Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

CONI vs CONX: which held to its multiple?

Over three months against its own daily promise, CONI finished 1.1 points short and CONX 4.0 points short.

GraniteShares 2x Short COIN Daily ETF and Direxion Daily COIN Bull 2X ETF, side by side, leveraged ETFs on ETFIQ.

−44.4%CONI returned, 3 months
+2.7%CONX returned, 3 months
−25.0 ptsCONI from its stated multiple
−16.7 ptsCONX from its stated multiple

ETFIQ Decay Resistance Score: CONX scores higher

Did it keep up with its own daily multiple, compounded day by day?

CONI 10.3CONX 220.4, the lowest in this set99.6, the highest

A percentile among the 121 inverse ETFs over three months. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All leveraged ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed

CONI25 pts short of its label · 3 months to Sep 11, 2026
COIN +9.7% ×2 implies−19.4%CONI returned−44.4%COIN +9.7% ×2 implies−19.4%CONI returned−44.4%
CONX16.7 pts short of its label · 3 months to Sep 11, 2026
COIN +9.7% ×2 implies+19.4%CONX returned+2.7%COIN +9.7% ×2 implies+19.4%CONX returned+2.7%

Performance, window by window

CONI and CONX over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnMultiple would giveDifference
CONICONXCONICONXCONICONX
1 month−39.8%+29.7%−35.2%+35.2%−4.6 pts−5.5 pts
3 months−44.4%+2.7%−19.4%+19.4%−25.0 pts−16.7 pts
6 months−42.3%−40.9%+20.7%−20.7%−63.0 pts−20.1 pts
1 year−33.2%not published+91.8%not published−125.0 ptsnot published
Since launch−93.8%−72.7%−14.8%−63.8%−79.1 pts−9.0 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
CONI and CONX on the same fields, as of Sep 11, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
CONI
GraniteShares 2x Short COIN Daily ETF
Aims to return twice the opposite of the daily move of Coinbase Global (COIN)
CONX
Direxion Daily COIN Bull 2X ETF
Aims to return twice the daily move of Coinbase Global (COIN)
IssuerGraniteSharesDirexion
Sets out to return-2x+2x
OnCOINCOIN
Segmentcompanycompany
Fund returned, 3 months−44.4%+2.7%
Underlying returned, 3 months+9.7%+9.7%
What the stated multiple implies, 3 months−19.4%+19.4%
Difference from stated, 3 months−25.0 pts−16.7 pts
Fund returned, 1 year or since launch−33.2%−72.7%
Difference from stated, over that window−125.0 pts−9.0 pts
Underlying volatility71%71%
Difference over the days both have tradedno shared window−5.5 pts
Expense ratio1.15%0.97%
LaunchedSep 4, 2024Nov 19, 2025

CONI in plain words

Three months to Sep 11, 2026: CONI returned −44.4% where its own daily promise gave −43.2%, 1.1 points short. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and −2 times COIN's 9.7% implies −19.4%, which makes CONI look 25.0 points short. 23.9 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any −2 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. CONI aims to return -2 times COIN's move each day, then resets. Over one day it does that. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not -2 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more. COIN moved at 71% annualized over that window. That is what decides how far the two figures separate: the same fund on a calm underlying and a violent one is a different product.

CONX in plain words

Three months to Sep 11, 2026: CONX returned +2.7% where its own daily promise gave +6.7%, 4.0 points short. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and +2 times COIN's 9.7% implies +19.4%, which makes CONX look 16.7 points short. 12.7 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any +2 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. CONX aims to return +2 times COIN's move each day, then resets. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not +2 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more.

Questions people ask

Which came closer to its stated multiple, CONI or CONX?
Over the window to Sep 11, 2026, CONI finished 25.0 points from what its multiple implies and CONX finished 16.7 points from its own, so CONX came closer. Neither figure predicts the next window: it depends on how much the underlying moves about.
Are CONI and CONX levered on the same thing?
Yes. Both are levered on Coinbase Global, CONI at -2 times and CONX at +2 times the daily move.
Which one decays faster, CONI or CONX?
Decay follows how much the underlying moves about. Over this window CONI’s moved at 71% annualized and CONX’s at 71%, so CONI has the rougher ride and, at the same multiple, loses more to compounding.
Can I hold CONI or CONX for a year?
Both reset every day, so the multiple in the name applies to a single day and the daily results compound. Over a year the total is not the multiple times the year’s move, and in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less. ETFIQ makes no recommendation either way.
Which is cheaper, CONI or CONX?
CONI charges 1.15% a year and CONX charges 0.97%, so CONX is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

CONI against CONX, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 11, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, CONI against CONX, data as of Sep 11, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/leverage/CONI-CONX Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources