Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

EZBC vs HODL: which tracked its coin?

Over the year, EZBC finished 0.52 of a percentage point ahead of Bitcoin and HODL 0.62 ahead.

Franklin Templeton Digital Holdings Trust Shares of Franklin Bitcoin ETF and VanEck Bitcoin ETF, side by side, crypto ETFs on ETFIQ.

−32.6%EZBC returned, year
−32.5%HODL returned, year
+0.5 ptsEZBC against Bitcoin, in percentage points
+0.6 ptsHODL against Bitcoin, in percentage points

ETFIQ Coin Capture Score: HODL scores higher

How much of what holding the coin gave did a holder of the fund keep?

EZBC 54.2HODL 60.42.1, the lowest in this set97.9, the highest

A percentile among the 24 spot crypto ETPs with a full year. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All crypto ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed

EZBCWithin a point of Bitcoin · 1 year to Sep 11, 2026
Bitcoin−33.17%EZBC−32.65%about level with BitcoinTotal return, 1 year, fund against the coinBitcoin−33.17%EZBC−32.65%about level with BitcoinTotal return, 1 year
HODLWithin a point of Bitcoin · 1 year to Sep 11, 2026
Bitcoin−33.17%HODL−32.55%0.62 pts ahead of BitcoinTotal return, 1 year, fund against the coinBitcoin−33.17%HODL−32.55%0.62 pts ahead of BitcoinTotal return, 1 year

The same coin, two trusts

EZBC and HODL hold the same asset. Both are 1933 Act trusts holding Bitcoin through a custodian, so neither has a portfolio to compare: the whole of each fund is one line. Over the same days, EZBC finished 0.52 of a percentage point ahead of Bitcoin and HODL 0.62 of a percentage point ahead, so EZBC kept more of what holding the coin gave, by 0.10 of a percentage point. That gap is the fee, the custody, the creation and redemption friction and the market’s pricing of the shares, compounded into one figure.

Performance, window by window

EZBC and HODL over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnThe coin over the same daysDifference, percentage points
EZBCHODLEZBCHODLEZBCHODL
1 month+22.0%+22.0%+21.8%+21.8%+0.2 pts+0.2 pts
3 months+21.5%+21.6%+21.5%+21.5%0.0 pts+0.1 pts
6 months+8.4%+8.6%+8.8%+8.8%−0.4 pts−0.3 pts
1 year−32.6%−32.5%−33.2%−33.2%+0.5 pts+0.6 pts
Since each listed+65.1%+65.2%+66.6%+66.6%−1.5 pts−1.4 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
EZBC and HODL on the same fields, as of Sep 11, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
EZBC
Franklin Templeton Digital Holdings Trust Shares of Franklin Bitcoin ETF
Holds Bitcoin through a custodian, listed Jan 11, 2024
HODL
VanEck Bitcoin ETF
Holds Bitcoin through a custodian, listed Jan 11, 2024
SponsorFranklinVanEck
HoldsBitcoinBitcoin
Net assetsnot read$959m, balance sheet of Jun 30, 2026
Sponsor’s feenot read0.20%
Fee waivernonethe whole fee, until July 31, 2026, first $2.5 billion of assets
Stakingpossible; no clear answer readthe chain has none
ListedJan 11, 2024Jan 11, 2024
Days since listing974 days974 days
Days it has traded669669
Days it closed unchanged11
Quotedon an exchange, every trading dayon an exchange, every trading day
Fund returned, 1 year or since launch−32.6%−32.5%
The coin over the same days−33.2%−33.2%
Difference, percentage points+0.5 pts+0.6 pts
Fund returned since it listed+65.1%+65.2%
Difference since it listed−1.5 pts−1.4 pts
Price$44.66$21.86

EZBC in plain words

EZBC holds Bitcoin through a custodian and trades on an exchange, so a holder gets the coin’s return inside a brokerage account rather than a wallet. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026, Bitcoin moved −33.2% and EZBC returned −32.6%. That leaves it 0.52 of a percentage point ahead. That difference is the fee, the custody cost, the friction of creating and redeeming shares in blocks, and whatever the market paid for the shares rather than for the coin, all of it together. It is the only figure on this page the sponsor does not publish itself. A spot trust is not a registered investment company. It files a 10-K rather than an N-PORT, and its holding is one line: the Bitcoin it custodies.

HODL in plain words

HODL holds Bitcoin through a custodian and trades on an exchange, so a holder gets the coin’s return inside a brokerage account rather than a wallet. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026, Bitcoin moved −33.2% and HODL returned −32.5%. That leaves it 0.62 of a percentage point ahead. HODL charges 0.20% a year and still finished 0.6% ahead of Bitcoin, which a fee cannot do on its own. On a chain with nothing to stake, a fund cannot earn its way past the asset it holds: what moved is what the market paid for the shares.

Questions people ask

Which tracked Bitcoin more closely, EZBC or HODL?
Over the window to Sep 11, 2026, EZBC finished 0.52 of a percentage point ahead of Bitcoin and HODL 0.62 of a percentage point ahead, so EZBC tracked it more closely, by 0.10 of a percentage point. That difference is the fee, the custody cost, the friction of creating and redeeming shares in blocks and whatever the market paid for the shares rather than for the coin, all together.
Do EZBC or HODL pay a staking yield?
What is the difference between EZBC and HODL?
Both hold Bitcoin through a custodian and both trade on an exchange, so what separates them is what each costs a holder over time. EZBC is sponsored by Franklin and listed Jan 11, 2024; HODL by VanEck, listed Jan 11, 2024.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

EZBC against HODL, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 11, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, EZBC against HODL, data as of Sep 11, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/crypto/EZBC-HODL Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources