the name applies to a single day and the daily results compound. Over a year the total is not the multiple times the year’s move, and in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less. ETFIQ makes no recommendation either way.
Which is cheaper, CRCD or CRCG?
CRCD charges 1.50% a year and CRCG charges 0.78%, so CRCG is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

CRCD against CRCG, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 11, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, CRCD against CRCG, data as of Sep 11, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/leverage/CRCD-CRCG Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources