Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

AAPB vs AAPD: which held to its multiple?

Over three months against its own daily promise, AAPB finished 2.2 points short and AAPD 1.3 points over.

GraniteShares 2x Long AAPL Daily ETF and Direxion Daily AAPL Bear 1X ETF, side by side, leveraged ETFs on ETFIQ.

+25.0%AAPB returned, 3 months
−13.3%AAPD returned, 3 months
−3.5 ptsAAPB from its stated multiple
+0.9 ptsAAPD from its stated multiple

ETFIQ Decay Resistance Score: AAPB scores higher

Did it keep up with its own daily multiple, compounded day by day?

AAPB 63.2AAPD 360.1, the lowest in this set99.9, the highest

A percentile among the 391 leveraged ETFs, long, over three months. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All leveraged ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed

AAPB3.5 pts short of its label · 3 months to Sep 11, 2026
AAPL +14.2% ×2 implies+28.5%AAPB returned+25.0%AAPL +14.2% ×2 implies+28.5%AAPB returned+25.0%
AAPD0.9 pts over its label · 3 months to Sep 11, 2026
AAPL +14.2% ×1 implies−14.2%AAPD returned−13.3%AAPL +14.2% ×1 implies−14.2%AAPD returned−13.3%

Performance, window by window

AAPB and AAPD over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnMultiple would giveDifference
AAPBAAPDAAPBAAPDAAPBAAPD
1 month+20.0%−8.9%+19.9%−9.9%+0.1 pts+1.1 pts
3 months+25.0%−13.3%+28.5%−14.2%−3.5 pts+0.9 pts
6 months+64.4%−25.4%+66.2%−33.1%−1.7 pts+7.7 pts
1 year+83.7%−31.0%+90.0%−45.0%−6.2 pts+13.9 pts
3 years+121.8%−47.6%+182.0%−91.0%−60.2 pts+43.4 pts
Since launch+115.3%−52.4%not meaningfulnot meaningfulnot meaningfulnot meaningful
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
AAPB and AAPD on the same fields, as of Sep 11, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
AAPB
GraniteShares 2x Long AAPL Daily ETF
Aims to return twice the daily move of Apple (AAPL)
AAPD
Direxion Daily AAPL Bear 1X ETF
Aims to return 1 times the opposite of the daily move of Apple (AAPL)
IssuerGraniteSharesDirexion
Sets out to return+2x-1x
OnAAPLAAPL
Segmentcompanycompany
Fund returned, 3 months+25.0%−13.3%
Underlying returned, 3 months+14.2%+14.2%
What the stated multiple implies, 3 months+28.5%−14.2%
Difference from stated, 3 months−3.5 pts+0.9 pts
Fund returned, 1 year or since launch+83.7%−31.0%
Difference from stated, over that window−6.2 pts+13.9 pts
Underlying volatility32%32%
Difference over the days both have traded+0.1 ptsno shared window
Expense ratio1.15%not published
LaunchedAug 9, 2022Aug 9, 2022

AAPB in plain words

Three months to Sep 11, 2026: AAPB returned +25.0% where its own daily promise gave +27.2%, 2.2 points short. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and +2 times AAPL's 14.2% implies +28.5%, which makes AAPB look 3.5 points short. 1.3 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any +2 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. AAPB aims to return +2 times AAPL's move each day, then resets. Over one day it does that. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not +2 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more. AAPL moved at 32% annualized over that window. That is what decides how far the two figures separate: the same fund on a calm underlying and a violent one is a different product.

AAPD in plain words

Three months to Sep 11, 2026: AAPD returned −13.3% where its own daily promise gave −14.6%, 1.3 points over. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and −1 times AAPL's 14.2% implies −14.2%, which makes AAPD look 0.9 points over. 0.4 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any −1 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. AAPD aims to return -1 times AAPL's move each day, then resets. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not -1 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more.

Questions people ask

Which came closer to its stated multiple, AAPB or AAPD?
Over the window to Sep 11, 2026, AAPB finished 3.5 points from what its multiple implies and AAPD finished 0.9 points from its own, so AAPD came closer. Neither figure predicts the next window: it depends on how much the underlying moves about.
Are AAPB and AAPD levered on the same thing?
Yes. Both are levered on Apple, AAPB at +2 times and AAPD at -1 times the daily move.
Which one decays faster, AAPB or AAPD?
Decay follows how much the underlying moves about. Over this window AAPB’s moved at 32% annualized and AAPD’s at 32%, so AAPB has the rougher ride and, at the same multiple, loses more to compounding.
Can I hold AAPB or AAPD for a year?
Both reset every day, so the multiple in the name applies to a single day and the daily results compound. Over a year the total is not the multiple times the year’s move, and in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less. ETFIQ makes no recommendation either way.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

AAPB against AAPD, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 11, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, AAPB against AAPD, data as of Sep 11, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/leverage/AAPB-AAPD Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources