Data as of .
KIQQ vs LOCT: which paid, and which earned it?
KIQQ and LOCT both write options for income.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, KIQQ and LOCT hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in KIQQ | Only in LOCT |
|---|---|
| +NDXDBHIO/-FED FUNDS 100.58% | TREASURY BILL 98.30% |
| NVIDIA CORP 8.90% | TREASURY BILL 0.43% |
| APPLE INC 8.20% | TREASURY BILL 0.43% |
| MICROSOFT CORP 6.17% | TREASURY BILL 0.42% |
| MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC 5.14% | TREASURY BILL 0.42% |
| AMAZON.COM INC 4.50% | |
| ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES 4.21% | |
| ALPHABET INC-CL A 3.40% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Sep 18, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KIQQ | LOCT | KIQQ | LOCT | KIQQ | LOCT | |
| 3 months | −3.2% | +1.0% | 1.9% | 1.3% | −0.7 pts | −1.2 pts |
| 6 months | +11.9% | +3.9% | 4.5% | 2.6% | −12.3 pts | −14.1 pts |
| 1 year | not published | +5.4% | not published | 5.2% | not published | −11.2 pts |
| Since launch | +6.0% | +18.5% | 5.8% | 16.5% | −9.9 pts | −66.4 pts |
| KIQQ KraneShares InspereX Nasdaq Dynamic Buffered High Income Index ETF Buffer with income on QQQ, paying monthly | LOCT Innovator Premium Income 15 Buffer ETF - October Buffer with income on SPY, paying monthly | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | KraneShares | Innovator |
| Strategy | buffer with income | buffer with income |
| Benchmark | Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) | S&P 500 (SPY) |
| Pays | monthly | monthly |
| Payout rate, annualized | 6.3% | 5.2% |
| Expense ratio | 0.79% | 0.79% |
| Cash paid, 1 year | 5.8% (since launch on Jan 7, 2026) | 5.2% |
| Price change, 1 year | −0.1% | +0.1% |
| Total return, 1 year | +6.0% (since launch on Jan 7, 2026) | +5.4% |
| Benchmark return, 1 year | +15.9% | +16.6% |
| Ahead or behind | −9.9 pts | −11.2 pts |
| Return of capital, latest estimate | not published | not published |
| Age | 254 days | 1082 days |
| Net assets | $3m | $11m |
KIQQ in plain words
Over the period since launch on Jan 7, 2026 to Sep 18, 2026, KIQQ paid 5.8% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 0.1%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +6.0%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) returned +15.9% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 9.9 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 6.3%, paid monthly.
LOCT in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, LOCT paid 5.2% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 0.1%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +5.4%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +16.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 11.2 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 5.2%, paid monthly.
Questions people ask
- Which is cheaper, KIQQ or LOCT?
- KIQQ charges 0.79% a year and LOCT charges 0.79%, so KIQQ is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, KIQQ against LOCT, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/kiqq-vs-loct Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.