Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

COIA vs CONI: which held to its multiple?

Over three months against its own daily promise, COIA finished 4.8 points short and CONI 1.1 points short.

ProShares Ultra COIN and GraniteShares 2x Short COIN Daily ETF, side by side, leveraged ETFs on ETFIQ.

+1.8%COIA returned, 3 months
−44.4%CONI returned, 3 months
−17.6 ptsCOIA from its stated multiple
−25.0 ptsCONI from its stated multiple

ETFIQ Decay Resistance Score: COIA scores higher

Did it keep up with its own daily multiple, compounded day by day?

COIA 16CONI 10.30.1, the lowest in this set99.9, the highest

A percentile among the 391 leveraged ETFs, long, over three months. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All leveraged ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed

COIA17.6 pts short of its label · 3 months to Sep 11, 2026
COIN +9.7% ×2 implies+19.4%COIA returned+1.8%COIN +9.7% ×2 implies+19.4%COIA returned+1.8%
CONI25 pts short of its label · 3 months to Sep 11, 2026
COIN +9.7% ×2 implies−19.4%CONI returned−44.4%COIN +9.7% ×2 implies−19.4%CONI returned−44.4%

Performance, window by window

COIA and CONI over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnMultiple would giveDifference
COIACONICOIACONICOIACONI
1 month+29.5%−39.8%+35.2%−35.2%−5.7 pts−4.6 pts
3 months+1.8%−44.4%+19.4%−19.4%−17.6 pts−25.0 pts
6 months−42.3%−42.3%−20.7%+20.7%−21.5 pts−63.0 pts
1 year−85.3%−33.2%−91.8%+91.8%+6.5 pts−125.0 pts
Since launch−84.6%−93.8%−88.8%−14.8%+4.2 pts−79.1 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
COIA and CONI on the same fields, as of Sep 11, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
COIA
ProShares Ultra COIN
Aims to return twice the daily move of Coinbase Global (COIN)
CONI
GraniteShares 2x Short COIN Daily ETF
Aims to return twice the opposite of the daily move of Coinbase Global (COIN)
IssuerProSharesGraniteShares
Sets out to return+2x-2x
OnCOINCOIN
Segmentcompanycompany
Fund returned, 3 months+1.8%−44.4%
Underlying returned, 3 months+9.7%+9.7%
What the stated multiple implies, 3 months+19.4%−19.4%
Difference from stated, 3 months−17.6 pts−25.0 pts
Fund returned, 1 year or since launch−85.3%−33.2%
Difference from stated, over that window+6.5 pts−125.0 pts
Underlying volatility71%71%
Difference over the days both have traded−5.7 ptsno shared window
Expense ratio0.95%1.15%
LaunchedSep 10, 2025Sep 4, 2024

COIA in plain words

Three months to Sep 11, 2026: COIA returned +1.8% where its own daily promise gave +6.7%, 4.8 points short. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and +2 times COIN's 9.7% implies +19.4%, which makes COIA look 17.6 points short. 12.7 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any +2 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. COIA aims to return +2 times COIN's move each day, then resets. Over one day it does that. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not +2 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more. COIN moved at 71% annualized over that window. That is what decides how far the two figures separate: the same fund on a calm underlying and a violent one is a different product.

CONI in plain words

Three months to Sep 11, 2026: CONI returned −44.4% where its own daily promise gave −43.2%, 1.1 points short. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and −2 times COIN's 9.7% implies −19.4%, which makes CONI look 25.0 points short. 23.9 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any −2 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. CONI aims to return -2 times COIN's move each day, then resets. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not -2 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more.

Questions people ask

Which came closer to its stated multiple, COIA or CONI?
Over the window to Sep 11, 2026, COIA finished 17.6 points from what its multiple implies and CONI finished 25.0 points from its own, so COIA came closer. Neither figure predicts the next window: it depends on how much the underlying moves about.
Are COIA and CONI levered on the same thing?
Yes. Both are levered on Coinbase Global, COIA at +2 times and CONI at -2 times the daily move.
Which one decays faster, COIA or CONI?
Decay follows how much the underlying moves about. Over this window COIA’s moved at 71% annualized and CONI’s at 71%, so COIA has the rougher ride and, at the same multiple, loses more to compounding.
Can I hold COIA or CONI for a year?
Both reset every day, so the multiple in the name applies to a single day and the daily results compound. Over a year the total is not the multiple times the year’s move, and in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less. ETFIQ makes no recommendation either way.
Which is cheaper, COIA or CONI?
COIA charges 0.95% a year and CONI charges 1.15%, so COIA is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

COIA against CONI, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 11, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, COIA against CONI, data as of Sep 11, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/leverage/COIA-CONI Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources