Data as of .
TPRY vs YMAG: which paid, and which earned it?
TPRY and YMAG both write options for income.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, TPRY and YMAG hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in TPRY | Only in YMAG |
|---|---|
| Micron Technology Inc 13.23% | YieldMax NVDA Option Income Strategy ETF 14.58% |
| Amazon.com Inc 12.40% | YieldMax AAPL Option Income Strategy ETF 14.24% |
| Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Ltd 8.48% | YieldMax Tsla Option Income ETF 14.21% |
| Alphabet Inc 6.91% | YieldMax Amzn Option Income ETF 14.11% |
| Meta Platforms Inc 5.35% | YieldMax GOOGL Option Income Strategy ETF 14.11% |
| Uber Technologies Inc 5.23% | YieldMax Meta Option Income Strategy ETF 13.99% |
| Apple Inc 4.91% | YieldMax MSFT Option Income Strategy ETF 13.90% |
| Vistra Corp 4.57% | First American Government Obligations Fund 12/01/2031 0.87% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 21, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TPRY | YMAG | TPRY | YMAG | TPRY | YMAG | |
| 3 months | −5.9% | +6.1% | 3.5% | 9.4% | −8.2 pts | −1.6 pts |
| 6 months | +11.9% | +15.4% | 8.1% | 21.1% | −6.1 pts | −5.3 pts |
| 1 year | not published | +9.7% | not published | 35.5% | not published | −1.5 pts |
| Since launch | +2.1% | +70.7% | 7.4% | 89.1% | −9.3 pts | −34.1 pts |
| TPRY VistaShares Target 15 TEPRTantrum Contrarian Distribution ETF Covered call on SPY, paying monthly | YMAG YieldMax(R) Magnificent 7 Fund of Option Income ETFs Synthetic covered call on MAGS, paying weekly | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | VistaShares | YieldMax |
| Strategy | covered call | synthetic covered call |
| Benchmark | S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy | Magnificent Seven (MAGS) |
| Pays | monthly | weekly |
| Payout rate, annualized | 15.3% | 30.9% |
| Expense ratio | 0.95% | 1.34% |
| Cash paid, 1 year | 7.4% (since launch on Feb 26, 2026) | 35.5% |
| Price change, 1 year | −5.4% | −28.1% |
| Total return, 1 year | +2.1% (since launch on Feb 26, 2026) | +9.7% |
| Benchmark return, 1 year | +11.4% | +11.2% |
| Ahead or behind | −9.3 pts | −1.5 pts |
| Return of capital, latest estimate | not published | 80% |
| Age | 204 days | 962 days |
| Net assets | $4m | $297m |
TPRY in plain words
Over the period since launch on Feb 26, 2026 to Sep 18, 2026, TPRY paid 7.4% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 5.4%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +2.1%. S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy returned +11.4% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 9.3 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 15.3%, paid monthly.
YMAG in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, YMAG paid 35.5% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 28.1%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +9.7%. Magnificent Seven (MAGS) returned +11.2% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 1.5 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 30.9%, paid weekly. YieldMax estimates that 80% of the distribution paid Sep 17, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).
Questions people ask
- Which is cheaper, TPRY or YMAG?
- TPRY charges 0.95% a year and YMAG charges 1.34%, so TPRY is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, TPRY against YMAG, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/tpry-vs-ymag Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.