Data as of .
AAPB vs IOSX: which held to its multiple?
Over the days both have traded, AAPB finished 0.1 points from its stated multiple and IOSX 0.0.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Multiple would give | Difference | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AAPB | IOSX | AAPB | IOSX | AAPB | IOSX | |
| 1 month | +20.0% | +19.8% | +19.9% | +19.9% | +0.1 pts | 0.0 pts |
| 3 months | +25.0% | not published | +28.5% | not published | −3.5 pts | not published |
| 6 months | +64.4% | not published | +66.2% | not published | −1.7 pts | not published |
| 1 year | +83.7% | not published | +90.0% | not published | −6.2 pts | not published |
| 3 years | +121.8% | not published | +182.0% | not published | −60.2 pts | not published |
| Since launch | +115.3% | +27.4% | not meaningful | +29.9% | not meaningful | −2.5 pts |
| AAPB GraniteShares 2x Long AAPL Daily ETF Aims to return twice the daily move of Apple (AAPL) | IOSX Corgi AAPL 2x Daily ETF Aims to return twice the daily move of Apple (AAPL) | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | GraniteShares | Corgi |
| Sets out to return | +2x | +2x |
| On | AAPL | AAPL |
| Segment | company | company |
| Fund returned, 3 months | +25.0% | +19.8% |
| Underlying returned, 3 months | +14.2% | +9.9% |
| What the stated multiple implies, 3 months | +28.5% | +19.9% |
| Difference from stated, 3 months | −3.5 pts | 0.0 pts |
| Fund returned, 1 year or since launch | +83.7% | +27.4% |
| Difference from stated, over that window | −6.2 pts | −2.5 pts |
| Underlying volatility | 32% | 23% |
| Difference over the days both have traded | +0.1 pts | 0.0 pts |
| Expense ratio | 1.15% | 0.45% |
| Launched | Aug 9, 2022 | Jun 30, 2026 |
AAPB in plain words
Three months to Sep 11, 2026: AAPB returned +25.0% where its own daily promise gave +27.2%, 2.2 points short. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and +2 times AAPL's 14.2% implies +28.5%, which makes AAPB look 3.5 points short. 1.3 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any +2 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. AAPB aims to return +2 times AAPL's move each day, then resets. Over one day it does that. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not +2 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more. AAPL moved at 32% annualized over that window. That is what decides how far the two figures separate: the same fund on a calm underlying and a violent one is a different product.
IOSX in plain words
One month to Sep 11, 2026: IOSX returned +19.8% where its own daily promise gave +20.3%, 0.5 points short. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and +2 times AAPL's 9.9% implies +19.9%, which makes IOSX look 0.0 points short. 0.4 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any +2 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. IOSX aims to return +2 times AAPL's move each day, then resets. AAPL moved at 23% annualized over that window.
Questions people ask
- Which came closer to its stated multiple, AAPB or IOSX?
- Over the window to Sep 11, 2026, AAPB finished 3.5 points from what its multiple implies and IOSX finished 0.0 points from its own, so IOSX came closer. Neither figure predicts the next window: it depends on how much the underlying moves about.
- Are AAPB and IOSX levered on the same thing?
- Yes. Both are levered on Apple, AAPB at +2 times and IOSX at +2 times the daily move.
- Which one decays faster, AAPB or IOSX?
- Decay follows how much the underlying moves about. Over this window AAPB’s moved at 32% annualized and IOSX’s at 23%, so AAPB has the rougher ride and, at the same multiple, loses more to compounding.
- Can I hold AAPB or IOSX for a year?
- Both reset every day, so the multiple in the name applies to a single day and the daily results compound. Over a year the total is not the multiple times the year’s move, and in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less. ETFIQ makes no recommendation either way.
- Which is cheaper, AAPB or IOSX?
- AAPB charges 1.15% a year and IOSX charges 0.45%, so IOSX is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, AAPB against IOSX, data as of Sep 11, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/leverage/AAPB-IOSX Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.