Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

XLSI vs XLUI: which paid, and which earned it?

Over the year XLUI paid 13.6% of its price in cash against XLSI’s 11.8%, though XLSI returned more with it reinvested.

State Street(R) Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR(R) Premium Income ETF and State Street(R) Utilities Select Sector SPDR(R) Premium Income ETF.

11.8%XLSI cash paid, 1 year
13.6%XLUI cash paid, 1 year
+5.5%XLSI total return, 1 year
+2.0%XLUI total return, 1 year

ETFIQ Return Stability Score: XLSI scores higher

Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?

XLSI 67.3XLUI 52.93.8, the lowest in this set96.8, the highest

A percentile among the 173 income ETFs writing on an index or proxy. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed

XLSI12.5 pts ahead of XLY · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
XLY−6.9%XLSI+5.5%11.8% of it arrived as cash12.5 pts ahead of XLYTotal return, distributions reinvestedXLY−6.9%XLSI+5.5%12.5 pts ahead of XLY
XLUI1.9 pts ahead of XLU · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
XLU+0.1%XLUI+2.0%13.6% cash1.9 pts ahead of XLUTotal return, distributions reinvestedXLU+0.1%XLUI+2.0%1.9 pts ahead of XLU

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, XLSI and XLUI hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions XLSI and XLUI both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingXLSIXLUI
SSI US GOV MONEY MARKET CLASS0.83%0.25%
Only in each
Only in XLSIOnly in XLUI
STATE STREET CONSUMER STAPLES 99.58%STATE STREET UTILITIES SELECT 100.35%
STATE STREET CONSUMER STAPLES OCT26 86 CALL -0.10%STATE STREET UTILITIES SELECT OCT26 43 CALL -0.12%
STATE STREET CONSUMER STAPLES OCT26 85 CALL -0.30%STATE STREET UTILITIES SELECT OCT26 42 CALL -0.48%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 18, 2026.

Performance, window by window

XLSI and XLUI over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
XLSIXLUIXLSIXLUIXLSIXLUI
3 months+1.2%−5.3%3.1%2.9%+6.3 pts+2.3 pts
6 months+4.9%−1.9%6.2%6.8%+1.4 pts+4.8 pts
1 year+5.5%+2.0%11.8%13.6%+12.5 pts+1.9 pts
Since launch+4.8%+2.4%12.7%14.7%+4.5 pts+3.2 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
XLSI and XLUI on the same fields, as of Sep 18, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
XLSI
State Street(R) Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR(R) Premium Income ETF
Covered call on XLY, paying monthly
XLUI
State Street(R) Utilities Select Sector SPDR(R) Premium Income ETF
Covered call on XLU, paying monthly
IssuerState StreetState Street
Strategycovered callcovered call
BenchmarkConsumer discretionary (XLY)Utilities sector (XLU)
Paysmonthlymonthly
Payout rate, annualized9.3%11.8%
Expense ratio0.35%0.35%
Cash paid, 1 year11.8%13.6%
Price change, 1 year−6.5%−11.3%
Total return, 1 year+5.5%+2.0%
Benchmark return, 1 year−6.9%+0.1%
Ahead or behind+12.5 pts+1.9 pts
Return of capital, latest estimatenot publishednot published
Age415 days415 days
Net assets$20m$55m

XLSI in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, XLSI paid 11.8% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 6.5%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +5.5%. Consumer discretionary (XLY) returned −6.9% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 12.5 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 9.3%, paid monthly.

XLUI in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, XLUI paid 13.6% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 11.3%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +2.0%. Utilities sector (XLU) returned +0.1% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 1.9 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 11.8%, paid monthly.

Questions people ask

Which paid more, XLSI or XLUI?
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, XLSI paid 11.8% of its starting price in cash and XLUI paid 13.6%, so XLUI paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, XLSI or XLUI?
With every distribution reinvested, XLSI returned +5.5% and XLUI returned +2.0% over the year to Sep 18, 2026, so XLSI returned more.
Which is cheaper, XLSI or XLUI?
XLSI charges 0.35% a year and XLUI charges 0.35%, so XLSI is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

XLSI against XLUI, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, XLSI against XLUI, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/xlsi-vs-xlui Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources