ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of . Every figure is the income desk's own, on published data.

BALI vs QDTE

iShares Advantage Large Cap Income ETF and Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF, side by side on the income desk.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, BALI and QDTE hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in BALIOnly in QDTE
Microsoft Corp 7.90%Roundhill Weekly T-Bill ETF 100.00%
NVIDIA Corp 7.73%
Apple Inc 6.59%
Amazon.com Inc 4.52%
Alphabet Inc 3.73%
Meta Platforms Inc 2.05%
Alphabet Inc 2.02%
Johnson & Johnson 1.96%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings as filed for Jun 30, 2026 and Sep 30, 2025.

Performance, window by window

BALI and QDTE over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
BALIQDTEBALIQDTEBALIQDTE
3 months+6.2%+3.6%2.0%8.0%+1.5 pts+1.5 pts
6 months+14.7%+15.3%4.6%15.8%−0.5 pts−4.8 pts
1 year+20.9%+24.7%8.6%37.4%+1.0 pts−0.9 pts
Since launch+77.5%+58.7%29.2%73.5%−8.4 pts−4.9 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
BALI and QDTE on the income desk fields, as of Sep 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
BALI
iShares Advantage Large Cap Income ETF
QDTE
Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF
IssueriSharesRoundhill
Strategycovered call0DTE covered call
BenchmarkS&P 500 (SPY)Nasdaq-100 (QQQ)
Paysmonthlyweekly
Payout rate, annualised7.4%25.1%
Expense rationot published0.96%
Cash paid, 1 year8.6%37.4%
Price change, 1 year+11.4%−17.0%
Total return, 1 year+20.9%+24.7%
Benchmark return, 1 year+20.0%+25.6%
Ahead or behind+1.0 pts−0.9 pts
Return of capital, latest estimatenot publishednot published
Age1072 days911 days

BALI in plain words

Over the year to Sep 4, 2026, BALI paid 8.6% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 11.4%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +20.9%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +20.0% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 1.0 pts. At its price on Sep 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualises to 7.4%, paid monthly.

QDTE in plain words

Over the year to Sep 4, 2026, QDTE paid 37.4% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 17.0%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +24.7%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) returned +25.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 0.9 pts. At its price on Sep 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualises to 25.1%, paid weekly.

Questions people ask

Which paid more, BALI or QDTE?
Over the year to Sep 4, 2026, BALI paid 8.6% of its starting price in cash and QDTE paid 37.4%, so QDTE paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, BALI or QDTE?
With every distribution reinvested, BALI returned +20.9% and QDTE returned +24.7% over the year to Sep 4, 2026, so QDTE returned more.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

BALI against QDTE, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 4, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, BALI against QDTE, data as of Sep 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/BALI-QDTE.html Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources