Data as of .
AMZO vs AMZZ: which held to its multiple?
Over three months against its own daily promise, AMZO finished 1.0 points over and AMZZ 1.7 points short.
ETFIQ Decay Resistance Score: AMZZ scores higher
Did it keep up with its own daily multiple, compounded day by day?
A percentile among the 121 inverse ETFs over three months. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All leveraged ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Multiple would give | Difference | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMZO | AMZZ | AMZO | AMZZ | AMZO | AMZZ | |
| 1 month | +6.9% | −8.5% | +7.9% | −7.9% | −0.9 pts | −0.7 pts |
| 3 months | −24.8% | +9.4% | −15.3% | +15.3% | −9.6 pts | −5.9 pts |
| 6 months | not published | +37.9% | not published | +47.3% | not published | −9.4 pts |
| 1 year | not published | +4.0% | not published | +23.3% | not published | −19.4 pts |
| Since launch | −46.0% | +36.6% | −47.8% | +94.3% | +1.8 pts | −57.7 pts |
| AMZO Tradr 2X Short AMZN Daily ETF Aims to return twice the opposite of the daily move of Amazon.com (AMZN) | AMZZ GraniteShares 2x Long AMZN Daily ETF Aims to return twice the daily move of Amazon.com (AMZN) | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | Tradr | GraniteShares |
| Sets out to return | -2x | +2x |
| On | AMZN | AMZN |
| Segment | company | company |
| Fund returned, 3 months | −24.8% | +9.4% |
| Underlying returned, 3 months | +7.6% | +7.6% |
| What the stated multiple implies, 3 months | −15.3% | +15.3% |
| Difference from stated, 3 months | −9.6 pts | −5.9 pts |
| Fund returned, 1 year or since launch | −46.0% | +4.0% |
| Difference from stated, over that window | +1.8 pts | −19.4 pts |
| Underlying volatility | 44% | 44% |
| Difference over the days both have traded | no shared window | −0.7 pts |
| Expense ratio | 1.49% | 1.15% |
| Launched | Mar 24, 2026 | Mar 18, 2024 |
AMZO in plain words
Three months to Sep 11, 2026: AMZO returned −24.8% where its own daily promise gave −25.9%, 1.0 points over. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and −2 times AMZN's 7.6% implies −15.3%, which makes AMZO look 9.6 points short. 10.6 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any −2 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. AMZO aims to return -2 times AMZN's move each day, then resets. Over one day it does that. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not -2 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more. AMZN moved at 44% annualized over that window. That is what decides how far the two figures separate: the same fund on a calm underlying and a violent one is a different product.
AMZZ in plain words
Three months to Sep 11, 2026: AMZZ returned +9.4% where its own daily promise gave +11.2%, 1.7 points short. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and +2 times AMZN's 7.6% implies +15.3%, which makes AMZZ look 5.9 points short. 4.1 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any +2 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. AMZZ aims to return +2 times AMZN's move each day, then resets. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not +2 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more.
Questions people ask
- Which came closer to its stated multiple, AMZO or AMZZ?
- Over the window to Sep 11, 2026, AMZO finished 9.6 points from what its multiple implies and AMZZ finished 5.9 points from its own, so AMZZ came closer. Neither figure predicts the next window: it depends on how much the underlying moves about.
- Are AMZO and AMZZ levered on the same thing?
- Yes. Both are levered on Amazon.com, AMZO at -2 times and AMZZ at +2 times the daily move.
- Which one decays faster, AMZO or AMZZ?
- Decay follows how much the underlying moves about. Over this window AMZO’s moved at 44% annualized and AMZZ’s at 44%, so AMZO has the rougher ride and, at the same multiple, loses more to compounding.
- Can I hold AMZO or AMZZ for a year?
- Both reset every day, so the multiple in the name applies to a single day and the daily results compound. Over a year the total is not the multiple times the year’s move, and in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less. ETFIQ makes no recommendation either way.
- Which is cheaper, AMZO or AMZZ?
- AMZO charges 1.49% a year and AMZZ charges 1.15%, so AMZZ is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, AMZO against AMZZ, data as of Sep 11, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/leverage/AMZO-AMZZ Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.