Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

AAPD vs AAPU: which held to its multiple?

Over three months against its own daily promise, AAPD finished 1.3 points over and AAPU 2.9 points short.

Direxion Daily AAPL Bear 1X ETF and Direxion Daily AAPL Bull 2X ETF, side by side, leveraged ETFs on ETFIQ.

−13.3%AAPD returned, 3 months
+24.3%AAPU returned, 3 months
+0.9 ptsAAPD from its stated multiple
−4.1 ptsAAPU from its stated multiple

ETFIQ Decay Resistance Score: AAPU scores higher

Did it keep up with its own daily multiple, compounded day by day?

AAPD 36AAPU 410.4, the lowest in this set99.6, the highest

A percentile among the 121 inverse ETFs over three months. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All leveraged ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed

AAPD0.9 pts over its label · 3 months to Sep 11, 2026
AAPL +14.2% ×1 implies−14.2%AAPD returned−13.3%AAPL +14.2% ×1 implies−14.2%AAPD returned−13.3%
AAPU4.1 pts short of its label · 3 months to Sep 11, 2026
AAPL +14.2% ×2 implies+28.5%AAPU returned+24.3%AAPL +14.2% ×2 implies+28.5%AAPU returned+24.3%

Performance, window by window

AAPD and AAPU over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnMultiple would giveDifference
AAPDAAPUAAPDAAPUAAPDAAPU
1 month−8.9%+19.2%−9.9%+19.9%+1.1 pts−0.6 pts
3 months−13.3%+24.3%−14.2%+28.5%+0.9 pts−4.1 pts
6 months−25.4%+63.0%−33.1%+66.2%+7.7 pts−3.2 pts
1 year−31.0%+80.2%−45.0%+90.0%+13.9 pts−9.8 pts
3 years−47.6%+130.0%−91.0%+182.0%+43.4 pts−52.0 pts
Since launch−52.4%+132.9%not meaningfulnot meaningfulnot meaningfulnot meaningful
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
AAPD and AAPU on the same fields, as of Sep 11, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
AAPD
Direxion Daily AAPL Bear 1X ETF
Aims to return 1 times the opposite of the daily move of Apple (AAPL)
AAPU
Direxion Daily AAPL Bull 2X ETF
Aims to return twice the daily move of Apple (AAPL)
IssuerDirexionDirexion
Sets out to return-1x+2x
OnAAPLAAPL
Segmentcompanycompany
Fund returned, 3 months−13.3%+24.3%
Underlying returned, 3 months+14.2%+14.2%
What the stated multiple implies, 3 months−14.2%+28.5%
Difference from stated, 3 months+0.9 pts−4.1 pts
Fund returned, 1 year or since launch−31.0%+80.2%
Difference from stated, over that window+13.9 pts−9.8 pts
Underlying volatility32%32%
Difference over the days both have tradedno shared window−0.6 pts
Expense rationot published0.96%
LaunchedAug 9, 2022Aug 9, 2022

AAPD in plain words

Three months to Sep 11, 2026: AAPD returned −13.3% where its own daily promise gave −14.6%, 1.3 points over. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and −1 times AAPL's 14.2% implies −14.2%, which makes AAPD look 0.9 points over. 0.4 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any −1 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. AAPD aims to return -1 times AAPL's move each day, then resets. Over one day it does that. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not -1 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more. AAPL moved at 32% annualized over that window. That is what decides how far the two figures separate: the same fund on a calm underlying and a violent one is a different product.

AAPU in plain words

Three months to Sep 11, 2026: AAPU returned +24.3% where its own daily promise gave +27.2%, 2.9 points short. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and +2 times AAPL's 14.2% implies +28.5%, which makes AAPU look 4.1 points short. 1.3 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any +2 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. AAPU aims to return +2 times AAPL's move each day, then resets. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not +2 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more.

Questions people ask

Which came closer to its stated multiple, AAPD or AAPU?
Over the window to Sep 11, 2026, AAPD finished 0.9 points from what its multiple implies and AAPU finished 4.1 points from its own, so AAPD came closer. Neither figure predicts the next window: it depends on how much the underlying moves about.
Are AAPD and AAPU levered on the same thing?
Yes. Both are levered on Apple, AAPD at -1 times and AAPU at +2 times the daily move.
Which one decays faster, AAPD or AAPU?
Decay follows how much the underlying moves about. Over this window AAPD’s moved at 32% annualized and AAPU’s at 32%, so AAPD has the rougher ride and, at the same multiple, loses more to compounding.
Can I hold AAPD or AAPU for a year?
Both reset every day, so the multiple in the name applies to a single day and the daily results compound. Over a year the total is not the multiple times the year’s move, and in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less. ETFIQ makes no recommendation either way.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

AAPD against AAPU, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 11, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, AAPD against AAPU, data as of Sep 11, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/leverage/AAPD-AAPU Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources