Data as of Nov 4, 2026.
QLDY vs YMAG: Dividend Yield & Total Return
Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, QLDY paid 35.3% of its price in cash against YMAG’s 33.4%, and returned more with it reinvested.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about QLDY and YMAGNet assets on Nov 3, 2026: $53m for Defiance Nasdaq 100 LightningSpread Income ETF and $268m for YieldMax Magnificent 7 Fund of Option Income ETFs.
3.2 pts behind QQQ
QLDY over 1 year: paid 35.3%, price −27.2%, total +9.1%, QQQ +12.3%, −3.2 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
QQQ
+12.3%
QLDY
+9.1%
35.3% of it arrived as cash
3.2 pts behind QQQ
Total return, distributions reinvested
3.2 pts behind QQQ
QLDY over 1 year: paid 35.3%, price −27.2%, total +9.1%, QQQ +12.3%, −3.2 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
QQQ
+12.3%
QLDY
+9.1%
35.3% as cash
3.2 pts behind QQQ
35.3% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. QLDY over 1 year: paid 35.3%, price −27.2%, total +9.1%, QQQ +12.3%, −3.2 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
Data to Nov 4, 2026.1.2 pts ahead of its own holdings
YMAG over 1 year: paid 33.4%, price −29.4%, total +5.8%, its own holdings +4.6%, +1.2 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
its own holdings
+4.6%
YMAG
+5.8%
33.4% of it arrived as cash
1.2 pts ahead of its own holdings
Total return, distributions reinvested
1.2 pts ahead of its own holdings
YMAG over 1 year: paid 33.4%, price −29.4%, total +5.8%, its own holdings +4.6%, +1.2 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
its own holdings
+4.6%
YMAG
+5.8%
1.2 pts ahead of its own holdings
33.4% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, with zero at the line. YMAG over 1 year: paid 33.4%, price −29.4%, total +5.8%, its own holdings +4.6%, +1.2 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
Data to Nov 4, 2026.Pair scorecard
QLDY costs 0.30 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 3.3 points; YMAG is 5.1 times larger.
Points (pts) are percentage points.
| Measure | QLDY | YMAG |
|---|---|---|
| Paid and earned | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +9.1% | +5.8% |
| Price change, 1 year | fell 27.2% | fell 29.4% |
| Return of capital, issuer estimate | 0% of the Nov 2, 2026 payment | 11% of the Nov 5, 2026 payment |
| Against its benchmark | ||
| Benchmark | Nasdaq-100, measured through QQQ | its own holdings |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 1.04% | 1.34% |
| Net assets, as of Nov 3, 2026 | $53m | $268m |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
How much of its payouts the fund's total return covered, ranked against 167 income ETFs not writing on a single company. 100 is best. How it is computed
One year only, and a ratio of two published numbers: it says nothing about where a distribution came from. All income ETFs ranked by it →
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, QLDY and YMAG hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Nov 4, 2026.
half
0% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ. Cash paid: distributions over the window, as a share of the starting price. Payout rate: the latest payment, annualized, over today’s price.
Window by window
| Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | QLDY | YMAG | QLDY | YMAG | QLDY | YMAG |
| 3 months | −4.5% | +3.3% | 9.5% | 9.1% | −1.1 pts | +0.3 pts |
| 6 months | −3.1% | +1.9% | 18.5% | 18.1% | −2.8 pts | −0.2 pts |
| 1 year | +9.1% | +5.8% | 35.3% | 33.4% | −3.2 pts | +1.2 pts |
| Since launchNot the same days: QLDY Sep 2025 · YMAG Jan 2024 | +13.2% | +70.3% | 39.1% | 91.7% | −3.7 pts | not measured |
QLDY
Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, QLDY paid 35.3% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 27.2%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +9.1%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) returned +12.3% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 3.2 pts. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 19.7%, paid weekly. Defiance estimates that 0% of the distribution paid Nov 2, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice). That is a tax label, not a measure of erosion.
YMAG
Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, YMAG paid 33.4% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 29.4%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +5.8%. YMAG's own holdings, without the options (from its filed holdings, rebalanced at each filing; latest Nov 2, 2026) returned +4.6% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 1.2 pts. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 31.4%, paid weekly. YieldMax estimates that 11% of the distribution paid Nov 5, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice).
Questions people ask
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
It is a place in a set, not a rating or a recommendation.
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, QLDY against YMAG, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/qldy-vs-ymag
ETFIQ. (Nov 4, 2026). QLDY against YMAG. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/income/qldy-vs-ymag
[QLDY against YMAG (ETFIQ, Nov 4, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/income/qldy-vs-ymag)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.