Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

RECI vs ULTY: which paid, and which earned it?

RECI and ULTY both write options for income.

Columbia Research Enhanced Core Premium Income ETF and YieldMax(R) Ultra Option Income Strategy ETF.

0.7%RECI cash paid, 1 year
44.9%ULTY cash paid, 1 year
+2.4%RECI total return, 1 year
−7.8%ULTY total return, 1 year
RECI0.8 pts ahead of SPY · since launch to Sep 18, 2026
SPY+1.6%RECI+2.4%0.8 pts ahead of SPYTotal return, distributions reinvestedSPY+1.6%RECI+2.4%0.8 pts ahead of SPY
ULTY24.3 pts behind SPY · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
SPY+16.6%ULTY−7.8%24.3 pts behind SPYTotal return, distributions reinvestedSPY+16.6%ULTY−7.8%24.3 pts behind SPY

Performance, window by window

RECI and ULTY over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
RECIULTYRECIULTYRECIULTY
3 monthsnot published−1.1%not published13.7%not published−3.3 pts
6 monthsnot published+14.0%not published30.1%not published−4.0 pts
1 yearnot published−7.8%not published44.9%not published−24.3 pts
Since launch+2.4%+10.7%0.7%86.9%+0.8 pts−44.1 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
RECI and ULTY on the same fields, as of Sep 18, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
RECI
Columbia Research Enhanced Core Premium Income ETF
Covered call on SPY
ULTY
YieldMax(R) Ultra Option Income Strategy ETF
Synthetic covered call on SPY, paying weekly
IssuerColumbiaYieldMax
Strategycovered callsynthetic covered call
BenchmarkS&P 500 (SPY)S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy
Paysnot establishedweekly
Payout rate, annualized8.0%59.8%
Expense ratio0.30%1.30%
Cash paid, 1 year0.7% (since launch on Jul 14, 2026)44.9%
Price change, 1 year+1.7%−54.1%
Total return, 1 year+2.4% (since launch on Jul 14, 2026)−7.8%
Benchmark return, 1 year+1.6%+16.6%
Ahead or behind+0.8 pts−24.3 pts
Return of capital, latest estimatenot published100%
Age66 days932 days
Net assetsnot published$721m

RECI in plain words

Over the period since launch on Jul 14, 2026 to Sep 18, 2026, RECI paid 0.7% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 1.7%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +2.4%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +1.6% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 0.8 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 8.0%, paid periodically.

ULTY in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, ULTY paid 44.9% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 54.1%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −7.8%. S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy returned +16.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 24.3 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 59.8%, paid weekly. YieldMax estimates that 100% of the distribution paid Sep 17, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).

Questions people ask

Which is cheaper, RECI or ULTY?
RECI charges 0.30% a year and ULTY charges 1.30%, so RECI is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

RECI against ULTY, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, RECI against ULTY, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/reci-vs-ulty Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources