Data as of Nov 4, 2026.

vsOpen in the appCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Income ETFs

ACSP vs GRNI: Dividend Yield & Total Return

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

ACSP and GRNI both write options for income.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about ACSP and GRNI

Net assets: $57m on Nov 4, 2026 for ProShares S&P 500 Autocallable Income ETF, and $55m on Jul 31, 2026 for Fundstrat Granny Shots US Large Cap & Income ETF.

At a glance
10.4%
ACSP cash paid, since launch, Aug 14, 2026
9.5%
GRNI cash paid, since launch, Nov 18, 2025
−6.8%
ACSP total return, since launch, Aug 14, 2026
+9.0%
GRNI total return, since launch, Nov 18, 2025
ACSP · since launch to Nov 4, 2026 5.8 pts behind SPY
ACSP
−6.8%
SPY
−1.0%

5.8 pts behind SPY

ACSP since launch: paid 10.4%, price −16.9%, total −6.8%, SPY −1.0%, −5.8 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

SPY

−1.0%

ACSP

−6.8%

5.8 pts behind SPY

Total return, distributions reinvested

5.8 pts behind SPY

ACSP since launch: paid 10.4%, price −16.9%, total −6.8%, SPY −1.0%, −5.8 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

SPY

−1.0%

ACSP

−6.8%

5.8 pts behind SPY

10.4% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. ACSP since launch: paid 10.4%, price −16.9%, total −6.8%, SPY −1.0%, −5.8 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

Data to Nov 4, 2026.
GRNI · since launch to Nov 4, 2026 Not measured
GRNI
+9.0%
none

Not measured

GRNI since launch: paid 9.5%, price −0.6%, total +9.0%, not measured against a benchmark. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

GRNI

+9.0%

9.5% of it arrived as cash

Total return, distributions reinvested

Not measured

GRNI since launch: paid 9.5%, price −0.6%, total +9.0%, not measured against a benchmark. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

GRNI

+9.0%

9.5% cash

9.5% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, with zero at the line. GRNI since launch: paid 9.5%, price −0.6%, total +9.0%, not measured against a benchmark. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

Data to Nov 4, 2026.

Pair scorecard

ACSP costs 0.27 points a year less.

Points (pts) are percentage points.

ACSP vs GRNI: Dividend Yield & Total Return
MeasureACSPGRNI
Paid and earned
Price changefell 16.9% (since Aug 14, 2026)fell 6.4% (6 months)
Against its benchmark
BenchmarkS&P 500, measured through SPYits own stocks
Against its benchmark, same daysbehind by 5.8 ptsbehind by 0.8 pts
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.72%0.99%
Net assets, ACSP as of Nov 4, 2026 and GRNI as of Jul 31, 2026$57m$55m
Holdings
Holdings in common0%

Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, ACSP and GRNI hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Nov 3, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first ACSP GRNI
Only in one fund ↓
Only in ACSP
S&P500 FUTURES 35% AUTOCALL SWAP BANK OF AMERICA NA 100.01%
Only in GRNI
Arista Networks Inc 2.98%
General Electric Co 2.79%
JPMorgan Chase & Co 2.69%
Packaging Corp of America 2.69%
PNC Financial Services Group I 2.67%
Robinhood Markets Inc 2.65%
Bank of New York Mellon Corp 2.63%
Eli Lilly & Co 2.61%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

ACSP ProShares S&P 500 Autocallable Income ETF · Autocallable on SPY GRNI Fundstrat Granny Shots US Large Cap & Income ETF · Option income on its own stocks, paying monthly
Strategy autocallable option income
Benchmark S&P 500 (SPY) GRNI's own stocks, without the options (from its filed holdings, rebalanced at each filing; latest Jul 31, 2026)
Pays not established monthly
Payout rate, annualized 17.5% 10.5%
Expense ratio 0.72% 0.99%
Cash paid, 1 year 10.4% (since launch, Aug 14, 2026) 9.5% (since launch, Nov 18, 2025)
Price change, 1 year −16.9% (since launch, Aug 14, 2026) −0.6% (since launch, Nov 18, 2025)
Total return, 1 year −6.8% (since launch, Aug 14, 2026) +9.0% (since launch, Nov 18, 2025)
Benchmark return, 1 year −1.0% (since launch, Aug 14, 2026) not published
Ahead or behind −5.8 pts (since launch, Aug 14, 2026) not available
Return of capital, latest estimate 98% not published
Age 82 days 351 days
Net assets, ACSP as of Nov 4, 2026 and GRNI as of Jul 31, 2026 $57m $55m

As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ. Cash paid: distributions over the window, as a share of the starting price. Payout rate: the latest payment, annualized, over today’s price.

Window by window

Window by window: ACSP vs GRNI: Dividend Yield & Total Return
Total returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
WindowACSPGRNIACSPGRNIACSPGRNI
3 months–−3.9%–2.5%–−0.6 pts
6 months–−1.6%–5.0%–−0.8 pts
Since launchNot the same days: ACSP Aug 2026 · GRNI Nov 2025−6.8%+9.0%10.4%9.5%−5.8 ptsnot measured

– means no data for this window. Open this comparison in the app →

Alert

ACSP flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
ACSP

Over the period from its first trade on Aug 14, 2026 to Nov 4, 2026, ACSP paid 10.4% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 16.9%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −6.8%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned −1.0% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 5.8 pts. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 17.5%, paid periodically. ProShares estimates that 98% of the distribution paid Nov 6, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice). That is a tax label, not a measure of erosion.

GRNI

GRNI's own stocks, without the options (from its filed holdings, rebalanced at each filing; latest Jul 31, 2026) returned −0.8% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 0.8 pts.

Over the 6 months to Nov 4, 2026, GRNI paid 5.0% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 6.4%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −1.6%. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 10.5%, paid monthly.

Questions people ask

Which is cheaper, ACSP or GRNI?
ACSP charges 0.72% a year and GRNI charges 0.99%, so ACSP is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, ACSP against GRNI, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acsp-vs-grni

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.