Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

BPI vs BTCC: which paid, and which earned it?

BPI and BTCC both write options for income.

Grayscale Bitcoin Premium Income ETF and Grayscale Bitcoin Covered Call ETF.

5.4%BPI cash paid, 1 year
29.0%BTCC cash paid, 1 year
+5.4%BPI total return, 1 year
−32.5%BTCC total return, 1 year
BPI0.8 pts behind IBIT · since launch to Sep 18, 2026
IBIT+6.2%BPI+5.4%5.4% cash0.8 pts behind IBITTotal return, distributions reinvestedIBIT+6.2%BPI+5.4%0.8 pts behind IBIT
BTCC1.4 pts behind IBIT · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
IBIT−31.1%BTCC−32.5%1.4 pts behind IBITTotal return, distributions reinvestedIBIT−31.1%BTCC−32.5%1.4 pts behind IBIT

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, BPI and BTCC hold 100% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions BPI and BTCC both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingBPIBTCC
TREASURY BILL100.00%100.00%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.

Performance, window by window

BPI and BTCC over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
BPIBTCCBPIBTCCBPIBTCC
3 months+26.6%+12.8%4.0%10.4%−2.5 pts−16.4 pts
6 monthsnot published+4.3%not published20.2%not published−11.4 pts
1 yearnot published−32.5%not published29.0%not published−1.4 pts
Since launch+5.4%−17.7%5.4%53.5%−0.8 pts−10.8 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
BPI and BTCC on the same fields, as of Sep 18, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
BPI
Grayscale Bitcoin Premium Income ETF
Covered call on IBIT, paying monthly
BTCC
Grayscale Bitcoin Covered Call ETF
Covered call on IBIT, paying monthly
IssuerGrayscaleGrayscale
Strategycovered callcovered call
BenchmarkBitcoin (IBIT)Bitcoin (IBIT)
Paysmonthlymonthly
Payout rate, annualized6.3%20.2%
Expense ratio0.65%0.65%
Cash paid, 1 year5.4% (since launch on Apr 30, 2026)29.0%
Price change, 1 year−0.8%−59.1%
Total return, 1 year+5.4% (since launch on Apr 30, 2026)−32.5%
Benchmark return, 1 year+6.2%−31.1%
Ahead or behind−0.8 pts−1.4 pts
Return of capital, latest estimatenot publishednot published
Age141 days534 days
Net assets$3m$13m

BPI in plain words

Over the period since launch on Apr 30, 2026 to Sep 18, 2026, BPI paid 5.4% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 0.8%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +5.4%. Bitcoin (IBIT) returned +6.2% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 0.8 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 6.3%, paid monthly.

BTCC in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, BTCC paid 29.0% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 59.1%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −32.5%. Bitcoin (IBIT) returned −31.1% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 1.4 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 20.2%, paid monthly.

Questions people ask

Which is cheaper, BPI or BTCC?
BPI charges 0.65% a year and BTCC charges 0.65%, so BPI is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

BPI against BTCC, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, BPI against BTCC, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/bpi-vs-btcc Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources