Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

CAIQ vs CDPI: which paid, and which earned it?

CAIQ and CDPI both write options for income.

Calamos Nasdaq Autocallable Income ETF and Columbia High Dividend Premium Income ETF.

13.7%CAIQ cash paid, 1 year
0.7%CDPI cash paid, 1 year
+16.7%CAIQ total return, 1 year
+0.5%CDPI total return, 1 year
CAIQ7 pts behind QQQ · since launch to Sep 18, 2026
QQQ+23.6%CAIQ+16.7%13.7% of it arrived as cash7 pts behind QQQTotal return, distributions reinvestedQQQ+23.6%CAIQ+16.7%13.7% cash7 pts behind QQQ
CDPI4.1 pts behind SCHD · since launch to Sep 18, 2026
SCHD+4.6%CDPI+0.5%4.1 pts behind SCHDTotal return, distributions reinvestedSCHD+4.6%CDPI+0.5%4.1 pts behind SCHD

Performance, window by window

CAIQ and CDPI over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
CAIQCDPICAIQCDPICAIQCDPI
3 months−0.5%not published4.3%not published+1.9 ptsnot published
6 months+16.5%not published9.5%not published−7.7 ptsnot published
Since launch+16.7%+0.5%13.7%0.7%−7.0 pts−4.1 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
CAIQ and CDPI on the same fields, as of Sep 18, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
CAIQ
Calamos Nasdaq Autocallable Income ETF
Option income on QQQ, paying monthly
CDPI
Columbia High Dividend Premium Income ETF
Covered call on SCHD
IssuerCalamosColumbia
Strategyoption incomecovered call
BenchmarkNasdaq-100 (QQQ)US dividend stocks (SCHD), used as the dividend proxy
Paysmonthlynot established
Payout rate, annualized17.9%8.2%
Expense ratio0.74%0.45%
Cash paid, 1 year13.7% (since launch on Nov 20, 2025)0.7% (since launch on Jul 14, 2026)
Price change, 1 year+2.1%−0.2%
Total return, 1 year+16.7% (since launch on Nov 20, 2025)+0.5% (since launch on Jul 14, 2026)
Benchmark return, 1 year+23.6%+4.6%
Ahead or behind−7.0 pts−4.1 pts
Return of capital, latest estimatenot publishednot published
Age302 days66 days
Net assets$167mnot published

CAIQ in plain words

Over the period since launch on Nov 20, 2025 to Sep 18, 2026, CAIQ paid 13.7% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 2.1%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +16.7%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) returned +23.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 7.0 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 17.9%, paid monthly.

CDPI in plain words

Over the period since launch on Jul 14, 2026 to Sep 18, 2026, CDPI paid 0.7% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 0.2%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +0.5%. US dividend stocks (SCHD), used as the dividend proxy returned +4.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 4.1 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 8.2%, paid periodically.

Questions people ask

Which is cheaper, CAIQ or CDPI?
CAIQ charges 0.74% a year and CDPI charges 0.45%, so CDPI is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

CAIQ against CDPI, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, CAIQ against CDPI, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/caiq-vs-cdpi Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources