Data as of Nov 4, 2026.

vsOpen in the appCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Income ETFs

QLDY vs YMAG: Dividend Yield & Total Return

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, QLDY paid 35.3% of its price in cash against YMAG’s 33.4%, and returned more with it reinvested.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about QLDY and YMAG

Net assets on Nov 3, 2026: $53m for Defiance Nasdaq 100 LightningSpread Income ETF and $268m for YieldMax Magnificent 7 Fund of Option Income ETFs.

At a glance
35.3%
QLDY cash paid, 1 year
33.4%
YMAG cash paid, 1 year
+9.1%
QLDY total return, 1 year
+5.8%
YMAG total return, 1 year
QLDY · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 3.2 pts behind QQQ
QLDY
+9.1%
QQQ
+12.3%

3.2 pts behind QQQ

QLDY over 1 year: paid 35.3%, price −27.2%, total +9.1%, QQQ +12.3%, −3.2 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

QQQ

+12.3%

QLDY

+9.1%

35.3% of it arrived as cash

3.2 pts behind QQQ

Total return, distributions reinvested

3.2 pts behind QQQ

QLDY over 1 year: paid 35.3%, price −27.2%, total +9.1%, QQQ +12.3%, −3.2 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

QQQ

+12.3%

QLDY

+9.1%

35.3% as cash

3.2 pts behind QQQ

35.3% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. QLDY over 1 year: paid 35.3%, price −27.2%, total +9.1%, QQQ +12.3%, −3.2 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

Data to Nov 4, 2026.
YMAG · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 1.2 pts ahead of its own holdings
YMAG
+5.8%
Own
+4.6%

1.2 pts ahead of its own holdings

YMAG over 1 year: paid 33.4%, price −29.4%, total +5.8%, its own holdings +4.6%, +1.2 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

its own holdings

+4.6%

YMAG

+5.8%

33.4% of it arrived as cash

1.2 pts ahead of its own holdings

Total return, distributions reinvested

1.2 pts ahead of its own holdings

YMAG over 1 year: paid 33.4%, price −29.4%, total +5.8%, its own holdings +4.6%, +1.2 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

its own holdings

+4.6%

YMAG

+5.8%

1.2 pts ahead of its own holdings

33.4% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, with zero at the line. YMAG over 1 year: paid 33.4%, price −29.4%, total +5.8%, its own holdings +4.6%, +1.2 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

Data to Nov 4, 2026.

Pair scorecard

QLDY costs 0.30 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 3.3 points; YMAG is 5.1 times larger.

Points (pts) are percentage points.

QLDY vs YMAG: Dividend Yield & Total Return
MeasureQLDYYMAG
Paid and earned
Total return, 1 year+9.1%+5.8%
Price change, 1 yearfell 27.2%fell 29.4%
Return of capital, issuer estimate0% of the Nov 2, 2026 payment11% of the Nov 5, 2026 payment
Against its benchmark
BenchmarkNasdaq-100, measured through QQQits own holdings
Cost and size
Expense ratio1.04%1.34%
Net assets, as of Nov 3, 2026$53m$268m
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
ETFIQ Distribution Coverage Score · QLDY scores higher How much of what it paid out did its total return cover?
IQ Income Score24.9QLDY23.1YMAG

How much of its payouts the fund's total return covered, ranked against 167 income ETFs not writing on a single company. 100 is best. How it is computed

0.3, the lowest in this set 99.7, the highest

One year only, and a ratio of two published numbers: it says nothing about where a distribution came from. All income ETFs ranked by it →

Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, QLDY and YMAG hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Nov 4, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first QLDY YMAG
Only in one fund ↓
Only in QLDY
Ndx 12/18/2026 2001.44 C 92.84%
United States Treasury Note/bond 2.375% 05/15/2027 0.49%
Exchange Put Opt 11/26 28320 0.15%
Xnd 12/18/2026 10.44 C 0.05%
Nasdaq-1 Put Opt 11/26 28470 -0.24%
Only in YMAG
YieldMax MSFT Option Income Strategy ETF 15.10%
YieldMax AAPL Option Income Strategy ETF 15.04%
YieldMax Amzn Option Income ETF 14.92%
YieldMax Tsla Option Income ETF 14.83%
YieldMax NVDA Option Income Strategy ETF 13.66%
YieldMax Meta Option Income Strategy ETF 13.26%
YieldMax GOOGL Option Income Strategy ETF 12.23%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

QLDY Defiance Nasdaq 100 LightningSpread Income ETF · Option income on QQQ, paying weekly YMAG YieldMax Magnificent 7 Fund of Option Income ETFs · Synthetic covered call on its own holdings, paying weekly
Strategy option income synthetic covered call
Benchmark Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) YMAG's own holdings, without the options (from its filed holdings, rebalanced at each filing; latest Nov 2, 2026)
Pays weekly weekly
Payout rate, annualized 19.7% 31.4%
Expense ratio 1.04% 1.34%
Cash paid, 1 year 35.3% 33.4%
Price change, 1 year −27.2% −29.4%
Total return, 1 year +9.1% +5.8%
Benchmark return, 1 year +12.3% +4.6%
Ahead or behind −3.2 pts +1.2 pts
Return of capital, latest estimate 0% 11%
Age 1.1 years 2.8 years
Net assets, as of Nov 3, 2026 $53m $268m

As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ. Cash paid: distributions over the window, as a share of the starting price. Payout rate: the latest payment, annualized, over today’s price.

Window by window

Window by window: QLDY vs YMAG: Dividend Yield & Total Return
Total returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
WindowQLDYYMAGQLDYYMAGQLDYYMAG
3 months−4.5%+3.3%9.5%9.1%−1.1 pts+0.3 pts
6 months−3.1%+1.9%18.5%18.1%−2.8 pts−0.2 pts
1 year+9.1%+5.8%35.3%33.4%−3.2 pts+1.2 pts
Since launchNot the same days: QLDY Sep 2025 · YMAG Jan 2024+13.2%+70.3%39.1%91.7%−3.7 ptsnot measured

Open this comparison in the app →

Alert

YMAG flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
QLDY

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, QLDY paid 35.3% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 27.2%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +9.1%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) returned +12.3% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 3.2 pts. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 19.7%, paid weekly. Defiance estimates that 0% of the distribution paid Nov 2, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice). That is a tax label, not a measure of erosion.

YMAG

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, YMAG paid 33.4% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 29.4%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +5.8%. YMAG's own holdings, without the options (from its filed holdings, rebalanced at each filing; latest Nov 2, 2026) returned +4.6% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 1.2 pts. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 31.4%, paid weekly. YieldMax estimates that 11% of the distribution paid Nov 5, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice).

Questions people ask

Which paid more, QLDY or YMAG?
Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, QLDY paid 35.3% of its starting price in cash and YMAG paid 33.4%, so QLDY paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, QLDY or YMAG?
With every distribution reinvested, QLDY returned +9.1% and YMAG +5.8% over the year to Nov 4, 2026.
Which is cheaper, QLDY or YMAG?
QLDY charges 1.04% a year and YMAG charges 1.34%, so QLDY is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Sources and dates

Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

It is a place in a set, not a rating or a recommendation.

Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.

Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, QLDY against YMAG, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/qldy-vs-ymag

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.