Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

ACSP vs BALI: which paid, and which earned it?

ACSP and BALI both write options for income.

ProShares S&P 500 Autocallable Income ETF and iShares U.S. Large Cap Premium Income Active ETF.

0.0%ACSP cash paid, 1 year
8.5%BALI cash paid, 1 year
−3.8%ACSP total return, 1 year
+18.5%BALI total return, 1 year
ACSP2.1 pts behind SPY · since launch to Sep 18, 2026
SPY−1.6%ACSP−3.8%2.1 pts behind SPYTotal return, distributions reinvestedSPY−1.6%ACSP−3.8%2.1 pts behind SPY
BALI2 pts ahead of SPY · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
SPY+16.6%BALI+18.5%8.5% of it arrived as cash2 pts ahead of SPYTotal return, distributions reinvestedSPY+16.6%BALI+18.5%2 pts ahead of SPY

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, ACSP and BALI hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Only in each
Only in ACSPOnly in BALI
S&P500 FUTURES 35% AUTOCALL SWAP BANK OF AMERICA NA 100.00%NVIDIA 7.36%
APPLE 6.15%
MICROSOFT 5.07%
AMAZON.COM INC 3.29%
BLK CSH FND TREASURY SL AGENCY 2.91%
ALPHABET CLASS A 2.70%
ALPHABET CLASS C 2.38%
BROADCOM INC 2.25%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 18, 2026.

Performance, window by window

ACSP and BALI over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
ACSPBALIACSPBALIACSPBALI
3 monthsnot published+4.0%not published2.0%not published+1.8 pts
6 monthsnot published+17.3%not published4.7%not published−0.8 pts
1 yearnot published+18.5%not published8.5%not published+2.0 pts
Since launch−3.8%+76.3%0.0%29.2%−2.1 pts−8.0 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
ACSP and BALI on the same fields, as of Sep 18, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
ACSP
ProShares S&P 500 Autocallable Income ETF
Option income on SPY
BALI
iShares U.S. Large Cap Premium Income Active ETF
Covered call on SPY, paying monthly
IssuerProSharesiShares
Strategyoption incomecovered call
BenchmarkS&P 500 (SPY)S&P 500 (SPY)
Paysnot establishedmonthly
Payout rate, annualizednot published7.5%
Expense ratio0.72%0.35%
Cash paid, 1 year0.0% (since launch on Aug 14, 2026)8.5%
Price change, 1 year−3.8%+9.2%
Total return, 1 year−3.8% (since launch on Aug 14, 2026)+18.5%
Benchmark return, 1 year−1.6%+16.6%
Ahead or behind−2.1 pts+2.0 pts
Return of capital, latest estimatenot publishednot published
Age35 days1086 days
Net assets$27m$1.5bn

ACSP in plain words

Over the period since launch on Aug 14, 2026 to Sep 18, 2026, ACSP paid 0.0% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 3.8%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −3.8%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned −1.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 2.1 pts.

BALI in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, BALI paid 8.5% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 9.2%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +18.5%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +16.6% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 2.0 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 7.5%, paid monthly.

Questions people ask

Which is cheaper, ACSP or BALI?
ACSP charges 0.72% a year and BALI charges 0.35%, so BALI is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

ACSP against BALI, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, ACSP against BALI, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acsp-vs-bali Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources