Data as of .
QUSA vs YSPC: which paid, and which earned it?
QUSA and YSPC both write options for income.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QUSA | YSPC | QUSA | YSPC | QUSA | YSPC | |
| 3 months | −1.9% | not published | 3.6% | not published | −3.6 pts | not published |
| 6 months | +10.4% | not published | 7.8% | not published | −4.3 pts | not published |
| 1 year | +3.5% | not published | 13.8% | not published | −11.7 pts | not published |
| Since launch | +4.9% | +6.4% | 15.1% | 10.9% | −25.8 pts | +5.3 pts |
| QUSA VistaShares Target 15 USA Quality Income ETF Covered call on QUAL, paying monthly | YSPC YieldMax(R) [SpaceX] Option Income Strategy ETF Synthetic covered call on SPY, paying weekly | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | VistaShares | YieldMax |
| Strategy | covered call | synthetic covered call |
| Benchmark | USA Quality (QUAL), used as the quality proxy | S&P 500 (SPY), used as the proxy |
| Pays | monthly | weekly |
| Payout rate, annualized | 15.3% | 63.0% |
| Expense ratio | 0.97% | 1.01% |
| Cash paid, 1 year | 13.8% | 10.9% (since launch on Jul 15, 2026) |
| Price change, 1 year | −11.0% | −5.3% |
| Total return, 1 year | +3.5% | +6.4% (since launch on Jul 15, 2026) |
| Benchmark return, 1 year | +15.2% | +1.2% |
| Ahead or behind | −11.7 pts | +5.3 pts |
| Return of capital, latest estimate | not published | 0% |
| Age | 500 days | 65 days |
| Net assets | $22m | $32m |
QUSA in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, QUSA paid 13.8% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 11.0%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +3.5%. USA Quality (QUAL), used as the quality proxy returned +15.2% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 11.7 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 15.3%, paid monthly.
YSPC in plain words
Over the period since launch on Jul 15, 2026 to Sep 18, 2026, YSPC paid 10.9% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 5.3%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +6.4%. S&P 500 (SPY), used as the proxy returned +1.2% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 5.3 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 63.0%, paid weekly. YieldMax estimates that 0% of the distribution paid Sep 18, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).
Questions people ask
- Which is cheaper, QUSA or YSPC?
- QUSA charges 0.97% a year and YSPC charges 1.01%, so QUSA is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, QUSA against YSPC, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/qusa-vs-yspc Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.