Data as of .
FEPI vs XYLG: which paid, and which earned it?
Over the year FEPI paid 23.4% of its price in cash against XYLG’s 13.2%, though XYLG returned more with it reinvested.
ETFIQ Return Stability Score: XYLG scores higher
Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?
A percentile among the 173 income ETFs writing on an index or proxy. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, FEPI and XYLG hold 18% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | FEPI | XYLG |
|---|---|---|
| APPLE INC. | 5.14% | 7.50% |
| AMAZON.COM, INC. | 5.21% | 3.81% |
| BROADCOM INC. | 8.05% | 2.59% |
| META PLATFORMS, INC. | 5.14% | 2.24% |
| MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC. | 8.91% | 1.75% |
| TESLA, INC. | 7.47% | 1.57% |
| NETFLIX, INC. | 5.16% | 0.46% |
| Only in FEPI | Only in XYLG |
|---|---|
| ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC. 9.98% | NVIDIA CORP 8.20% |
| ALPHABET INC. 8.83% | MICROSOFT CORP 5.59% |
| NVIDIA CORPORATION 7.76% | ALPHABET INC-CL A 3.12% |
| INTEL CORPORATION 5.24% | ALPHABET INC-CL C 2.48% |
| MICROSOFT CORPORATION 5.19% | BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC-CL B 1.45% |
| PALANTIR TECHNOLOGIES INC. 5.17% | JPMORGAN CHASE & CO 1.42% |
| APPLOVIN CORPORATION 5.16% | ELI LILLY & CO 1.41% |
| ORACLE CORPORATION 5.16% | ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES 1.40% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Sep 18, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FEPI | XYLG | FEPI | XYLG | FEPI | XYLG | |
| 3 months | +2.9% | +3.6% | 6.0% | 1.3% | +5.4 pts | +1.3 pts |
| 6 months | +17.2% | +15.7% | 12.8% | 3.0% | −7.1 pts | −2.3 pts |
| 1 year | +15.7% | +17.2% | 23.4% | 13.2% | −6.1 pts | +0.7 pts |
| 3 years | not published | +60.9% | not published | 43.0% | not published | −17.5 pts |
| Since launch | +69.0% | +114.0% | 66.8% | 69.0% | −28.5 pts | −38.7 pts |
| FEPI REX FANG & Innovation Equity Premium Income ETF Covered call on QQQ, paying weekly | XYLG Global X S&P 500 Covered Call & Growth ETF Covered call on SPY, paying monthly | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | REX | Global X |
| Strategy | covered call | covered call |
| Benchmark | Nasdaq-100 (QQQ), used as the innovation proxy | S&P 500 (SPY) |
| Pays | weekly | monthly |
| Payout rate, annualized | 24.9% | 4.4% |
| Expense ratio | 0.65% | 0.35% |
| Cash paid, 1 year | 23.4% | 13.2% |
| Price change, 1 year | −10.0% | +2.6% |
| Total return, 1 year | +15.7% | +17.2% |
| Benchmark return, 1 year | +21.8% | +16.6% |
| Ahead or behind | −6.1 pts | +0.7 pts |
| Return of capital, latest estimate | not published | 80% |
| Age | 1073 days | 2188 days |
| Net assets | $713m | $65m |
FEPI in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, FEPI paid 23.4% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 10.0%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +15.7%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ), used as the innovation proxy returned +21.8% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 6.1 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 24.9%, paid weekly.
XYLG in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, XYLG paid 13.2% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 2.6%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +17.2%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +16.6% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 0.7 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 4.4%, paid monthly. Global X estimates that 80% of the distribution paid Aug 27, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).
Questions people ask
- Which paid more, FEPI or XYLG?
- Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, FEPI paid 23.4% of its starting price in cash and XYLG paid 13.2%, so FEPI paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
- Which returned more once distributions are counted, FEPI or XYLG?
- With every distribution reinvested, FEPI returned +15.7% and XYLG returned +17.2% over the year to Sep 18, 2026, so XYLG returned more.
- Which is cheaper, FEPI or XYLG?
- FEPI charges 0.65% a year and XYLG charges 0.35%, so XYLG is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, FEPI against XYLG, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/fepi-vs-xylg Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.