Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

CDPI vs DDDD: which paid, and which earned it?

CDPI and DDDD both write options for income.

Columbia High Dividend Premium Income ETF and YieldMax(R) U.S. Stocks Target Double Distribution ETF.

0.7%CDPI cash paid, 1 year
1.6%DDDD cash paid, 1 year
+0.5%CDPI total return, 1 year
+8.7%DDDD total return, 1 year
CDPI4.1 pts behind SCHD · since launch to Sep 18, 2026
SCHD+4.6%CDPI+0.5%4.1 pts behind SCHDTotal return, distributions reinvestedSCHD+4.6%CDPI+0.5%4.1 pts behind SCHD
DDDD6.5 pts behind SPY · since launch to Sep 18, 2026
SPY+15.3%DDDD+8.7%6.5 pts behind SPYTotal return, distributions reinvestedSPY+15.3%DDDD+8.7%6.5 pts behind SPY

Performance, window by window

CDPI and DDDD over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
CDPIDDDDCDPIDDDDCDPIDDDD
3 monthsnot published+4.9%not published1.6%not published+2.6 pts
6 monthsnot published+10.5%not published1.7%not published−7.6 pts
Since launch+0.5%+8.7%0.7%1.6%−4.1 pts−6.5 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
CDPI and DDDD on the same fields, as of Sep 18, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
CDPI
Columbia High Dividend Premium Income ETF
Covered call on SCHD
DDDD
YieldMax(R) U.S. Stocks Target Double Distribution ETF
Synthetic covered call on SPY
IssuerColumbiaYieldMax
Strategycovered callsynthetic covered call
BenchmarkUS dividend stocks (SCHD), used as the dividend proxyS&P 500 (SPY)
Paysnot establishednot established
Payout rate, annualized8.2%18.4%
Expense ratio0.45%1.01%
Cash paid, 1 year0.7% (since launch on Jul 14, 2026)1.6% (since launch on Mar 12, 2026)
Price change, 1 year−0.2%+7.0%
Total return, 1 year+0.5% (since launch on Jul 14, 2026)+8.7% (since launch on Mar 12, 2026)
Benchmark return, 1 year+4.6%+15.3%
Ahead or behind−4.1 pts−6.5 pts
Return of capital, latest estimatenot published67%
Age66 days190 days
Net assetsnot published$7m

CDPI in plain words

Over the period since launch on Jul 14, 2026 to Sep 18, 2026, CDPI paid 0.7% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 0.2%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +0.5%. US dividend stocks (SCHD), used as the dividend proxy returned +4.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 4.1 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 8.2%, paid periodically.

DDDD in plain words

Over the period since launch on Mar 12, 2026 to Sep 18, 2026, DDDD paid 1.6% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 7.0%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +8.7%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +15.3% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 6.5 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 18.4%, paid periodically. YieldMax estimates that 67% of the distribution paid Jul 6, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).

Questions people ask

Which is cheaper, CDPI or DDDD?
CDPI charges 0.45% a year and DDDD charges 1.01%, so CDPI is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

CDPI against DDDD, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, CDPI against DDDD, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/cdpi-vs-dddd Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources