Data as of .
CDPI vs XQQI: which paid, and which earned it?
CDPI and XQQI both write options for income.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CDPI | XQQI | CDPI | XQQI | CDPI | XQQI | |
| 3 months | not published | −2.7% | not published | 4.8% | not published | −0.2 pts |
| 6 months | not published | +21.8% | not published | 11.4% | not published | −2.4 pts |
| Since launch | +0.5% | +14.3% | 0.7% | 13.7% | −4.1 pts | −2.9 pts |
| CDPI Columbia High Dividend Premium Income ETF Covered call on SCHD | XQQI NEOS Boosted Nasdaq-100(R) High Income ETF Option income on QQQ, paying monthly | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | Columbia | NEOS |
| Strategy | covered call | option income |
| Benchmark | US dividend stocks (SCHD), used as the dividend proxy | Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) |
| Pays | not established | monthly |
| Payout rate, annualized | 8.2% | 20.5% |
| Expense ratio | 0.45% | 0.98% |
| Cash paid, 1 year | 0.7% (since launch on Jul 14, 2026) | 13.7% (since launch on Feb 3, 2026) |
| Price change, 1 year | −0.2% | −0.3% |
| Total return, 1 year | +0.5% (since launch on Jul 14, 2026) | +14.3% (since launch on Feb 3, 2026) |
| Benchmark return, 1 year | +4.6% | +17.3% |
| Ahead or behind | −4.1 pts | −2.9 pts |
| Return of capital, latest estimate | not published | 100% |
| Age | 66 days | 227 days |
| Net assets | not published | $351m |
CDPI in plain words
Over the period since launch on Jul 14, 2026 to Sep 18, 2026, CDPI paid 0.7% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 0.2%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +0.5%. US dividend stocks (SCHD), used as the dividend proxy returned +4.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 4.1 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 8.2%, paid periodically.
XQQI in plain words
Over the period since launch on Feb 3, 2026 to Sep 18, 2026, XQQI paid 13.7% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 0.3%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +14.3%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) returned +17.3% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 2.9 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 20.5%, paid monthly. NEOS estimates that 100% of the distribution paid Jul 10, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).
Questions people ask
- Which is cheaper, CDPI or XQQI?
- CDPI charges 0.45% a year and XQQI charges 0.98%, so CDPI is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, CDPI against XQQI, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/cdpi-vs-xqqi Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.