Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

BAGY vs BPI: which paid, and which earned it?

BAGY and BPI both write options for income.

Amplify Bitcoin Max Income Covered Call ETF and Grayscale Bitcoin Premium Income ETF.

20.3%BAGY cash paid, 1 year
5.4%BPI cash paid, 1 year
−40.2%BAGY total return, 1 year
+5.4%BPI total return, 1 year
BAGY9.2 pts behind IBIT · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
IBIT−31.1%BAGY−40.2%9.2 pts behind IBITTotal return, distributions reinvestedIBIT−31.1%BAGY−40.2%9.2 pts behind IBIT
BPI0.8 pts behind IBIT · since launch to Sep 18, 2026
IBIT+6.2%BPI+5.4%0.8 pts behind IBITTotal return, distributions reinvestedIBIT+6.2%BPI+5.4%0.8 pts behind IBIT

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, BAGY and BPI hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Only in each
Only in BAGYOnly in BPI
Invesco Government & Agency Portfolio 12 45.60%TREASURY BILL 100.00%
Cash & Other 23.34%
United States Treasury Bill 11/05/2026 18.11%
MBTX 12/18/2026 169.25 C 17.25%
United States Treasury Bill 09/29/2026 1.45%
MBTX 09/22/2026 188.42 C -2.58%
MBTX 12/18/2026 169.25 P -3.17%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Sep 21, 2026.

Performance, window by window

BAGY and BPI over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
BAGYBPIBAGYBPIBAGYBPI
3 months+11.0%+26.6%7.4%4.0%−18.2 pts−2.5 pts
6 months−2.5%not published14.9%not published−18.2 ptsnot published
1 year−40.2%not published20.3%not published−9.2 ptsnot published
Since launch−23.5%+5.4%34.9%5.4%−8.4 pts−0.8 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
BAGY and BPI on the same fields, as of Sep 18, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
BAGY
Amplify Bitcoin Max Income Covered Call ETF
Covered call on IBIT, paying monthly
BPI
Grayscale Bitcoin Premium Income ETF
Covered call on IBIT, paying monthly
IssuerAmplifyGrayscale
Strategycovered callcovered call
BenchmarkBitcoin (IBIT)Bitcoin (IBIT)
Paysmonthlymonthly
Payout rate, annualized29.9%6.3%
Expense ratio0.65%0.65%
Cash paid, 1 year20.3%5.4% (since launch on Apr 30, 2026)
Price change, 1 year−57.9%−0.8%
Total return, 1 year−40.2%+5.4% (since launch on Apr 30, 2026)
Benchmark return, 1 year−31.1%+6.2%
Ahead or behind−9.2 pts−0.8 pts
Return of capital, latest estimatenot publishednot published
Age507 days141 days
Net assets$11m$2m

BAGY in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, BAGY paid 20.3% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 57.9%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −40.2%. Bitcoin (IBIT) returned −31.1% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 9.2 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 29.9%, paid monthly.

BPI in plain words

Over the period since launch on Apr 30, 2026 to Sep 18, 2026, BPI paid 5.4% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 0.8%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +5.4%. Bitcoin (IBIT) returned +6.2% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 0.8 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 6.3%, paid monthly.

Questions people ask

Which is cheaper, BAGY or BPI?
BAGY charges 0.65% a year and BPI charges 0.65%, so BAGY is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

BAGY against BPI, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, BAGY against BPI, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/bagy-vs-bpi Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources