Data as of .
TCAL vs YSPC: which paid, and which earned it?
TCAL and YSPC both write options for income.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, TCAL and YSPC hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in TCAL | Only in YSPC |
|---|---|
| DANAHER CORP 2.01% | United States Treasury Bill 07/08/2027 43.24% |
| WATERS CORP 1.97% | United States Treasury Bill 02/18/2027 34.02% |
| VERALTO CORP 1.87% | United States Treasury Note/Bond 2.375% 05/15/2027 16.09% |
| WASTE CONNECTIONS INC 1.80% | SPCX 10/16/2026 150.01 C 6.39% |
| YUM BRANDS INC 1.72% | First American Government Obligations Fund 12/01/2031 5.82% |
| MCDONALD S CORP 1.70% | SPACE EX CLL OPT 09/26 162.500 0.62% |
| VISA INC-CLASS A SHARES 1.69% | SPACE EX CLL OPT 09/26 157.500 0.07% |
| LINDE PLC 1.63% | SPACE EX CLL OPT 09/26 152.500 -0.15% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Sep 21, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TCAL | YSPC | TCAL | YSPC | TCAL | YSPC | |
| 3 months | +4.2% | not published | 3.5% | not published | +1.9 pts | not published |
| 6 months | +5.3% | not published | 6.3% | not published | −12.7 pts | not published |
| 1 year | +3.0% | not published | 11.4% | not published | −13.5 pts | not published |
| Since launch | +3.9% | +6.4% | 15.2% | 10.9% | −32.7 pts | +5.3 pts |
| TCAL T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Premium Income ETF Covered call on SPY, paying monthly | YSPC YieldMax(R) [SpaceX] Option Income Strategy ETF Synthetic covered call on SPY, paying weekly | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | T. Rowe Price | YieldMax |
| Strategy | covered call | synthetic covered call |
| Benchmark | S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy | S&P 500 (SPY), used as the proxy |
| Pays | monthly | weekly |
| Payout rate, annualized | 9.4% | 63.0% |
| Expense ratio | 0.34% | 1.01% |
| Cash paid, 1 year | 11.4% | 10.9% (since launch on Jul 15, 2026) |
| Price change, 1 year | −8.6% | −5.3% |
| Total return, 1 year | +3.0% | +6.4% (since launch on Jul 15, 2026) |
| Benchmark return, 1 year | +16.6% | +1.2% |
| Ahead or behind | −13.5 pts | +5.3 pts |
| Return of capital, latest estimate | not published | 0% |
| Age | 540 days | 65 days |
| Net assets | $276m | $32m |
TCAL in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, TCAL paid 11.4% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 8.6%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +3.0%. S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy returned +16.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 13.5 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 9.4%, paid monthly.
YSPC in plain words
Over the period since launch on Jul 15, 2026 to Sep 18, 2026, YSPC paid 10.9% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 5.3%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +6.4%. S&P 500 (SPY), used as the proxy returned +1.2% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 5.3 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 63.0%, paid weekly. YieldMax estimates that 0% of the distribution paid Sep 18, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).
Questions people ask
- Which is cheaper, TCAL or YSPC?
- TCAL charges 0.34% a year and YSPC charges 1.01%, so TCAL is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, TCAL against YSPC, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/tcal-vs-yspc Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.