Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

ACSP vs SCEP: which paid, and which earned it?

ACSP and SCEP both write options for income.

ProShares S&P 500 Autocallable Income ETF and STERLING CAPITAL HEDGED EQUITY PREMIUM INCOME ETF.

0.0%ACSP cash paid, 1 year
5.0%SCEP cash paid, 1 year
−3.8%ACSP total return, 1 year
+3.5%SCEP total return, 1 year
ACSP2.1 pts behind SPY · since launch to Sep 18, 2026
SPY−1.6%ACSP−3.8%2.1 pts behind SPYTotal return, distributions reinvestedSPY−1.6%ACSP−3.8%2.1 pts behind SPY
SCEP8.2 pts behind SPY · since launch to Sep 18, 2026
SPY+11.7%SCEP+3.5%5.0% as cash8.2 pts behind SPYTotal return, distributions reinvestedSPY+11.7%SCEP+3.5%8.2 pts behind SPY

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, ACSP and SCEP hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Only in each
Only in ACSPOnly in SCEP
S&P500 FUTURES 35% AUTOCALL SWAP BANK OF AMERICA NA 100.00%ALPHABET INC 5.98%
APPLE INC 5.71%
NVIDIA CORP 5.70%
BROADCOM INC 5.61%
AMAZON.COM INC 4.68%
JP MORGAN CHASE & COMPANY 3.55%
MICROSOFT CORP 3.49%
LAM RESEARCH CORP 2.64%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Sep 18, 2026.

Performance, window by window

ACSP and SCEP over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
ACSPSCEPACSPSCEPACSPSCEP
3 monthsnot published−0.1%not published1.7%not published−2.4 pts
6 monthsnot published+8.3%not published3.7%not published−9.7 pts
Since launch−3.8%+3.5%0.0%5.0%−2.1 pts−8.2 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
ACSP and SCEP on the same fields, as of Sep 18, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
ACSP
ProShares S&P 500 Autocallable Income ETF
Option income on SPY
SCEP
STERLING CAPITAL HEDGED EQUITY PREMIUM INCOME ETF
Covered call on SPY, paying monthly
IssuerProSharesSterling Capital
Strategyoption incomecovered call
BenchmarkS&P 500 (SPY)S&P 500 (SPY)
Paysnot establishedmonthly
Payout rate, annualizednot published7.1%
Expense ratio0.72%0.65%
Cash paid, 1 year0.0% (since launch on Aug 14, 2026)5.0% (since launch on Dec 11, 2025)
Price change, 1 year−3.8%−1.6%
Total return, 1 year−3.8% (since launch on Aug 14, 2026)+3.5% (since launch on Dec 11, 2025)
Benchmark return, 1 year−1.6%+11.7%
Ahead or behind−2.1 pts−8.2 pts
Return of capital, latest estimatenot publishednot published
Age35 days281 days
Net assets$27m$235m

ACSP in plain words

Over the period since launch on Aug 14, 2026 to Sep 18, 2026, ACSP paid 0.0% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 3.8%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −3.8%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned −1.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 2.1 pts.

SCEP in plain words

Over the period since launch on Dec 11, 2025 to Sep 18, 2026, SCEP paid 5.0% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 1.6%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +3.5%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +11.7% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 8.2 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 7.1%, paid monthly.

Questions people ask

Which is cheaper, ACSP or SCEP?
ACSP charges 0.72% a year and SCEP charges 0.65%, so SCEP is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

ACSP against SCEP, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, ACSP against SCEP, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acsp-vs-scep Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources