Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

APRJ vs QDTY: which paid, and which earned it?

Over the year QDTY paid 30.9% of its price in cash against APRJ’s 5.7%, and returned more with it reinvested.

Innovator Premium Income 30 Barrier ETF - April and YieldMax(R) Nasdaq 100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF.

5.7%APRJ cash paid, 1 year
30.9%QDTY cash paid, 1 year
+6.0%APRJ total return, 1 year
+20.2%QDTY total return, 1 year

ETFIQ Return Stability Score: APRJ scores higher

Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?

APRJ 44.2QDTY 373.8, the lowest in this set96.8, the highest

A percentile among the 173 income ETFs writing on an index or proxy. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed

APRJ10.5 pts behind SPY · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
SPY+16.6%APRJ+6.0%5.7% as cash10.5 pts behind SPYTotal return, distributions reinvestedSPY+16.6%APRJ+6.0%10.5 pts behind SPY
QDTY1.6 pts behind QQQ · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
QQQ+21.8%QDTY+20.2%30.9% of it arrived as cash1.6 pts behind QQQTotal return, distributions reinvestedQQQ+21.8%QDTY+20.2%30.9% as cash1.6 pts behind QQQ

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, APRJ and QDTY hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Only in each
Only in APRJOnly in QDTY
TREASURY BILL 95.06%NDX 12/18/2026 1001.26 C 96.19%
TREASURY BILL 1.66%XND 12/18/2026 10.02 C 3.21%
TREASURY BILL 1.65%First American Government Obligations Fund 12/01/2031 0.53%
TREASURY BILL 1.64%United States Treasury Bill 10/15/2026 0.07%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Sep 21, 2026.

Performance, window by window

APRJ and QDTY over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
APRJQDTYAPRJQDTYAPRJQDTY
3 months+1.3%−0.9%1.7%7.9%−1.0 pts+1.6 pts
6 months+3.8%+20.7%3.0%17.3%−14.2 pts−3.6 pts
1 year+6.0%+20.2%5.7%30.9%−10.5 pts−1.6 pts
3 years+19.3%not published17.4%not published−59.1 ptsnot published
Since launch+23.7%+27.1%19.4%42.0%−69.9 pts−8.5 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
APRJ and QDTY on the same fields, as of Sep 18, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
APRJ
Innovator Premium Income 30 Barrier ETF - April
Defined income on SPY, paying quarterly
QDTY
YieldMax(R) Nasdaq 100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF
0DTE covered call on QQQ, paying weekly
IssuerInnovatorYieldMax
Strategydefined income0DTE covered call
BenchmarkS&P 500 (SPY)Nasdaq-100 (QQQ)
Paysquarterlyweekly
Payout rate, annualized6.8%25.9%
Expense ratio0.79%1.17%
Cash paid, 1 year5.7%30.9%
Price change, 1 year+0.1%−14.0%
Total return, 1 year+6.0%+20.2%
Benchmark return, 1 year+16.6%+21.8%
Ahead or behind−10.5 pts−1.6 pts
Return of capital, latest estimatenot published94%
Age1264 days582 days
Net assets$31m$27m

APRJ in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, APRJ paid 5.7% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 0.1%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +6.0%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +16.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 10.5 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 6.8%, paid quarterly.

QDTY in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, QDTY paid 30.9% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 14.0%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +20.2%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) returned +21.8% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 1.6 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 25.9%, paid weekly. YieldMax estimates that 94% of the distribution paid Sep 17, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).

Questions people ask

Which paid more, APRJ or QDTY?
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, APRJ paid 5.7% of its starting price in cash and QDTY paid 30.9%, so QDTY paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, APRJ or QDTY?
With every distribution reinvested, APRJ returned +6.0% and QDTY returned +20.2% over the year to Sep 18, 2026, so QDTY returned more.
Which is cheaper, APRJ or QDTY?
APRJ charges 0.79% a year and QDTY charges 1.17%, so APRJ is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

APRJ against QDTY, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, APRJ against QDTY, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/aprj-vs-qdty Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources