Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

XLUI vs XLVI: which paid, and which earned it?

Over the year XLUI paid 13.6% of its price in cash against XLVI’s 13.0%, though XLVI returned more with it reinvested.

State Street(R) Utilities Select Sector SPDR(R) Premium Income ETF and State Street(R) Health Care Select Sector SPDR(R) Premium Income ETF.

13.6%XLUI cash paid, 1 year
13.0%XLVI cash paid, 1 year
+2.0%XLUI total return, 1 year
+17.9%XLVI total return, 1 year

ETFIQ Return Stability Score: XLVI scores higher

Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?

XLUI 52.9XLVI 57.33.8, the lowest in this set96.8, the highest

A percentile among the 173 income ETFs writing on an index or proxy. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed

XLUI1.9 pts ahead of XLU · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
XLU+0.1%XLUI+2.0%1.9 pts ahead of XLUTotal return, distributions reinvestedXLU+0.1%XLUI+2.0%1.9 pts ahead of XLU
XLVI6.7 pts behind XLV · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
XLV+24.6%XLVI+17.9%13.0% of it arrived as cash6.7 pts behind XLVTotal return, distributions reinvestedXLV+24.6%XLVI+17.9%6.7 pts behind XLV

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, XLUI and XLVI hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions XLUI and XLVI both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingXLUIXLVI
SSI US GOV MONEY MARKET CLASS0.25%0.40%
Only in each
Only in XLUIOnly in XLVI
STATE STREET UTILITIES SELECT 100.35%STATE STREET HEALTH CARE SELEC 100.46%
STATE STREET UTILITIES SELECT OCT26 43 CALL -0.12%STATE STREET HEALTH CARE SELEC OCT26 173 CALL -0.02%
STATE STREET UTILITIES SELECT OCT26 42 CALL -0.48%STATE STREET HEALTH CARE SELEC OCT26 170 CALL -0.04%
STATE STREET HEALTH CARE SELEC OCT26 172 CALL -0.80%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 18, 2026.

Performance, window by window

XLUI and XLVI over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
XLUIXLVIXLUIXLVIXLUIXLVI
3 months−5.3%+6.9%2.9%3.1%+2.3 pts−6.3 pts
6 months−1.9%+12.2%6.8%6.4%+4.8 pts−4.6 pts
1 year+2.0%+17.9%13.6%13.0%+1.9 pts−6.7 pts
Since launch+2.4%+21.1%14.7%14.7%+3.2 pts−6.5 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
XLUI and XLVI on the same fields, as of Sep 18, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
XLUI
State Street(R) Utilities Select Sector SPDR(R) Premium Income ETF
Covered call on XLU, paying monthly
XLVI
State Street(R) Health Care Select Sector SPDR(R) Premium Income ETF
Covered call on XLV, paying monthly
IssuerState StreetState Street
Strategycovered callcovered call
BenchmarkUtilities sector (XLU)Health care sector (XLV)
Paysmonthlymonthly
Payout rate, annualized11.8%13.1%
Expense ratio0.35%0.35%
Cash paid, 1 year13.6%13.0%
Price change, 1 year−11.3%+4.0%
Total return, 1 year+2.0%+17.9%
Benchmark return, 1 year+0.1%+24.6%
Ahead or behind+1.9 pts−6.7 pts
Return of capital, latest estimatenot publishednot published
Age415 days415 days
Net assets$55m$27m

XLUI in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, XLUI paid 13.6% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 11.3%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +2.0%. Utilities sector (XLU) returned +0.1% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 1.9 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 11.8%, paid monthly.

XLVI in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, XLVI paid 13.0% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 4.0%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +17.9%. Health care sector (XLV) returned +24.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 6.7 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 13.1%, paid monthly.

Questions people ask

Which paid more, XLUI or XLVI?
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, XLUI paid 13.6% of its starting price in cash and XLVI paid 13.0%, so XLUI paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, XLUI or XLVI?
With every distribution reinvested, XLUI returned +2.0% and XLVI returned +17.9% over the year to Sep 18, 2026, so XLVI returned more.
Which is cheaper, XLUI or XLVI?
XLUI charges 0.35% a year and XLVI charges 0.35%, so XLUI is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

XLUI against XLVI, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, XLUI against XLVI, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/xlui-vs-xlvi Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources