Data as of .
ACQQ vs CDPI: which paid, and which earned it?
ACQQ and CDPI both write options for income.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ACQQ | CDPI | ACQQ | CDPI | ACQQ | CDPI | |
| Since launch | −2.1% | +0.5% | 0.0% | 0.7% | −0.8 pts | −4.1 pts |
| ACQQ ProShares Nasdaq-100 Autocallable Income ETF Option income on QQQ | CDPI Columbia High Dividend Premium Income ETF Covered call on SCHD | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | ProShares | Columbia |
| Strategy | option income | covered call |
| Benchmark | Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) | US dividend stocks (SCHD), used as the dividend proxy |
| Pays | not established | not established |
| Payout rate, annualized | not published | 8.2% |
| Expense ratio | 0.72% | 0.45% |
| Cash paid, 1 year | 0.0% (since launch on Aug 14, 2026) | 0.7% (since launch on Jul 14, 2026) |
| Price change, 1 year | −2.1% | −0.2% |
| Total return, 1 year | −2.1% (since launch on Aug 14, 2026) | +0.5% (since launch on Jul 14, 2026) |
| Benchmark return, 1 year | −1.3% | +4.6% |
| Ahead or behind | −0.8 pts | −4.1 pts |
| Return of capital, latest estimate | not published | not published |
| Age | 35 days | 66 days |
| Net assets | $23m | not published |
ACQQ in plain words
Over the period since launch on Aug 14, 2026 to Sep 18, 2026, ACQQ paid 0.0% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 2.1%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −2.1%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) returned −1.3% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 0.8 pts.
CDPI in plain words
Over the period since launch on Jul 14, 2026 to Sep 18, 2026, CDPI paid 0.7% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 0.2%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +0.5%. US dividend stocks (SCHD), used as the dividend proxy returned +4.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 4.1 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 8.2%, paid periodically.
Questions people ask
- Which is cheaper, ACQQ or CDPI?
- ACQQ charges 0.72% a year and CDPI charges 0.45%, so CDPI is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, ACQQ against CDPI, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acqq-vs-cdpi Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.