Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

ACKY vs ACSP: which paid, and which earned it?

ACKY and ACSP both write options for income.

VistaShares Target 15 ACKtivist Distribution ETF and ProShares S&P 500 Autocallable Income ETF.

13.9%ACKY cash paid, 1 year
0.0%ACSP cash paid, 1 year
−1.3%ACKY total return, 1 year
−3.8%ACSP total return, 1 year
ACKY17.9 pts behind SPY · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
SPY+16.6%ACKY−1.3%17.9 pts behind SPYTotal return, distributions reinvestedSPY+16.6%ACKY−1.3%17.9 pts behind SPY
ACSP2.1 pts behind SPY · since launch to Sep 18, 2026
SPY−1.6%ACSP−3.8%2.1 pts behind SPYTotal return, distributions reinvestedSPY−1.6%ACSP−3.8%2.1 pts behind SPY

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, ACKY and ACSP hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Only in each
Only in ACKYOnly in ACSP
Microsoft Corp 11.56%S&P500 FUTURES 35% AUTOCALL SWAP BANK OF AMERICA NA 100.00%
Brookfield Corp 11.16%
Uber Technologies Inc 10.74%
Pershing Square USA Ltd 10.50%
Meta Platforms Inc 10.23%
Amazon.com Inc 9.95%
Howard Hughes Holdings Inc 8.86%
Restaurant Brands International Inc 8.22%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 18, 2026 and Sep 21, 2026.

Performance, window by window

ACKY and ACSP over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
ACKYACSPACKYACSPACKYACSP
3 months+0.8%not published3.7%not published−1.5 ptsnot published
6 months+5.8%not published7.7%not published−12.2 ptsnot published
1 year−1.3%not published13.9%not published−17.9 ptsnot published
Since launch−0.4%−3.8%14.0%0.0%−19.1 pts−2.1 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
ACKY and ACSP on the same fields, as of Sep 18, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
ACKY
VistaShares Target 15 ACKtivist Distribution ETF
Covered call on SPY, paying monthly
ACSP
ProShares S&P 500 Autocallable Income ETF
Option income on SPY
IssuerVistaSharesProShares
Strategycovered calloption income
BenchmarkS&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxyS&P 500 (SPY)
Paysmonthlynot established
Payout rate, annualized15.7%not published
Expense ratio0.95%0.72%
Cash paid, 1 year13.9%0.0% (since launch on Aug 14, 2026)
Price change, 1 year−15.1%−3.8%
Total return, 1 year−1.3%−3.8% (since launch on Aug 14, 2026)
Benchmark return, 1 year+16.6%−1.6%
Ahead or behind−17.9 pts−2.1 pts
Return of capital, latest estimatenot publishednot published
Age374 days35 days
Net assets$45m$27m

ACKY in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, ACKY paid 13.9% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 15.1%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −1.3%. S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy returned +16.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 17.9 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 15.7%, paid monthly.

ACSP in plain words

Over the period since launch on Aug 14, 2026 to Sep 18, 2026, ACSP paid 0.0% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 3.8%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −3.8%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned −1.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 2.1 pts.

Questions people ask

Which is cheaper, ACKY or ACSP?
ACKY charges 0.95% a year and ACSP charges 0.72%, so ACSP is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

ACKY against ACSP, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, ACKY against ACSP, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acky-vs-acsp Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources