Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

EGGY vs MAGY: which paid, and which earned it?

Over the year EGGY paid 28.1% of its price in cash against MAGY’s 26.5%, and returned more with it reinvested.

NestYield Dynamic Income ETF and Roundhill Magnificent Seven Covered Call ETF.

28.1%EGGY cash paid, 1 year
26.5%MAGY cash paid, 1 year
+15.3%EGGY total return, 1 year
+1.8%MAGY total return, 1 year

ETFIQ Return Stability Score: EGGY scores higher

Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?

EGGY 38.4MAGY 22.63.8, the lowest in this set96.8, the highest

A percentile among the 173 income ETFs writing on an index or proxy. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed

EGGY1.2 pts behind SPY · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
SPY+16.6%EGGY+15.3%28.1% of it arrived as cash1.2 pts behind SPYTotal return, distributions reinvestedSPY+16.6%EGGY+15.3%28.1% as cash1.2 pts behind SPY
MAGY9.4 pts behind MAGS · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
MAGS+11.2%MAGY+1.8%9.4 pts behind MAGSTotal return, distributions reinvestedMAGS+11.2%MAGY+1.8%9.4 pts behind MAGS

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, EGGY and MAGY hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Only in each
Only in EGGYOnly in MAGY
Seagate Technology Holdings PL 12.31%Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF 100.02%
Bloom Energy Corp 10.77%First American Government Obligations Fu 0.36%
Micron Technology Inc 7.95%MAGS 09/25/2026 71.37 C -0.38%
Lumentum Holdings Inc 6.86%
Astera Labs Inc 6.85%
Coherent Corp 5.81%
Vertiv Holdings Co 5.60%
Advanced Micro Devices Inc 4.86%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Sep 18, 2026.

Performance, window by window

EGGY and MAGY over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
EGGYMAGYEGGYMAGYEGGYMAGY
3 months−15.1%+3.7%7.1%6.1%−17.3 pts−3.9 pts
6 months+27.6%+8.1%19.4%12.9%+9.6 pts−12.7 pts
1 year+15.3%+1.8%28.1%26.5%−1.2 pts−9.4 pts
Since launch+42.3%+25.6%45.5%42.0%+11.8 pts−37.5 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
EGGY and MAGY on the same fields, as of Sep 18, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
EGGY
NestYield Dynamic Income ETF
Option income on SPY, paying monthly
MAGY
Roundhill Magnificent Seven Covered Call ETF
Covered call on MAGS, paying weekly
IssuerNest EggRoundhill
Strategyoption incomecovered call
BenchmarkS&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxyMagnificent Seven (MAGS)
Paysmonthlyweekly
Payout rate, annualized34.8%19.2%
Expense ratio0.92%0.99%
Cash paid, 1 year28.1%26.5%
Price change, 1 year−16.2%−25.3%
Total return, 1 year+15.3%+1.8%
Benchmark return, 1 year+16.6%+11.2%
Ahead or behind−1.2 pts−9.4 pts
Return of capital, latest estimatenot publishednot published
Age630 days513 days
Net assets$126m$102m

EGGY in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, EGGY paid 28.1% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 16.2%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +15.3%. S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy returned +16.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 1.2 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 34.8%, paid monthly.

MAGY in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, MAGY paid 26.5% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 25.3%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +1.8%. Magnificent Seven (MAGS) returned +11.2% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 9.4 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 19.2%, paid weekly.

Questions people ask

Which paid more, EGGY or MAGY?
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, EGGY paid 28.1% of its starting price in cash and MAGY paid 26.5%, so EGGY paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, EGGY or MAGY?
With every distribution reinvested, EGGY returned +15.3% and MAGY returned +1.8% over the year to Sep 18, 2026, so EGGY returned more.
Which is cheaper, EGGY or MAGY?
EGGY charges 0.92% a year and MAGY charges 0.99%, so EGGY is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

EGGY against MAGY, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, EGGY against MAGY, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/eggy-vs-magy Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources