Data as of . Every figure is the income desk's own, on published data.
GOOY vs QDTE
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, GOOY and QDTE hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in GOOY | Only in QDTE |
|---|---|
| TREASURY BILL 23.75% | Roundhill Weekly T-Bill ETF 100.00% |
| TREASURY BILL 22.86% | |
| TREASURY BILL 21.83% | |
| TREASURY BILL 20.83% | |
| TREASURY BILL 10.73% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings as filed for Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GOOY | QDTE | GOOY | QDTE | GOOY | QDTE | |
| 3 months | −7.1% | +3.6% | 7.3% | 8.0% | +0.9 pts | +1.5 pts |
| 6 months | +10.6% | +15.3% | 21.3% | 15.8% | −3.0 pts | −4.8 pts |
| 1 year | +35.5% | +24.7% | 45.5% | 37.4% | −10.7 pts | −0.9 pts |
| 3 years | +79.0% | n/a | 81.2% | n/a | −72.7 pts | n/a |
| Since launch | +80.2% | +58.7% | 81.8% | 73.5% | −77.5 pts | −4.9 pts |
| GOOY YieldMax(R) GOOGL Option Income Strategy ETF | QDTE Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | YieldMax | Roundhill |
| Strategy | synthetic covered call | 0DTE covered call |
| Benchmark | Alphabet (GOOGL) | Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) |
| Pays | weekly | weekly |
| Payout rate, annualised | 28.7% | 25.1% |
| Expense ratio | 1.14% | 0.96% |
| Cash paid, 1 year | 45.5% | 37.4% |
| Price change, 1 year | −12.9% | −17.0% |
| Total return, 1 year | +35.5% | +24.7% |
| Benchmark return, 1 year | +46.2% | +25.6% |
| Ahead or behind | −10.7 pts | −0.9 pts |
| Return of capital, latest estimate | 2% | not published |
| Age | 1134 days | 911 days |
GOOY in plain words
Over the year to Sep 4, 2026, GOOY paid 45.5% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 12.9%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +35.5%. Alphabet (GOOGL) returned +46.2% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 10.7 pts. At its price on Sep 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualises to 28.7%, paid weekly. YieldMax estimates that 2% of the distribution paid Sep 4, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterisation rather than a measure of erosion).
QDTE in plain words
Over the year to Sep 4, 2026, QDTE paid 37.4% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 17.0%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +24.7%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) returned +25.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 0.9 pts. At its price on Sep 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualises to 25.1%, paid weekly.
Questions people ask
- Which paid more, GOOY or QDTE?
- Over the year to Sep 4, 2026, GOOY paid 45.5% of its starting price in cash and QDTE paid 37.4%, so GOOY paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
- Which returned more once distributions are counted, GOOY or QDTE?
- With every distribution reinvested, GOOY returned +35.5% and QDTE returned +24.7% over the year to Sep 4, 2026, so GOOY returned more.
- Which is cheaper, GOOY or QDTE?
- GOOY charges 1.14% a year and QDTE charges 0.96%, so QDTE is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, GOOY against QDTE, data as of Sep 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/GOOY-QDTE.html Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.