Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

HEMI vs IVVW: which paid, and which earned it?

HEMI and IVVW both write options for income.

Hartford Equity Premium Income ETF and iShares S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF.

6.0%HEMI cash paid, 1 year
17.5%IVVW cash paid, 1 year
+11.2%HEMI total return, 1 year
+17.2%IVVW total return, 1 year
HEMI3.4 pts behind SPY · since launch to Sep 18, 2026
SPY+14.7%HEMI+11.2%6.0% of it arrived as cash3.4 pts behind SPYTotal return, distributions reinvestedSPY+14.7%HEMI+11.2%3.4 pts behind SPY
IVVW0.6 pts ahead of SPY · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
SPY+16.6%IVVW+17.2%17.5% of it arrived as cash0.6 pts ahead of SPYTotal return, distributions reinvestedSPY+16.6%IVVW+17.2%17.5% as cash0.6 pts ahead of SPY

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, HEMI and IVVW hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Only in each
Only in HEMIOnly in IVVW
NVIDIA Corp 9.11%ISHARES CORE S&P ETF TRUST 101.45%
Alphabet Inc 7.69%USD CASH 0.18%
Apple Inc 5.86%OCT26 SPX C @ 7625.000000 -1.63%
Amazon.com Inc 5.73%
Microsoft Corp 5.72%
Broadcom Inc 4.02%
Meta Platforms Inc 2.66%
JPMorgan Chase & Co 2.42%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Sep 18, 2026.

Performance, window by window

HEMI and IVVW over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
HEMIIVVWHEMIIVVWHEMIIVVW
3 months+0.8%+4.6%2.2%2.6%−1.5 pts+2.4 pts
6 months+13.6%+13.1%4.9%7.9%−4.5 pts−4.9 pts
1 yearnot published+17.2%not published17.5%not published+0.6 pts
Since launch+11.2%+38.9%6.0%39.7%−3.4 pts−14.9 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
HEMI and IVVW on the same fields, as of Sep 18, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
HEMI
Hartford Equity Premium Income ETF
Covered call on SPY, paying monthly
IVVW
iShares S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF
Covered call on SPY, paying monthly
IssuerHartfordiShares
Strategycovered callcovered call
BenchmarkS&P 500 (SPY)S&P 500 (SPY)
Paysmonthlymonthly
Payout rate, annualized9.1%7.6%
Expense ratio0.49%0.25%
Cash paid, 1 year6.0% (since launch on Dec 17, 2025)17.5%
Price change, 1 year+4.9%−2.0%
Total return, 1 year+11.2% (since launch on Dec 17, 2025)+17.2%
Benchmark return, 1 year+14.7%+16.6%
Ahead or behind−3.4 pts+0.6 pts
Return of capital, latest estimatenot publishednot published
Age275 days917 days
Net assets$33m$350m

HEMI in plain words

Over the period since launch on Dec 17, 2025 to Sep 18, 2026, HEMI paid 6.0% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 4.9%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +11.2%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +14.7% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 3.4 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 9.1%, paid monthly.

IVVW in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, IVVW paid 17.5% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 2.0%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +17.2%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +16.6% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 0.6 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 7.6%, paid monthly.

Questions people ask

Which is cheaper, HEMI or IVVW?
HEMI charges 0.49% a year and IVVW charges 0.25%, so IVVW is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

HEMI against IVVW, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, HEMI against IVVW, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/hemi-vs-ivvw Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources