Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

GLDN vs KGLD: which paid, and which earned it?

GLDN and KGLD both write options for income.

Nicholas Gold Income ETF and Kurv Gold Enhanced Income ETF.

6.7%GLDN cash paid, 1 year
16.0%KGLD cash paid, 1 year
−10.6%GLDN total return, 1 year
+18.9%KGLD total return, 1 year
GLDN1.9 pts ahead of GLD · since launch to Sep 18, 2026
GLD−12.5%GLDN−10.6%1.9 pts ahead of GLDTotal return, distributions reinvestedGLD−12.5%GLDN−10.6%1.9 pts ahead of GLD
KGLD0.6 pts behind GLD · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
GLD+19.5%KGLD+18.9%16.0% of it arrived as cash0.6 pts behind GLDTotal return, distributions reinvestedGLD+19.5%KGLD+18.9%0.6 pts behind GLD

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, GLDN and KGLD hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Only in each
Only in GLDNOnly in KGLD
SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust 30.40%TREASURY BILL 41.06%
SSR Mining Inc 7.03%TREASURY BILL 40.22%
Franco-Nevada Corp 5.93%TREASURY BILL 18.71%
Newmont Corp 5.81%
Kinross Gold Corp 5.80%
Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd 5.66%
Anglogold Ashanti Plc 5.66%
Barrick Mining Corp 5.42%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

Performance, window by window

GLDN and KGLD over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
GLDNKGLDGLDNKGLDGLDNKGLD
3 months+11.4%+2.9%3.7%3.8%+7.8 pts−0.8 pts
6 months+9.4%−4.7%7.5%7.4%+12.3 pts−1.8 pts
1 yearnot published+18.9%not published16.0%not published−0.6 pts
Since launch−10.6%+29.8%6.7%19.2%+1.9 pts−2.0 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
GLDN and KGLD on the same fields, as of Sep 18, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
GLDN
Nicholas Gold Income ETF
Option income on GLD, paying weekly
KGLD
Kurv Gold Enhanced Income ETF
Covered call on GLD, paying monthly
IssuerNicholasKurv
Strategyoption incomecovered call
BenchmarkGold (GLD)Gold (GLD)
Paysweeklymonthly
Payout rate, annualized15.4%15.3%
Expense ratio1.07%1.00%
Cash paid, 1 year6.7% (since launch on Feb 18, 2026)16.0%
Price change, 1 year−17.5%+3.4%
Total return, 1 year−10.6% (since launch on Feb 18, 2026)+18.9%
Benchmark return, 1 year−12.5%+19.5%
Ahead or behind+1.9 pts−0.6 pts
Return of capital, latest estimatenot published86%
Age212 days437 days
Net assets$3m$163m

GLDN in plain words

Over the period since launch on Feb 18, 2026 to Sep 18, 2026, GLDN paid 6.7% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 17.5%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −10.6%. Gold (GLD) returned −12.5% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 1.9 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 15.4%, paid weekly.

KGLD in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, KGLD paid 16.0% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 3.4%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +18.9%. Gold (GLD) returned +19.5% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 0.6 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 15.3%, paid monthly. Kurv estimates that 86% of the distribution paid Sep 3, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).

Questions people ask

Which is cheaper, GLDN or KGLD?
GLDN charges 1.07% a year and KGLD charges 1.00%, so KGLD is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

GLDN against KGLD, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, GLDN against KGLD, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/gldn-vs-kgld Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources