Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

BTCO vs MSBT: which tracked its coin?

Over the window both share, BTCO finished level with Bitcoin and MSBT 0.04 ahead.

Invesco Galaxy Bitcoin ETF and Morgan Stanley Bitcoin Trust, side by side, crypto ETFs on ETFIQ.

−32.7%BTCO returned, year
+8.3%MSBT returned, time since it listed
+0.5 ptsBTCO against Bitcoin, in percentage points
−0.3 ptsMSBT against Bitcoin, in percentage points

ETFIQ Coin Capture Score: MSBT scores higher

How much of what holding the coin gave did a holder of the fund keep?

BTCO 27.1MSBT 30.42.1, the lowest in this set97.9, the highest

A percentile among the 24 spot crypto ETPs with a full year. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All crypto ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed

BTCOWithin a point of Bitcoin · 1 year to Sep 11, 2026
Bitcoin−33.17%BTCO−32.72%about level with BitcoinTotal return, 1 year, fund against the coinBitcoin−33.17%BTCO−32.72%about level with BitcoinTotal return, 1 year
MSBTWithin a point of Bitcoin · since launch to Sep 11, 2026
Bitcoin+8.61%MSBT+8.26%about level with BitcoinTotal return, since launch, fund against the coinBitcoin+8.61%MSBT+8.26%about levelTotal return, since launch

The same coin, two trusts

BTCO and MSBT hold the same asset. Both are 1933 Act trusts holding Bitcoin through a custodian, so neither has a portfolio to compare: the whole of each fund is one line. Over the days each has traded, BTCO finished 0.45 of a percentage point ahead of Bitcoin and MSBT 0.35 of a percentage point behind, but the two windows are not the same days, so neither figure is set against the other here. That gap is the fee, the custody, the creation and redemption friction and the market’s pricing of the shares, compounded into one figure. BTCO has 818 more days of record than MSBT, and a longer record is a longer window over which a cost can show itself.

Performance, window by window

BTCO and MSBT over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnThe coin over the same daysDifference, percentage points
BTCOMSBTBTCOMSBTBTCOMSBT
1 month+21.9%+22.0%+21.8%+21.8%+0.2 pts+0.2 pts
3 months+21.5%+21.6%+21.5%+21.5%0.0 pts0.0 pts
6 months+8.4%not published+8.8%not published−0.4 ptsnot published
1 year−32.7%not published−33.2%not published+0.5 ptsnot published
Since each listed+65.2%+8.3%+66.6%+8.6%−1.4 pts−0.3 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
BTCO and MSBT on the same fields, as of Sep 11, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
BTCO
Invesco Galaxy Bitcoin ETF
Holds Bitcoin through a custodian, listed Jan 11, 2024
MSBT
Morgan Stanley Bitcoin Trust
Holds Bitcoin through a custodian, listed Apr 8, 2026
SponsorInvescoMorgan Stanley
HoldsBitcoinBitcoin
Net assetsnot readnot read
Sponsor’s fee0.25%0.14%
Fee waiverthe whole feenone
Stakingthe chain has nonethe chain has none
ListedJan 11, 2024Apr 8, 2026
Days since listing974 days156 days
Days it has traded669109
Days it closed unchanged10
Quotedon an exchange, every trading dayon an exchange, every trading day
Fund returned, 1 year or since launch−32.7%+8.3%
The coin over the same days−33.2%+8.6%
Difference, percentage points+0.5 pts−0.3 pts
Fund returned since it listed+65.2%+8.3%
Difference since it listed−1.4 pts−0.3 pts
Price$76.86$22.16

BTCO in plain words

BTCO holds Bitcoin through a custodian and trades on an exchange, so a holder gets the coin’s return inside a brokerage account rather than a wallet. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026, Bitcoin moved −33.2% and BTCO returned −32.7%. That leaves it 0.45 of a percentage point ahead. That difference is the fee, the custody cost, the friction of creating and redeeming shares in blocks, and whatever the market paid for the shares rather than for the coin, all of it together. It is the only figure on this page the sponsor does not publish itself. BTCO charges 0.25% a year and still finished 0.5% ahead of Bitcoin, which a fee cannot do on its own. On a chain with nothing to stake, a fund cannot earn its way past the asset it holds: what moved is what the market paid for the shares. A spot trust is not a registered investment company. It files a 10-K rather than an N-PORT, and its holding is one line: the Bitcoin it custodies.

MSBT in plain words

MSBT holds Bitcoin through a custodian and trades on an exchange, so a holder gets the coin’s return inside a brokerage account rather than a wallet. Over the time since it listed to Sep 11, 2026, Bitcoin moved +8.6% and MSBT returned +8.3%. That leaves it 0.35 of a percentage point behind. MSBT charges 0.14% a year and finished 0.3% behind Bitcoin, so the fee is less than the whole difference and the rest is what the market paid for the shares, which moved against holders.

Questions people ask

Which tracked Bitcoin more closely, BTCO or MSBT?
Over the days each has traded, BTCO finished 0.45 of a percentage point ahead of Bitcoin and MSBT 0.35 of a percentage point behind. Those are not set against each other here, because the two windows are not the same days, so neither is nearer its coin than the other on this page. Each difference carries the fee, the custody cost, the friction of creating and redeeming shares in blocks and whatever the market paid for the shares rather than for the coin.
Do BTCO or MSBT pay a staking yield?
Bitcoin is a proof of work chain, so there is nothing to stake and no fund holding it can pay a staking yield.
What is the difference between BTCO and MSBT?
Both hold Bitcoin through a custodian and both trade on an exchange, so what separates them is what each costs a holder over time. BTCO is sponsored by Invesco and listed Jan 11, 2024; MSBT by Morgan Stanley, listed Apr 8, 2026.
Which is cheaper, BTCO or MSBT?
BTCO charges 0.25% a year and MSBT charges 0.14%, so MSBT is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

BTCO against MSBT, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 11, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, BTCO against MSBT, data as of Sep 11, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/crypto/BTCO-MSBT Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources