Data as of . Every figure is the income desk's own, on published data.
DIVO vs QDTE
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, DIVO and QDTE hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in DIVO | Only in QDTE |
|---|---|
| Caterpillar Inc 7.26% | Roundhill Weekly T-Bill ETF 100.00% |
| Apple Inc 5.30% | |
| Microsoft Corp 5.12% | |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co 5.05% | |
| Goldman Sachs Group Inc/The 4.78% | |
| American Express Co 4.70% | |
| TJX Cos Inc/The 4.61% | |
| Amplify Samsung SOFR ETF 4.48% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings as filed for Jun 30, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DIVO | QDTE | DIVO | QDTE | DIVO | QDTE | |
| 3 months | +6.3% | +3.6% | 1.2% | 8.0% | +1.6 pts | +1.5 pts |
| 6 months | +8.1% | +15.3% | 2.4% | 15.8% | −7.1 pts | −4.8 pts |
| 1 year | +17.9% | +24.7% | 6.9% | 37.4% | −2.0 pts | −0.9 pts |
| 3 years | +59.0% | n/a | 19.0% | n/a | −19.0 pts | n/a |
| Since launch | +225.7% | +58.7% | 72.4% | 73.5% | −72.8 pts | −4.9 pts |
| DIVO Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF | QDTE Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | Amplify | Roundhill |
| Strategy | dividend stocks with call overlay | 0DTE covered call |
| Benchmark | S&P 500 (SPY) | Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) |
| Pays | monthly | weekly |
| Payout rate, annualised | 4.8% | 25.1% |
| Expense ratio | 0.56% | 0.96% |
| Cash paid, 1 year | 6.9% | 37.4% |
| Price change, 1 year | +10.4% | −17.0% |
| Total return, 1 year | +17.9% | +24.7% |
| Benchmark return, 1 year | +20.0% | +25.6% |
| Ahead or behind | −2.0 pts | −0.9 pts |
| Return of capital, latest estimate | not published | not published |
| Age | 3551 days | 911 days |
DIVO in plain words
Over the year to Sep 4, 2026, DIVO paid 6.9% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 10.4%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +17.9%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +20.0% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 2.0 pts. At its price on Sep 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualises to 4.8%, paid monthly.
QDTE in plain words
Over the year to Sep 4, 2026, QDTE paid 37.4% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 17.0%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +24.7%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) returned +25.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 0.9 pts. At its price on Sep 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualises to 25.1%, paid weekly.
Questions people ask
- Which paid more, DIVO or QDTE?
- Over the year to Sep 4, 2026, DIVO paid 6.9% of its starting price in cash and QDTE paid 37.4%, so QDTE paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
- Which returned more once distributions are counted, DIVO or QDTE?
- With every distribution reinvested, DIVO returned +17.9% and QDTE returned +24.7% over the year to Sep 4, 2026, so QDTE returned more.
- Which is cheaper, DIVO or QDTE?
- DIVO charges 0.56% a year and QDTE charges 0.96%, so DIVO is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, DIVO against QDTE, data as of Sep 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/DIVO-QDTE.html Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.