Data as of .
ACSP vs GRNI: which paid, and which earned it?
ACSP and GRNI both write options for income.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, ACSP and GRNI hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in ACSP | Only in GRNI |
|---|---|
| S&P500 FUTURES 35% AUTOCALL SWAP BANK OF AMERICA NA 100.00% | Advanced Micro Devices Inc 4.11% |
| Quanta Services Inc 3.23% | |
| GE Vernova Inc 3.08% | |
| Strategy Inc 3.04% | |
| Amazon.com Inc 2.99% | |
| Alphabet Inc 2.96% | |
| Broadcom Inc 2.90% | |
| Arista Networks Inc 2.86% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Sep 18, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ACSP | GRNI | ACSP | GRNI | ACSP | GRNI | |
| 3 months | not published | +2.1% | not published | 2.5% | not published | −0.2 pts |
| 6 months | not published | +16.3% | not published | 5.4% | not published | −1.8 pts |
| Since launch | −3.8% | +14.5% | 0.0% | 7.8% | −2.1 pts | −2.1 pts |
| ACSP ProShares S&P 500 Autocallable Income ETF Option income on SPY | GRNI Fundstrat Granny Shots US Large Cap & Income ETF Option income on SPY, paying monthly | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | ProShares | Fundstrat |
| Strategy | option income | option income |
| Benchmark | S&P 500 (SPY) | S&P 500 (SPY) |
| Pays | not established | monthly |
| Payout rate, annualized | not published | 10.0% |
| Expense ratio | 0.72% | 0.99% |
| Cash paid, 1 year | 0.0% (since launch on Aug 14, 2026) | 7.8% (since launch on Nov 18, 2025) |
| Price change, 1 year | −3.8% | +6.2% |
| Total return, 1 year | −3.8% (since launch on Aug 14, 2026) | +14.5% (since launch on Nov 18, 2025) |
| Benchmark return, 1 year | −1.6% | +16.6% |
| Ahead or behind | −2.1 pts | −2.1 pts |
| Return of capital, latest estimate | not published | not published |
| Age | 35 days | 304 days |
| Net assets | $27m | $49m |
ACSP in plain words
Over the period since launch on Aug 14, 2026 to Sep 18, 2026, ACSP paid 0.0% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 3.8%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −3.8%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned −1.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 2.1 pts.
GRNI in plain words
Over the period since launch on Nov 18, 2025 to Sep 18, 2026, GRNI paid 7.8% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 6.2%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +14.5%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +16.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 2.1 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 10.0%, paid monthly.
Questions people ask
- Which is cheaper, ACSP or GRNI?
- ACSP charges 0.72% a year and GRNI charges 0.99%, so ACSP is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, ACSP against GRNI, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acsp-vs-grni Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.