Data as of Nov 4, 2026.

vsOpen in the appCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Income ETFs

FTKI vs RDTY: Dividend Yield & Total Return

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, RDTY paid 35.2% of its price in cash against FTKI’s 12.5%, though FTKI returned more with it reinvested.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about FTKI and RDTY

Net assets on Nov 3, 2026: $25m for First Trust Small Cap BuyWrite Income ETF and $15m for YieldMax R2000 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF.

At a glance
12.5%
FTKI cash paid, 1 year
35.2%
RDTY cash paid, 1 year
+20.3%
FTKI total return, 1 year
+18.8%
RDTY total return, 1 year
FTKI · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 1.3 pts ahead of IWM
FTKI
+20.3%
IWM
+19.0%

1.3 pts ahead of IWM

FTKI over 1 year: paid 12.5%, price +6.9%, total +20.3%, IWM +19.0%, +1.3 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

IWM

+19.0%

FTKI

+20.3%

12.5% of it arrived as cash

1.3 pts ahead of IWM

Total return, distributions reinvested

1.3 pts ahead of IWM

FTKI over 1 year: paid 12.5%, price +6.9%, total +20.3%, IWM +19.0%, +1.3 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

IWM

+19.0%

FTKI

+20.3%

12.5% cash

1.3 pts ahead of IWM

12.5% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. FTKI over 1 year: paid 12.5%, price +6.9%, total +20.3%, IWM +19.0%, +1.3 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

Data to Nov 4, 2026.
RDTY · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 About even with IWM
RDTY
+18.8%
IWM
+19.0%

About even with IWM

RDTY over 1 year: paid 35.2%, price −19.8%, total +18.8%, IWM +19.0%, −0.2 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

IWM

+19.0%

RDTY

+18.8%

35.2% of it arrived as cash

about even with IWM

Total return, distributions reinvested

About even with IWM

RDTY over 1 year: paid 35.2%, price −19.8%, total +18.8%, IWM +19.0%, −0.2 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

IWM

+19.0%

RDTY

+18.8%

35.2% as cash

about even with IWM

35.2% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, with zero at the line. RDTY over 1 year: paid 35.2%, price −19.8%, total +18.8%, IWM +19.0%, −0.2 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

Data to Nov 4, 2026.

Pair scorecard

FTKI costs 0.87 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 1.5 points; FTKI is 1.7 times larger.

Points (pts) are percentage points.

FTKI vs RDTY: Dividend Yield & Total Return
MeasureFTKIRDTY
Paid and earned
Total return, 1 year+20.3%+18.8%
Price change, 1 yearrose 6.9%fell 19.8%
Return of capital, issuer estimate93% of the Oct 30, 2026 payment65% of the Nov 5, 2026 payment
Against its benchmark
BenchmarkRussell 2000, measured through IWMRussell 2000, measured through IWM
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.86%1.73%
Net assets, as of Nov 3, 2026$25m$15m
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
ETFIQ Distribution Coverage Score · FTKI scores higher How much of what it paid out did its total return cover?
IQ Income Score79.9FTKI36.2RDTY

How much of its payouts the fund's total return covered, ranked against 167 income ETFs not writing on a single company. 100 is best. How it is computed

0.3, the lowest in this set 99.7, the highest

One year only, and a ratio of two published numbers: it says nothing about where a distribution came from. All income ETFs ranked by it →

Method

Risk and return

Mar 14, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026 · 85 weekly returns · each against IWM
FTKI RDTY
Return
Total return edge RDTY +24.1% +30.1%
Annualized edge RDTY +14.1% +17.5%
Price return edge FTKI +2.7% −30.9%
Risk
Volatility edge FTKI 11.2% 16.8%
Max drawdown edge FTKI −8.7% −13.1%
Downside capture 44.6% 92.5%
Beta 0.47 0.88
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge FTKI (slight) 0.88 0.81
Sortino edge FTKI (slight) 1.14 1.09
Treynor 0.210 0.154
Calmar edge FTKI 1.62 1.33
Against the benchmark
Alpha +1.3% a year −2.6% a year
Alpha t-stat 0.22 −0.55
Information ratio −0.70 −0.75
Tracking error 12.0% 6.3%
Reading

From Mar 2025 to Oct 2026, RDTY returned more: +30.1% to +24.1%. FTKI swung less: 11.2% to 16.8%. FTKI fell less at its worst: −8.7% to −13.1%.

Full scorecard

19 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: FTKI vs RDTY: Dividend Yield & Total Return
MeasureFTKIRDTYIWMEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+24.1%+30.1%RDTYPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+14.1%+17.5%RDTYTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return+2.7%−30.9%FTKIPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility11.2%16.8%FTKISpread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation8.7%12.4%FTKILike volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−8.7%−13.1%FTKIDeepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Upside capture31.6%77.1%100.0%RDTYShare of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose.
Downside capture44.6%92.5%100.0%FTKIShare of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better.
Beta0.470.881.00FTKI lowerHow far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves.
R squared0.560.881.00Not an edgeShare of its weekly moves its benchmark explains.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.880.81FTKI (slight)Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino1.141.09FTKI (slight)Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Treynor0.2100.1540.183FTKIReturn above Treasury bills per unit of beta.
Calmar1.621.33FTKIAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.
Against the benchmark
BenchmarkIWMIWMIWMThe ETF each fund is measured against.
Alpha+1.3% a year−2.6% a year0.0%Not significantYearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts.
Alpha t-stat0.22−0.55Not an edgeHow sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance.
Alpha range−10.5% to +13.0%−12.0% to +6.8%Both include zeroThe 95% range for the yearly alpha.
Information ratio−0.70−0.75FTKI (slight)Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error.
Tracking error12.0%6.3%0.0%Not an edgeHow far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 85 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, FTKI and RDTY hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Nov 3, 2026 and Nov 4, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first FTKI RDTY
Only in one fund ↓
Only in FTKI
Etsy, Inc. 2.30%
Abercrombie & Fitch Co. (Class A) 2.20%
Maplebear Inc. (Instacart) 2.17%
UiPath, Inc. (Class A) 2.06%
Appian Corporation 1.92%
Encompass Health Corporation 1.92%
Scorpio Tankers Inc. 1.79%
Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd 1.60%
Only in RDTY
RUT 12/18/2026 310.26 C 92.27%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 3.375% 09/15/2027 0.26%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

FTKI First Trust Small Cap BuyWrite Income ETF · Covered call on IWM, paying monthly RDTY YieldMax R2000 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF · 0DTE covered call on IWM, paying weekly
Strategy covered call 0DTE covered call
Benchmark Russell 2000 (IWM) Russell 2000 (IWM)
Pays monthly weekly
Payout rate, annualized 11.7% 35.9%
Expense ratio 0.86% 1.73%
Cash paid, 1 year 12.5% 35.2%
Price change, 1 year +6.9% −19.8%
Total return, 1 year +20.3% +18.8%
Benchmark return, 1 year +19.0% +19.0%
Ahead or behind +1.3 pts −0.2 pts
Return of capital, latest estimate 93% 65%
Age 1.7 years 1.7 years
Net assets, as of Nov 3, 2026 $25m $15m

As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ. Cash paid: distributions over the window, as a share of the starting price. Payout rate: the latest payment, annualized, over today’s price.

Window by window

Window by window: FTKI vs RDTY: Dividend Yield & Total Return
Total returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
WindowFTKIRDTYFTKIRDTYFTKIRDTY
3 months+0.5%−1.5%2.9%7.7%+5.5 pts+3.5 pts
6 months+4.6%+5.1%5.9%16.5%+5.1 pts+5.6 pts
1 year+20.3%+18.8%12.5%35.2%+1.3 pts−0.2 pts
Since launchNot the same days: FTKI Feb 2025 · RDTY Mar 2025+19.9%+32.2%18.3%53.1%−16.2 pts−8.7 pts

Open this comparison in the app →

Client brief:

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

FTKI and RDTY flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
FTKI

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, FTKI paid 12.5% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 6.9%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +20.3%. Russell 2000 (IWM) returned +19.0% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 1.3 pts. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 11.7%, paid monthly. First Trust estimates that 93% of the distribution paid Oct 30, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice). That is a tax label, not a measure of erosion.

RDTY

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, RDTY paid 35.2% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 19.8%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +18.8%. Russell 2000 (IWM) returned +19.0% over the same days, so a holder was about even. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 35.9%, paid weekly. YieldMax estimates that 65% of the distribution paid Nov 5, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice).

Questions people ask

Which paid more, FTKI or RDTY?
Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, FTKI paid 12.5% of its starting price in cash and RDTY paid 35.2%, so RDTY paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, FTKI or RDTY?
With every distribution reinvested, FTKI returned +20.3% and RDTY +18.8% over the year to Nov 4, 2026.
Which is cheaper, FTKI or RDTY?
FTKI charges 0.86% a year and RDTY charges 1.73%, so FTKI is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Sources and dates

Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

It is a place in a set, not a rating or a recommendation.

Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.

Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, FTKI against RDTY, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/ftki-vs-rdty

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.