Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

ACSP vs CVRD: which paid, and which earned it?

ACSP and CVRD both write options for income.

ProShares S&P 500 Autocallable Income ETF and Madison Covered Call ETF.

0.0%ACSP cash paid, 1 year
7.4%CVRD cash paid, 1 year
−3.8%ACSP total return, 1 year
+5.6%CVRD total return, 1 year
ACSP2.1 pts behind SPY · since launch to Sep 18, 2026
SPY−1.6%ACSP−3.8%2.1 pts behind SPYTotal return, distributions reinvestedSPY−1.6%ACSP−3.8%2.1 pts behind SPY
CVRD11 pts behind SPY · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
SPY+16.6%CVRD+5.6%7.4% as cash11 pts behind SPYTotal return, distributions reinvestedSPY+16.6%CVRD+5.6%11 pts behind SPY

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, ACSP and CVRD hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Only in each
Only in ACSPOnly in CVRD
S&P500 FUTURES 35% AUTOCALL SWAP BANK OF AMERICA NA 100.00%Palo Alto Networks Inc 4.84%
Archer-Daniels-Midland Co 4.58%
Danaher Corp 4.32%
Amazon.com Inc 4.06%
Agilent Technologies Inc 3.98%
Microsoft Corp 3.88%
Visa Inc 3.68%
Broadcom Inc 3.57%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Sep 18, 2026.

Performance, window by window

ACSP and CVRD over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
ACSPCVRDACSPCVRDACSPCVRD
3 monthsnot published+4.0%not published1.7%not published+1.7 pts
6 monthsnot published+5.7%not published3.3%not published−12.3 pts
1 yearnot published+5.6%not published7.4%not published−11.0 pts
3 yearsnot published+19.5%not published25.9%not published−58.9 pts
Since launch−3.8%+21.1%0.0%26.3%−2.1 pts−59.8 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
ACSP and CVRD on the same fields, as of Sep 18, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
ACSP
ProShares S&P 500 Autocallable Income ETF
Option income on SPY
CVRD
Madison Covered Call ETF
Covered call on SPY, paying quarterly
IssuerProSharesMadison
Strategyoption incomecovered call
BenchmarkS&P 500 (SPY)S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy
Paysnot establishedquarterly
Payout rate, annualizednot published6.5%
Expense ratio0.72%0.92%
Cash paid, 1 year0.0% (since launch on Aug 14, 2026)7.4%
Price change, 1 year−3.8%−2.2%
Total return, 1 year−3.8% (since launch on Aug 14, 2026)+5.6%
Benchmark return, 1 year−1.6%+16.6%
Ahead or behind−2.1 pts−11.0 pts
Return of capital, latest estimatenot publishednot published
Age35 days1123 days
Net assets$27m$32m

ACSP in plain words

Over the period since launch on Aug 14, 2026 to Sep 18, 2026, ACSP paid 0.0% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 3.8%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −3.8%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned −1.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 2.1 pts.

CVRD in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, CVRD paid 7.4% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 2.2%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +5.6%. S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy returned +16.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 11.0 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 6.5%, paid quarterly.

Questions people ask

Which is cheaper, ACSP or CVRD?
ACSP charges 0.72% a year and CVRD charges 0.92%, so ACSP is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

ACSP against CVRD, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, ACSP against CVRD, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acsp-vs-cvrd Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources