Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

CDPI vs KIQQ: which paid, and which earned it?

CDPI and KIQQ both write options for income.

Columbia High Dividend Premium Income ETF and KraneShares InspereX Nasdaq Dynamic Buffered High Income Index ETF.

0.7%CDPI cash paid, 1 year
5.8%KIQQ cash paid, 1 year
+0.5%CDPI total return, 1 year
+6.0%KIQQ total return, 1 year
CDPI4.1 pts behind SCHD · since launch to Sep 18, 2026
SCHD+4.6%CDPI+0.5%4.1 pts behind SCHDTotal return, distributions reinvestedSCHD+4.6%CDPI+0.5%4.1 pts behind SCHD
KIQQ9.9 pts behind QQQ · since launch to Sep 18, 2026
QQQ+15.9%KIQQ+6.0%5.8% of it arrived as cash9.9 pts behind QQQTotal return, distributions reinvestedQQQ+15.9%KIQQ+6.0%9.9 pts behind QQQ

Performance, window by window

CDPI and KIQQ over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
CDPIKIQQCDPIKIQQCDPIKIQQ
3 monthsnot published−3.2%not published1.9%not published−0.7 pts
6 monthsnot published+11.9%not published4.5%not published−12.3 pts
Since launch+0.5%+6.0%0.7%5.8%−4.1 pts−9.9 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
CDPI and KIQQ on the same fields, as of Sep 18, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
CDPI
Columbia High Dividend Premium Income ETF
Covered call on SCHD
KIQQ
KraneShares InspereX Nasdaq Dynamic Buffered High Income Index ETF
Buffer with income on QQQ, paying monthly
IssuerColumbiaKraneShares
Strategycovered callbuffer with income
BenchmarkUS dividend stocks (SCHD), used as the dividend proxyNasdaq-100 (QQQ)
Paysnot establishedmonthly
Payout rate, annualized8.2%6.3%
Expense ratio0.45%0.79%
Cash paid, 1 year0.7% (since launch on Jul 14, 2026)5.8% (since launch on Jan 7, 2026)
Price change, 1 year−0.2%−0.1%
Total return, 1 year+0.5% (since launch on Jul 14, 2026)+6.0% (since launch on Jan 7, 2026)
Benchmark return, 1 year+4.6%+15.9%
Ahead or behind−4.1 pts−9.9 pts
Return of capital, latest estimatenot publishednot published
Age66 days254 days
Net assetsnot published$3m

CDPI in plain words

Over the period since launch on Jul 14, 2026 to Sep 18, 2026, CDPI paid 0.7% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 0.2%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +0.5%. US dividend stocks (SCHD), used as the dividend proxy returned +4.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 4.1 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 8.2%, paid periodically.

KIQQ in plain words

Over the period since launch on Jan 7, 2026 to Sep 18, 2026, KIQQ paid 5.8% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 0.1%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +6.0%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) returned +15.9% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 9.9 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 6.3%, paid monthly.

Questions people ask

Which is cheaper, CDPI or KIQQ?
CDPI charges 0.45% a year and KIQQ charges 0.79%, so CDPI is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

CDPI against KIQQ, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, CDPI against KIQQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/cdpi-vs-kiqq Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources