Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

CHNL vs CLNK: which tracked its coin?

Against Chainlink, CHNL finished +3.2% and CLNK +0.5%, once both returns are compounded.

Chainlink ETF and Bitwise Chainlink ETF, side by side, crypto ETFs on ETFIQ.

+31.2%CHNL returned, time since it listed
−17.6%CLNK returned, time since it listed
+2.1 ptsCHNL against Chainlink, in percentage points
+0.6 ptsCLNK against Chainlink, in percentage points

ETFIQ Coin Capture Score: CHNL scores higher

How much of what holding the coin gave did a holder of the fund keep?

CHNL 64.3CLNK 41.11.8, the lowest in this set98.2, the highest

A percentile among the 28 spot crypto ETPs listed less than a year. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All crypto ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed

CHNL2.1 pts from Chainlink · since launch to Sep 11, 2026
Chainlink+29.11%CHNL+31.23%2.12 pts ahead of ChainlinkTotal return, since launch, fund against the coinChainlink+29.11%CHNL+31.23%2.12 pts aheadTotal return, since launch
CLNKWithin a point of Chainlink · since launch to Sep 11, 2026
Chainlink−18.17%CLNK−17.62%0.55 pts aheadTotal return, since launch, fund against the coinChainlink−18.17%CLNK−17.62%0.55 pts ahead of ChainlinkTotal return, since launch

The same coin, two trusts

CHNL and CLNK hold the same asset. Both are 1933 Act trusts holding Chainlink through a custodian, so neither has a portfolio to compare: the whole of each fund is one line. Over the days each has traded, CHNL finished 2.1 percentage points ahead of Chainlink and CLNK 0.55 of a percentage point ahead, but the two windows are not the same days, so neither figure is set against the other here. That gap is the fee, the custody, the creation and redemption friction and the market’s pricing of the shares, compounded into one figure. CLNK has 77 more days of record than CHNL, and a longer record is a longer window over which a cost can show itself.

Performance, window by window

CHNL and CLNK over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnThe coin over the same daysDifference, percentage points
CHNLCLNKCHNLCLNKCHNLCLNK
1 month+34.9%+32.8%+33.2%+33.2%+1.7 pts−0.4 pts
3 months+51.5%+47.6%+46.8%+46.8%+3.2% of its growth+0.8 pts
6 monthsnot published+26.7%not published+27.0%not published−0.3 pts
Since each listed+31.2%−17.6%+29.1%−18.2%+2.1 pts+0.6 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
CHNL and CLNK on the same fields, as of Sep 11, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
CHNL
Chainlink ETF
Holds Chainlink through a custodian, listed Apr 1, 2026
CLNK
Bitwise Chainlink ETF
Holds Chainlink through a custodian, listed Jan 14, 2026
SponsorChainlinkBitwise
HoldsChainlinkChainlink
Net assetsnot read$20m, balance sheet of Jun 30, 2026
Sponsor’s feenot read0.34%
Fee waivernonethe whole fee, until April 13, 2026
Stakingpossible; no clear answer readthe filings say it does
ListedApr 1, 2026Jan 14, 2026
Days since listing163 days240 days
Days it has traded113166
Days it closed unchanged10
Quotedon an exchange, every trading dayon an exchange, every trading day
Fund returned, 1 year or since launch+31.2%−17.6%
The coin over the same days+29.1%−18.2%
Difference, percentage points+2.1 pts+0.6 pts
Fund returned since it listed+31.2%−17.6%
Difference since it listed+2.1 pts+0.6 pts
Price$26.9811$21.1206

CHNL in plain words

CHNL holds Chainlink through a custodian and trades on an exchange, so a holder gets the coin’s return inside a brokerage account rather than a wallet. Over the time since it listed to Sep 11, 2026, Chainlink moved +29.1% and CHNL returned +31.2%. That leaves it 2.1 percentage points ahead. That difference is the fee, the custody cost, the friction of creating and redeeming shares in blocks, and whatever the market paid for the shares rather than for the coin, all of it together. It is the only figure on this page the sponsor does not publish itself. A spot trust is not a registered investment company. It files a 10-K rather than an N-PORT, and its holding is one line: the Chainlink it custodies.

CLNK in plain words

CLNK holds Chainlink through a custodian and trades on an exchange, so a holder gets the coin’s return inside a brokerage account rather than a wallet. Over the time since it listed to Sep 11, 2026, Chainlink moved −18.2% and CLNK returned −17.6%. That leaves it 0.55 of a percentage point ahead. CLNK charges 0.34% a year and still finished 0.6% ahead of Chainlink, which a fee cannot do on its own. Chainlink is a proof of stake chain, so a fund holding it can stake. CLNK’s own filings say it does (10-Q, Aug 12, 2026). It charges 0.34% and finished only −0.6% behind Chainlink, so staking covered about 0.9% of that fee over these days.

Questions people ask

Which tracked Chainlink more closely, CHNL or CLNK?
Over the days each has traded, CHNL finished 2.1 percentage points ahead of Chainlink and CLNK 0.55 of a percentage point ahead. Those are not set against each other here, because the two windows are not the same days, so neither is nearer its coin than the other on this page. Each difference carries the fee, the custody cost, the friction of creating and redeeming shares in blocks and whatever the market paid for the shares rather than for the coin.
Do CHNL or CLNK pay a staking yield?
What is the difference between CHNL and CLNK?
Both hold Chainlink through a custodian and both trade on an exchange, so what separates them is what each costs a holder over time. CHNL is sponsored by Chainlink and listed Apr 1, 2026; CLNK by Bitwise, listed Jan 14, 2026.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

CHNL against CLNK, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 11, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, CHNL against CLNK, data as of Sep 11, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/crypto/CHNL-CLNK Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources